Logo Watermark

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agenda

Ordinary Council Meeting

21 February 2022

The meeting commences at 6.30pm. If members of the public are

not interested in any business recommended to be considered in

Closed Session or there is no such business, Council will ordinarily

  commence consideration of all other business at 7pm.

 

LC_WebBanner


 

Notice of Meeting

 

Dear Councillors

 

Notice is given of the Ordinary Council Meeting, to be held in the Council Chambers on Monday 21 February 2022 commencing at 7pm. The business to be transacted at the meeting is included in this business paper.

 

Yours faithfully

Craig - GM

Craig Wrightson

General Manager

 

Council Meeting Procedures

 

The Council meeting is chaired by the Mayor, Councillor Andrew Zbik. Councillors are entitled to one vote on a matter. If votes are equal, the Chairperson has a second or casting vote. When a majority of Councillors vote in favour of a Motion it becomes a decision of the Council. Minutes of Council and Committee meetings are published on Council’s website www.lanecove.nsw.gov.au by 5pm on the Thursday following the meeting.

 

The Meeting is conducted in accordance with Council's Code of Meeting Practice. The order of business is listed in the Agenda on the next page. That order will be followed unless Council resolves to modify the order at the meeting. This may occur for example where the members of the public in attendance are interested in specific items on the agenda.

 

The Public Forum will hear registered speakers from the Public Gallery as well as online using the web platform Zoom. All speakers wishing to participate in the public forum must register by using the online form no later than midnight, on the day prior to the meeting (Sunday, 20 February 2022) and a Zoom meeting link will be emailed to the provided email address of those registered as an online speaker. Please note that the time limit of three minutes per address still applies, so please make sure your submission meets this criteria. Alternatively, members of the public can still submit their written address via email to service@lanecove.nsw.gov.au. Written addresses are to be received by Council no later than midnight, on the day prior to the meeting. (500 words maximum).

 

Please note meetings held in the Council Chambers are recorded on tape for the purposes of verifying the accuracy of minutes and the tapes are not disclosed to any third party under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, except as allowed under section 18(1) or section 19(1) of the PPIP Act, or where Council is compelled to do so by court order, warrant or subpoena or by any other legislation. Should you require assistance to participate in the meeting due to a disability; or wish to obtain further information in relation to Council, please contact Council’s Executive Manager – Corporate Services on (02) 9911 3550.

 

 

 


Ordinary Council 21 February 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

 

APOLOGIES

 

OPENING OF MEETING WITH PRAYER

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO COUNTRY

 

NOTICE OF WEBCASTING OF MEETING

 

public forum

 

Members of the public may address the Council Meeting on any issue for 3 minutes.

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

 

1.        ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 10 JANUARY 2022

2.        EXTRAORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 24 JANUARY 2022

 

Orders Of The Day

 

Notices of Motion

 

3.       Mayoral Minute - Lane Cove North Neighbourhood Centre................ 5

 

4.       Notice of Motion - Creating a Renewable Energy Future in Lane Cove 7

 

5.       Notice of Motion - Creation of a St Leonards South Coordination Unit (SLCSU).......................................................................................................................... 10

 

6.       Notice of Motion - Minute of Silence for Prayer or Reflection..... 12

 

7.       Notice of Motion - Traffic at the intersection of Parklands, Epping and Longueville Roads........................................................................................ 14

 

8.       Notice of Motion - Deferral of Commencement of Process to Close Canberra Avenue.................................................................................................... 15

 

9.       Notice of Motion - Establishment of Sports Advisory Committee. 18

 

10.     Notice of Motion - Improving Community Collaboration and Communication......................................................................................................... 19

 

11.     Notice of Motion - Bob Campbell Working Group - Additional Members......................................................................................................................................... 22

 

12.     Notice of Motion - St Leonards South Central Precinct Land Acquisition for Open Space Park.................................................................... 23

 

Officer Reports for Determination

 

13.     Representation on Council Advisory Committees and Other External Organisations for 2022........................................................................................ 26

 

14.     Infrastructure Contributions Reforms - Submissions....................... 32

 

15.     Traffic Committee - January 2022.................................................................... 45

 

16.     Bob Campbell Oval - Proposed Delivery Program............................... 110

 

17.     Proposed Rezoning Reforms.......................................................................... 114

 

18.     Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct - NSW Government Funding Opportunity............................................................................................................ 175

 

19.     North Sydney Council request to advocate for changes to the St Leonards Crows Nest 2036 Plan.................................................................... 230

 

20.     Councillor Training Attendance Request - Local Government NSW Executive Certificate for Elected Members.......................................... 233

 

21.     Second Quarter Review of the 2021/22 Delivery Program and Operational Plan................................................................................................. 235

 

22.     Advocacy letter to DPIE re BASIX higher standards......................... 237

 

23.     Council support for NSW Plastics Action Plan.................................... 244

 

24.     Second Quarterly Budget Review - 2021/22 Budget.............................. 246

 

25.     Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022.......................................................... 260

 

26.     Village Public Art program - Birdwood Avenue - Commonwealth Bank building..................................................................................................................... 317

 

Officer Reports for Information

 

27.     Ministerial Order - Planning Expectations............................................. 322

 

28.     Electoral Funding Disclosure Requirements....................................... 332

 

29.     Council Snapshot January 2022..................................................................... 334

 

 

 

 


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Mayoral Minute - Lane Cove North Neighbourhood Centre

 

 

Subject:          Mayoral Minute - Lane Cove North Neighbourhood Centre    

Record No:    SU129 - 8062/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Andrew Zbik 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The aim of this motion is to address the lack of local shopping and place amenity in Lane Cove North as the residents of Lane Cove North do not have a local convenience store or small-scale neighbourhood shops that is an inviting place to meet and gather, shop or dine.

Discussion

 

There are nine (9) parcels of land in the Lane Cove North/Mowbray Precinct that currently do not have a pending Development Application for approval. Seven (7) of these properties located at 618-624 Mowbray Road, Lane Cove North and 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North are owned by the Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC). The NSW Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC) is a self-funded Public Trading Enterprise (PTE), governed by the Housing Act 2001, and is part of the NSW Government’s Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE).

 

Via the NSW Parliament Legislative Council, the following question was asked to the NSW Minister for Mental Health, Regional Youth and Women representing the Minister for Water, Property and Housing:-

 

7815 - Water, Property and Housing - LAND AND HOUSING CORPORATION (LAHC)

Jackson, Rose to the Minister for Mental Health, Regional Youth and Women representing the Minister for Water, Property and Housing

(1)  What plan does the Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC) have for the properties located at 618-624 Mowbray Road, Lane Cove North and 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North?

(2)  Has the LAHC commenced any pre-planning to lodge a Development Application for the above-mentioned sites?

(3)  Can the Minister confirm that these sites will be used for social housing?

(a) If so, what is the proposed current breakdown?

(b) Are there active proposals being considered for a convenience store or shop on these sites?

Answer

I am advised:

The NSW Land and Housing Corporation is currently determining the future use of the sites at 618-624 Mowbray Road West and 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North. No pre-planning work has commenced for the lodgement of a Development Application.

Question asked on 22 November 2021 (session 57-1) and published in Questions & Answers Paper No. 631

Answer received on 13 December 2021 and published in Questions & Answers Paper No. 646

Upon further discussions with Council staff, the following has been confirmed:-

 

1.   The current R4 High Density Residential Zoning for the Lane Cove North/Mowbray Precinct permits a ‘Neighbourhood Shop’ of up to 300 square metres (where fronting a local road, or 400 square metres when fronting any other road) to be included in a new building.

2.   If a commercial premise larger than 300/400 square metres is desired, Council would be required to consider a planning proposal to change the zoning. This would require extensive community consultation before such a re-zoning could take place.

Summary

 

In summary, this motion seeks to commence discussions with the Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC) requesting consideration of a commercial premise that could facilitate a local convenience store within any future building at 618-624 Mowbray Road, Lane Cove North and 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:-

1.   Write to landowners within the Lane Cove North/Mowbray Precinct area who own land zoned R4 who have not yet lodged a Development Application to ask their level of interest in developing a ‘Neighbourhood Shop’ to support a local convenience store and/or local shops; and

2.   A report be provided back to Council on what is required to further the proposal should the owners display interest in progressing the matter.

 

Councillor Andrew Zbik

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Creating a Renewable Energy Future in Lane Cove

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Creating a Renewable Energy Future in Lane Cove    

Record No:    SU8201 - 8053/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Kathy Bryla; Councillor Rochelle Flood; Councillor Bridget Kennedy; Councillor David Roenfeldt; Councillor Merri Southwood; Councillor Andrew Zbik 

 

 

Executive Summary

The objective of this motion is for Council to commit to facilitating options with our community to advance the adoption of initiatives to transition to renewable electricity generation to further expediate the reduction of emissions within our LGA.

Discussion

 

In 2019 Council declared a climate emergency.

 

More recently Council implemented a Climate Resilience Plan which has the goal to reach an 80% Co2 emissions reduction target by 2036.

 

Late in 2021, Council resolved to source 100% of its electricity needs from renewable generation from July 2022 onwards. However, Council’s emissions account for just 2% of the LGA’s total emissions prior to sourcing 100% of its electricity supply from renewable generation.

 

Residential dwellings account for 55% of community emissions. The source of emissions for residential dwellings are:-

·    59% from electricity consumption.

·    27% transport.

·    9% gas usage.

·    5% waste.

 

The balance of our community emissions comes from commercial and industrial purposes.

 

Transitioning existing electricity usage to be sourced from renewable generation and focusing on increasing renewable installations within new developments is the next step in reducing emissions in the LGA.

 

Councils are agile and capable of making things happen faster than State and Federal Governments. Councils are more grassroots than any other tier of government.

 

Examples to phase out gas usage include:-

·    North Sydney Council refurbishing its aquatic centre with heat pumps.

·    Inner West Council looking at replacing gas boilers with heat pumps.

·    Waverley, Canada Bay Councils committed to removing gas from Council buildings.

·    Canterbury – Bankstown Council planning to not permit new gas connections in key growth areas.

 

Regarding electricity sourced from renewable generation, approximately 56% of residents in Lane Cove now live in a strata scheme.

Council provides a FREE solar mapping tool to identify the potential for solar panels on roof tops in Lane Cove. Many large rooftops that have solar generating capacity are on existing apartment blocks. 

Strata Schemes find it difficult to install solar panels for the following reasons:-

1.   Strata cash reserves are generally not sufficient to purchase solar panels, install solar arrays and utilise batteries; and

2.   A strata scheme cannot install solar panels and sell or distribute power to owners (Under NSW Law, the strata scheme would need to be registered as an Energy Retailer to do this).

Therefore, many residents are unable to take action to adopt renewable energy generation at a local level.

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council: -

1.   Include in the draft Community Strategic Plan a strategy to facilitate the increase in the usage of energy sourced from renewable generation in the Lane Cove LGA. 

2.   Consider the following initiatives as key actions in the 2022/23 Delivery and Operational plan:- 

a.   Council research bulk buying options for solar panels for the community.

b.   Focusing on smart development by liaising with Canterbury-Bankstown Council on their actions taken and passing a moratorium on gas connections in all new developments unless commercial food establishments. This would meet the objective of the Climate Resilience plan to set locally specific performance standards for new residential and non-residential developments.

c.   Commit to removing gas from council buildings and replacing gas boilers which reach the end of their life, with heat pumps.

d.   Explore joining the ‘Solar my School’ program

e.   Launch an expressions of interest process to create a virtual solar grid on large strata and commercial roof spaces within the Lane Cove LGA. 

f.    Explore the possibility of a Virtual Energy Network (VEN) linking solar sites together to utilise power generated before feeding back into the grid.

i. Request Council compile a report looking at options for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading (for example, the AGL Virtual Trial(AGL VPP) occurring in places including Byron Bay and Energy Locals Retail provider (via Enosi Powertracker) to  help determine viability for the Lane Cove community

ii.  Request Council to look at grant funding opportunities for innovative community solar projects, and large-scale battery storage projects available from ARENA or the Clean Energy Innovation Fund.  

g.   Promote the NSW Solar for Low Income Program

h.   Develop an educational program to facilitate other ways that people can invest in renewables if they are unable to put on their roofs directly, e.g. Clearsky Solar or Pingalla (which are community funded solar programs for business) (Lake Macquarie council as example) Also Enova Community Energy - social enterprise, existing peer-to-peer initiatives that are available now for uptake. Include in this program information on heat pumps as a non-gas option for heating and cooling.

i.    Reach out to NSROC Councils to collaborate on joint educational opportunities across all LGAs

j.    Include any other ideas that are suggested by Councillors.

3.   Write to all strata schemes in the Lane Cove LGA seeking their interest in cooperating with initiatives to facilitate solar and other renewable energy solutions for strata buildings. 

 

Councillor Kathy Bryla

Councillor

 

Councillor Rochelle Flood

Councillor

 

Councillor Bridget Kennedy

Councillor

 

Councillor David Roenfeldt

Councillor

 

Councillor Merri Southwood

Councillor

 

Councillor Andrew Zbik

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Creation of a St Leonards South Coordination Unit (SLCSU)

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Creation of a St Leonards South Coordination Unit (SLCSU)    

Record No:    SU8691 - 8026/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Merri Southwood; Councillor David Roenfeldt 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report seeks Council support for the establishment of a St Leonards South Coordination Unit. The role of this unit is to manage and coordinate delivery of the individual development projects within the St Leonards South Master Plan area and of projects adjacent to the St Leonards South Master Plan area, with the objective to minimise disruption to amenity of the communities within these areas, to ensure smooth delivery of development projects, and compliance with conditions of consent.

 

Background

 

There are 23 amalgamated sites within 8 hectares at the St Leonards South precinct, with at least 1974 dwellings to be constructed in developments ranging from 6 storeys (25m) to 19 storeys (65m).

 

The St Leonards South site is constrained by topography, a lack of East-West road links that connect to major roads and a limited number of road access points from the site to the already congested Pacific Highway and River Road.

 

Residents in and adjacent to St Leonards South (including many not in the Lane Cove LGA) are already significantly impacted by the construction activity for the St Leonards over-rail plaza and the demolition and excavation for construction of a display unit at 21 Canberra Avenue, St Leonards South.

 

These impacts include failure to comply with approved construction hours, dust, interruption to traffic flow caused by parking of large vehicles in narrow streets, risk to pedestrian safety from large vehicle movements and noise. These impacts will worsen with development of the twenty-three (23) amalgamated sites.

 

Three development applications have been lodged already for St Leonards South and one of the applications is scheduled for determination by the Sydney North Planning Panel on 2 March 2022.

 

Large scale construction activity may commence soon.

 

The complexity and scale of the St Leonards South project requires management and coordination of the delivery of the individual development projects, within and adjacent to it, to minimise disruption to community amenities, to ensure smooth delivery of development projects and to ensure compliance with conditions of consent.

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council: -

1.   receive a report at its 21 March 2022 meeting on the establishment of a St Leonards South Coordination Unit (SLSCU) to manage and coordinate delivery of the individual development projects within the St Leonards South Master Plan area and of projects adjacent to the St Leonards South Master Plan area, to minimise disruption to amenity of the communities within these areas, to ensure smooth delivery of development projects and compliance with conditions of consent.

Such report to detail: -

a.   a comprehensive risk management plan and a monitoring framework across the site to identify potential problem areas and solutions;

b.   strategies for the coordination of construction and non-construction traffic movements within the St Leonards South Master Plan area and provision of advice to Council as to the conditions of Construction Traffic Management Plans to ensure that public safety considerations and the need to preserve resident amenity are adequately acknowledged in the development of the sites in the St Leonards South Master Plan;

c.   proposed representation on the SLSCU, such representation to include residents within and adjacent to the St Leonards South precinct, representatives of St Leonards South developers and those of adjacent sites and representatives of the North Sydney and Willoughby LGAs.

d.   resources required to ensure that the SLSCU delivers on its objectives; and

e.   draft terms of reference for the SLCSU.

2.   Noting that three development applications have already been exhibited for the St Leonards South precinct, Council acknowledges that the establishment of the SLSCU is a priority for Council.

 

Councillor Merri Southwood

Councillor

 

Councillor David Roenfeldt

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Minute of Silence for Prayer or Reflection

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Minute of Silence for Prayer or Reflection    

Record No:    SU837 - 8222/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Rochelle Flood; Councillor Bridget Kennedy 

 

 

Executive Summary

                                                              

The current Council Code of Meeting Practice specifies that the Order of Business for an Ordinary Meeting of the council should include a Meeting Prayer. This motion seeks to amend section 8.1 of the Code of Meeting Practice to instead allow for a minute of silence that allows for either prayer, or reflection on our duties and responsibilities as councillors, and local residents.

 

Discussion

 

The Meeting Prayer at the start of Ordinary Council Meetings has typically been a way to reflect on the duties we have as councillors, and to ensure those responsibilities are front of mind before we begin the business of the day. The prayer currently used is most closely aligned with Christianity, and is therefore not representative of the full spectrums of faith that may be held by Councillors or Lane Cove residents more broadly. The 2016 Census revealed that Lane Cove residents came from a variety of cultural and religious backgrounds, with over 30% of residents indicating they did not have a religion. 

 

An individual approach to opening the meeting would be much more inclusive of the diverse community we have in Lane Cove. Replacing the spoken Meeting Prayer with a minute of silence for prayer or reflection would allow councillors and residents to choose which option works best for them, and to use that moment in a meaningful way. It recognises the personal nature of both faith and reflection, as well as the importance of being inclusive. 

 

It is worth noting that the Model Code of Meeting Practice does not include a prayer as one of its standard provisions. Other Sydney Councils including, for example Willoughby, North Sydney, City of Sydney, and Inner West have opted not to include the prayer. Some have removed it entirely and others such as Inner West have opted for a moment of silence or quiet contemplation. In 2018, a number of councils in Victoria removed the Meeting Prayer from their Order of Business, a move that the Australian Local Government Association welcomed as an important step in recognising diversity. This proposal aims to establish a balance that meets the needs for those from different religious backgrounds, and the needs of those who are not religious, by allowing for an individual choice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:-

 

1.   Council undertake Community Consultation to amend Cl 8.1 of the Code of Meeting Practice so that point three of the Order of Business for Ordinary Council Meetings now reads:

 

Minute of silence for reflection or prayer 

 

2.   This minute of silence for prayer or reflection occurs after the Acknowledgement of Country.

 

 

Councillor Rochelle Flood

Councillor

 

Councillor Bridget Kennedy

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Traffic at the intersection of Parklands, Epping and Longueville Roads

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Traffic at the intersection of Parklands, Epping and Longueville Roads    

Record No:    SU6845 - 8286/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Scott Bennison; Councillor David Brooks-Horn; Councillor Katherine Mort 

 

 

Background

 

There have been a number of complaints regarding speeding through the traffic lights at the intersection of Epping and Longueville and then performing a U-turn in the middle of the street or at the intersection of Parkland Avenue and Landers Road. This intersection is not a round-a-bout and also has a Childcare Centre located on the corner, creating significant safety issues.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the General Manager investigate and report back to Council with options of how best to stop motor vehicles performing U-turns in the middle of Parklands Road at the intersection of Parklands Road and Landers Road.

 

Councillor Scott Bennison

Councillor

 

Councillor David Brooks-Horn

Councillor

 

Councillor Katherine Mort

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Deferral of Commencement of Process to Close Canberra Avenue

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Deferral of Commencement of Process to Close Canberra Avenue    

Record No:    SU1462 - 8039/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Merri Southwood; Councillor David Roenfeldt 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report requests that Council defer the commencement of the process to close Canberra Avenue, between River Road and its intersection with Duntroon Avenue, to integrate the land into Newlands Park, as this road closure will cause significant disruption to the nearby residents.

 

Background

 

At the Council meeting of 11 May 2020, the following resolution was passed:-

G.  Subject to Ministerial approval of Planning Proposal 25:-

a. commence the process to close Canberra Avenue, between River Road at (sic) its intersection with Duntroon Avenue to integrate the land into Newlands Park once the section 7.11 Plan funding has been confirmed.

b. extend the community consultation to the area bound by Pacific Highway, North Shore Railway Line, River Road and Greenwich Road or broader if determined to do so.

 

Ministerial approval of Planning Proposal 25 has been granted and confirmation of the Section 7.11 Plan is imminent.

The proposed closure of Canberra Avenue was not the subject of community consultation in respect of St Leonards South nor was it the subject of any RMS assessment of the St Leonards South Planning Proposal.

In the event that Canberra Avenue is closed from River Road, the impacts on traffic flow to and from the southern boundary of the St Leonards South Master Plan site will be:-

·    The only opportunity for a right and left hand turn from the southern portion of the St Leonards South precinct will be from Duntroon Avenue;

·    Duntroon Avenue is a narrow road unsuited to the passage of large construction vehicles and high volumes of commuter traffic; and

·    As has been outlined by North Sydney Council in its submission on DA 99/2021, the Duntroon Avenue/River Road intersection raises potential safety issues caused by sight lines arising from the humpback nature of the North Shore Railway overbridge of River Road and the winding nature of River Road itself.

There is already significant disruption to the residents adjacent to St Leonards South caused by construction vehicles associated with the preliminary stages of construction of the St Leonards over-rail plaza and the excavation of the site for a single display unit in Canberra Avenue.

There are twenty-three (23) amalgamated sites in the St Leonards South Master Plan.

Three (3) development applications have already been lodged for sites in Canberra Avenue and Holdsworth Ave.

They are:-

DA 99/2021 at 21 Canberra Avenue (319 dwellings)

DA 162/2021 at 13-19 Canberra Avenue (84 dwellings)

DA 187/2021 at 10-12 Marshall Avenue/1-3 Holdsworth Avenue (104 dwellings)

 

The Council resolution to close a portion of Canberra Avenue, a road that provides access and egress point to and from River Road, additional to Duntroon Avenue, must be deferred to minimise construction vehicle congestion on Duntroon Avenue and potential safety issues at the Duntroon Avenue/River Road intersection during the construction of the above developments.

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:-

1.   No action will be taken by Council at this time to commence the process to close Canberra Avenue, between River Road and its intersection with Duntroon Avenue.

2.   Council develop for presentation to the meeting of 19 April 2022 a strategy to minimise cumulative impacts of construction traffic arising from DA 99/2021, DA 162/2021 and DA 187/2021.

3.   Council to receive at the meeting of 19 April 2022 a report detailing the cumulative traffic movements and impacts of:-

·    all vehicles (construction and otherwise) during the development of the 23 amalgamated sites in the St Leonards South Master Plan until Certificates of Occupancy have issued for all developments, and

·    all vehicles after Certificates of Occupancy have issued for all developments.

4.   The report outlined in 3 to include a comparison of impacts on the road network within the St Leonards South Master Plan area (including access roads to River Road and Pacific Highway) for:-

·    closure of Canberra Avenue as detailed in the report to Council of 11 May 2020, and

·    no closure of Canberra Avenue.

5.   Council will review its proposed road closure after consideration of this report.

6.   No action will be taken in respect of any future closure of Canberra Avenue without a further resolution of Council to commence the road closure process.

7.   Council will consult in respect of this road closure with the community within the area bounded by Pacific Highway, North Shore Railway Line, River Road and Greenwich Road or broader if determined to do so.

 

Councillor Merri Southwood

Councillor

 

Councillor David Roenfeldt

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Establishment of Sports Advisory Committee

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Establishment of Sports Advisory Committee    

Record No:    SU7169 - 8265/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Scott Bennison; Councillor David Brooks-Horn; Councillor Katherine Mort 

 

 

Executive Summary

                                                              

The Lane Cove LGA has a large diversity of sporting clubs and demand for sporting facilities and grounds is increasing significantly, through increased participation rates and population increases, resulting in increased membership. Council should establish an Advisory Committee to understand what their needs are and to better plan delivery of sporting facilities.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:-

 

1.         Council establish a Sporting Club Advisory Committee;

 

2.         The General Manager prepare a draft constitution for discussion at Council workshop to discuss objectives, sporting club appointments, Councillor representation and other matters relating to the operation of an Advisory Committee.

 

 

Councillor Scott Bennison

Councillor

 

Councillor David Brooks-Horn

Councillor

 

Councillor Katherine Mort

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Improving Community Collaboration and Communication

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Improving Community Collaboration and Communication    

Record No:    SU80 - 8068/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Kathy Bryla; Councillor Rochelle Flood; Councillor Bridget Kennedy; Councillor David Roenfeldt; Councillor Merri Southwood; Councillor Andrew Zbik 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The objectives of this motion are to conduct a collaborative workshop with residents and community stakeholders on how Council can develop new techniques to collaborate with our community and to improve Council’s website and how it integrates with Council’s other communication channels to make it easier for residents to engage and seek information from our Council.

 

Discussion

 

Community Participation Plan and Community Engagement Policy.


Lane Cove Council’s Community Engagement Policy in its current version was approved and commenced in July 2017. 

 

Council’s current Community Engagement Policy prescribes the following:-

 

1.   Guiding Principles as to why and how community engagement is to take place.

2.   When community engagement is to take place.

3.   Identification of Stakeholders and target audiences for Councils community engagement activities.

4.   Levels of engagement based upon the subject matter.

5.   Methods of engagement.

We believe there is a shift in expectations from our community that Council ‘collaborates’ earlier with residents and stakeholders in our community in the decision making process when developing new strategies, policies and major decisions.

 

The first objective of this motion is to conduct a collaborative workshop with residents and community stakeholders on how Council can develop new techniques to collaborate with our community. 

 

Lane Cove Council Website

 

In a digital first world, it is the community expectation that the Lane Cove Council website is customer centric, easy to use, easily readable and accessible and inclusive of all members of the community.

 

The Lane Cove Council website and other digital assets (social media channels, e-newsletter databases) are often our first and most regular touch point with the community. As the Covid-19 pandemic has shown, it is important for our community to be able to conduct business with us online. 

 

Currently there is frustration within our community due to a perceived inability to find information on the website, and a sense that communication from the council needs to be generally improved.

The current website is not mobile friendly. Navigating to find information is challenging and it does not provide ‘easy-read’ options or content in plain English. The website also lacks simple additions to improve accessibility for the disabled community such as alt text options to accompany images. 

 

There are limited options on the ‘request a service’ which could be expanded to ‘log an issue or ask for action’. The DA portal does not have all documents uploaded, for example when Northern Sydney Planning Panel makes a judgment it is not necessarily uploaded in a timely manner. Links on the website are challenging to share with TRIM as the links keep changing, not all fees are payable online and there are missing ‘404’ pages. The website layout also makes it difficult to locate relevant studies and impact assessments for proposed developments. Residents are often left to review individual council meeting agenda papers and minutes to search for relevant attachments. 

 

The website pages also currently ranks poorly on Google. The homepage isn’t found by searching “Lane Cove Council”. This could be improved with search engine optimisation of the website.

 

To bring our website in line with community expectation, it needs a comprehensive redevelopment of its design and content using a community-first, user research-driven approach. 

 

It is vital that we ensure all of Lane Cove’s digital assets aim to meet the best practice requirements of the Australian Government’s Digital Transformation Agency. Their website (https://www.dta.gov.au/) has useful information and guidelines.

 

Some examples of easy to navigate, user friendly sites include https://www.georgesriver.nsw.gov.au/  and https://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/ 

 

There is also potential for Lane Cove Council’s other digital communication channels to be improved to ensure we continue to share with our community essential information and news about council services, programs, and projects.

 

Beyond the accessibility of the website, we also recognise that the community needs better opportunities for genuine input into council decision making. 

 

The second objective of this motion is to improve Council’s website and how it integrates with Council’s other communication channels to make it easier for residents to engage and seek information from our Council.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:-

 

1.   Council engage an external consultant to host an interactive combined community and council workshop in the month of April to seek input from local community groups and residents about new inclusive strategies to engage with the public within the framework of the Community Participation Plan and Community Engagement Policy;

 

2.   Councillors receive a copy of the terms of reference prior to the engagement of the consultant outlined in point 1 above; and

3.   Council consider the following initiatives as key actions in the next Delivery Program and Operational Plan:- 

 

a.   Prioritising and allocating funding for an upgrade of the Lane Cove Council website in the 2022/2023 financial year and that the development ensures involvement of local user testing to ensure it meets the access needs of the Lane Cove community and follows best practice guidelines for government service website design;

 

b.   Forming a temporary Digital Transformation Working Group to support the development of Council’s digital communications which should include digital experts (service design and/or user experience design experts, digital content strategists, web developers, product managers, for example) and representatives of the general community as determined by the Mayor and General Manager, to provide input into the scope of the project; and

 

c.   Preparing an options paper on:-

 

i.    How Council’s existing and potential digital and other communication channels can be improved and integrated as a formal source of engagement and feedback in the Community Participation Plan and Community Engagement Policy. 

 

ii.    How Council can utilise initiatives such as search engine marketing, adoption of an ‘opt-in’ text messaging service; and further segmentation of Council’s email database to achieve more efficient and targeted communication to segments of our community.

 

Councillor Kathy Bryla

Councillor

 

Councillor Rochelle Flood

Councillor

 

Councillor Bridget Kennedy

Councillor

 

Councillor David Roenfeldt

Councillor

 

Councillor Merri Southwood

Councillor

 

Councillor Andrew Zbik

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - Bob Campbell Working Group - Additional Members

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - Bob Campbell Working Group - Additional Members    

Record No:    SU5606 - 8289/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor Scott Bennison; Councillor David Brooks-Horn; Councillor Katherine Mort 

 

 

Background

 

At the Extraordinary Meeting of Council held on 24 January 2022, Council resolved to establish a BCO working group but failed to include some major sporting club stakeholders.

 

Sporting groups are the main user of these grounds and were disappointed that they were not all specifically included in the new BCO working group.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the General Manager contact all the sporting clubs that currently use Bob Campbell Oval and invite them to have representation on the BCO working group.

 

Councillor Scott Bennison

Councillor

 

Councillor David Brooks-Horn

Councillor

 

Councillor Katherine Mort

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Notice of Motion - St Leonards South Central Precinct Land Acquisition for Open Space Park

 

 

Subject:          Notice of Motion - St Leonards South Central Precinct Land Acquisition for Open Space Park    

Record No:    SU6005 - 8047/22

Division:         Lane Cove Council

Author(s):      Councillor David Roenfeldt; Councillor Merri Southwood 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report seeks to prioritise the purchase of properties to create the central park between Park Road and Berry Road using one or more suitable sources of funding, including other State and Federal Grants as part of the St Leonards South Central Precinct (SLSCP).

 

Discussion

 

The strategic plan for the development of the SLS precinct is set out in the DPIE 2036 Plan.

 

Contained within the plan are the provisions for 0.96 hectares of Open Space in St Leonards South to service an expected population of 4,031, which includes land acquisition for a proposed new park. The required land acquisition includes properties at 19, 21, 23, 25, Berry Road and 16, 18, 18A, 20, 22, 24 Park Road St Leonards. The proposed park location is Identified as 1 shown below.

A picture containing application

Description automatically generated

 

The label for the local park is 1, pocket parks are 2a and 2b, and the expansion of Newlands Park is 3. Source: SLSCP

The cost of acquiring the land is given as $37,604,455 (March 2021).

 

IPART Assessment of St Leonards South Precinct Contributions Plan

 

The sources of funding available to deliver open space as defined in the DPIE 2036 Plan are: -

 

1.   Special Infrastructure Contributions (SIC) Scheme

The SIC will generate up to $116.6 million to be spent in the area to help fund new and upgraded public parks, active transport, education facilities and improvements to intersections and crossings.

The SIC allocates more than $78 million for open space - an increase of more than $20 million. SIC funding will be prioritised for additional open space. This includes, working with North Sydney Council to bring forward development contributions for a new park with underground parking at Holtermann Street carpark and working with Lane Cove and Willoughby City Councils on open space opportunities.

2.   Precinct Support Scheme

The Precinct Support Scheme is a State Government grant program to help fund the delivery of open spaces including parks, streetscapes, bicycle, and walking paths to support areas subject to urban renewal and sustainable growth. DPIE has allocated $10.6 million across the three councils to help deliver new local infrastructure.

3.   Local Infrastructure Contributions*

Each Council has a Development Contributions Plan that funds local infrastructure. Existing local infrastructure contributions will continue to apply to help fund the local infrastructure identified by each Council and this Plan to support future growth. It will be the responsibility of each Council to ensure their respective Development Contribution Plans remain updated.

4.   State and local Voluntary Planning Agreements

Section 7.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 allows a developer to enter into a voluntary planning agreement (VPA) to provide State or local infrastructure associated with a change to planning controls or a development application. This is an available avenue to provide infrastructure in St Leonards and Crows Nest in lieu of a contribution to the SIC or local contribution schemes.

* Note: As part of the NSW Government’s response to the COVID 19 pandemic, the timing of when local infrastructure contributions were due was delayed until at least the issuing of the first occupation certificate. This directive is due to expire March 22, 2022. Council estimates if this directive became permanent this would cause a delay of at least two years.  Local infrastructure contributions policy - (nsw.gov.au)


Other sources of funding mechanisms: -

5.   Borrowing

 

·      The IPART SLS CP review recommends that Council should investigate funding the new local park earlier, including consideration of borrowing an amount up to $37 million.

It has also been suggested (not from IPART SLS CP) that once the properties have been acquired, they could be leased back to existing owners or new tenants until such time as the construction of the park is due to commence. 

Existing Council Resolution

 

The Council resolution of 11 May 2020 made it clear that acquisition of sites was a priority:-

 

“K.       Prioritise the purchase of properties to create the central park between Park Rd and Berry Rd as s7.11 contributions are received, and Council receive a report annually as part of the budget process on progress of acquiring the properties.”

 

Note that the IPART SLS CP was completed 20 December 2021 with the following recommendation: -


“Council should investigate funding the new local park earlier in the development timeline, before incorporating changes in the next review of SLS CP in 3 years’ time.”

 

Our final recommendations have considered submissions to our Draft Report from the Council

and affected landowners. The key issue from the submissions is the timing of delivering the new

local park. Currently, the Council plans to acquire land for the park late in the plan’s development

Timeline.

 

We considered the impact of this delay on incoming residents, landowners and the Council’s

ratepayers. We also considered the impact of forward funding the park on the Council’s finances.

We maintain our recommendation that the Council should investigate funding the park earlier in

the development timeline, but to incorporate changes when it next revises the plan in 3 years’

time. We consider that this approach would balance: -

 

·         The risks to Council’s financial position of delivering the local park;

·         The risk of increasing land prices creating a contributions shortfall, that may need to be funded by future incoming residents or potentially by Council ratepayers; and

·         Council managing the disruption to existing residents, to better align the delivery of the park to the development within the precinct, which has not yet commenced.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:-

 

1.   Recommit to prioritising the purchase of properties to create the central park between Park Rd and Berry Rd using one or more suitable sources of funding, including other State and Federal Grants;

2.   Write to and seek a meeting with the Hon. Anthony Roberts, Minister for Planning and Housing, drawing to his attention the matters raised in this motion and requesting his assistance to identify possible solutions to bring forward funding and delivery of the central park. 

3.   Provide periodic updates to the ten property owners of the land scheduled to be included the park, on progress of the matter.

 

Councillor David Roenfeldt

Councillor

 

Councillor Merri Southwood

Councillor

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Representation on Council Advisory Committees and Other External Organisations for 2022

 

 

Subject:          Representation on Council Advisory Committees and Other External Organisations for 2022    

Record No:    SU868 - 79153/21

Division:         Corporate Services Division

Author(s):      Stephen Golding 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council currently operates various Advisory Committees and participates in other External Organisations to provide a forum for discussion on broad local and regional issues among Council representatives, local agencies and community members. The purpose of this report is to determine Councillor representation on these Committees for the period ending September 2022 and commence a process by which community representatives can express an interest in joining Advisory Committees.

 

Discussion

 

Advisory Committees and external organisations provide an excellent opportunity for Councillors, members of the community and other stakeholders to come together to discuss and address matters relevant to the charter and terms of reference of each committee. Councillors represent Council on a number of Advisory Committees and External Organisations, a list of these Committees and Organisations, their purpose, representation and meeting frequency is summarised below: -

 

Advisory Committees with Community Representatives

 

Age Friendly Advisory Committee

 

Established in July 2014 to provide advice and assistance to Council on the implementation of the Age Friendly Action Plan including prioritisation and awareness of strategies and initiatives. The Committee meets at least bi-monthly on Thursdays at 5.30 pm in the Council building. THE Committee’s Charter allows for up to twelve (12) Community Representatives; four (4) Alternate Community Members and two Council Members (one Councillor, one member of staff).

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Bushland Management Advisory Committee

 

Commenced in the 1980’s to discuss bushland management issues, monitor implementation of the Bushland Plan of Management and provide advice and recommendations on bushland management within the LGA. The Committee meets monthly on a Wednesday at 6.00pm in the Council Committee Room. The Committee includes four (4) Community Representatives, three (3) representatives of the Lane Cove Bushland and Conservation Society, one (1) member from an active Bushcare Group and one (1) Councillor and one (1) member of staff.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Lane Cove Access and Inclusion Committee

 

The Committee was formed to increase and promote general awareness of access, mobility and safety issues in the community. The Committee oversees implementation of advice and recommendations to the Disability Inclusion Action Plan. The Committee meets quarterly on Wednesday at 10.00am in the Council building. The Charter allows for up to 13 Community Members (including five service providers organisations), one Councillor and three appropriate staff as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Lane Cove Bicycle Advisory Committee

 

The Committee provides advice, recommendations on bicycle issues, facilities and significant input into the development of the Lane Cove Bicycle Plan. This Committee meets quarterly in the Council Committee Room at 6.00pm. The Committee’s Charter provides for up to seven (7) community representatives with cycling interests, three (3) Business Representatives with bicycle-related business in the LGA, and one (1) Councillor, one (1) Alternate Councillor and two (2) appropriate staff as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Lane Cove Festival Committee

 

The Committee organises the Lane Cove Festival and provides advice and recommendations to the General Manager on the Festival. The Committee meets from February to August and in October on the third Thursday of the month at 6.00pm in the Council building. The Committee’s Charter provides for up to twelve (12) community representatives, up to three (3) Councillors and one (1) appropriate staff member as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Lane Cove Public Art Advisory Committee

 

The Committee provides advice, critique, and comment on the ongoing development, guidance, and implementation of the Lane Cove Council Public Art Policy in relation to public art projects valued above $70,000. The Committee’s Charter provides for up to seven (7) community members, four (4) Councillors and two (2) non-voting members of staff as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Lane Cove Recreation Precinct Advisory Committee

 

This Committee discusses issues with the current tenants and other stakeholders regarding the development of the Golf Course sports precinct. The Committee’s Charter provides for seven (7) community representatives (with three (3) having an interest in sports that are to be accommodated at the facility, two (2) representatives of the Golf Country Club and two (2) having an interest in town planning/architecture or urban design). The charter provides for up to four (4) Councillors to be on the Committee and staff members as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

Sustainability Advisory Committee

 

The Committee provides advice on the formulation, prioritisation and implementation of strategies and initiatives to achieve sustainability as primarily set out in the Sustainability Action Plan. The Committee meets five (5) times a year on a Wednesday at 6.00pm in the Council Chambers. The Committee’s Charter allows for up to total of nine (9) community representatives: five (5) community representatives with one (1) alternate plus one (1) youth representative; or six (6) community representatives with one (1) alternate if there is no youth representative; two (2) local business representatives with a focus on sustainable business practices; one (1) representative nominated by Bushland Management Advisory Committee and up to three (3) Councillors and appropriate members of staff as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Advisory Committees without Community Representatives

 

Carisbrook Advisory Committee

 

Carisbrook is the oldest surviving house in its area, purchased in 1969. The House and Gardens are managed and maintained by Council with the Lane Cove Historical Society managing the furnishing and showing of the House. The Committee includes one (1) Councillor, one (1) Alternate Councillor and two (2) members of staff, to assist in setting the direction and to provide advice and recommendations on Carisbrook House. The Committee meets every six weeks on Wednesdays at 9.30am in the Council building.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Council Selection Committee

 

This Committee considers nominations and provides recommendations to the General Manager for Council's Citizenship Awards, Australia Day Awards, community appointments to Council’s Advisory Committees, tenders, grants, and other awards as they arise. Committee meetings are held as required during Council Workshops on the second Monday of the month. All Councillors and the General Manager are members of the Committee.

 

Proposed Representation: All Councillors and the General Manager.

 

Internal Audit Committee

 

This Committee provides independent assurance and assistance to Council on risk management, audit, governance, and external accountability responsibilities. The role of the Committee is also to provide advice and recommendations to the General Manager on business functions and processes that have been the subject of an internal audit. There are two (2) independent external representatives on the Committee, one Councillor and various senior staff. The Committee meets quarterly at Council, on a Thursday at 2.30pm

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and one Alternate Councillor)

 

Publications Editorial Committee

 

This Committee of three (3) Councillors provides advice to the General Manager on the draft Quarterly Newsletter to the community and any other relevant publications. The Committee meets on an ‘as required basis’ in the Council Committee Room in the Civic Centre at 6.00pm prior to Council Meetings.

 

Proposed Representation: Three Councillors (one being the Mayor)

 

 

 

 

Lane Cove Literary Awards Committee

 

This Committee was established to organise the annual Lane Cove Literary Awards competition. The competition normally opens in May and closes in August, with the awards ceremony in November. The Committee of up to three (3) Councillors, the General Manager (or his representative) and appropriate staff as determined by the General Manager, meets as and when required.

 

Proposed Representation: Two Councillors

 

Councillor appointments to External Organisations

 

Centrehouse Management Committee

 

Gallery Lane Cove + Creative Studios is managed by this Committee. Gallery Lane Cove + Creative Studios, is a not-for-profit community art and leisure centre offering leisure learning for the community, and facilities for hire. The Management Committee meets on the 1st Wednesday of each month at Gallery Lane Cove at 5.30 p.m. As this is an external Committee, the role of the Committee is governed by Centrehouse Management Committee, with one Councillor being appointed.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and an Alternate Councillor)

 

Lane Cove Retirement Units Association Ltd Board

 

Council purchased land in Central Avenue in 1966 for the development of units and transferred the land to the Association in 1994. The Association, a company limited by Guarantee, seeks to provide suitable accommodation for aged persons capable of independent living, and manages the land and buildings at Pottery Gardens.

The Board meets six (6) times a year on a Tuesday at 6:45pm As this is an external Committee the role of the Committee is governed by the Lane Cove Retirement Units Association, whose constitution provides for two (2) Councillor representatives.

 

Proposed Representation: Two Councillors (and an Alternate Councillor)

 

Northern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils – (NSROC)

 

NSROC is a voluntary group of eight-member Councils in the Northern Sydney region who have joined together on policy advocacy for the region, professional development of staff, shared service delivery and joint procurement. The Board of the organisation meets quarterly on Thursday evenings.

As this is an external organisation, the role of the Board is governed by the constitution of NSROC, which is an incorporated association. The Mayor’s alternate must be the person acting as Mayor at the time, the Deputy Mayor ordinarily.

 

Proposed Representation:  The Mayor and one other Councillor (and two Alternate Councillors)

 

NSW Public Libraries Association (Inc.)

 

The NSW Public Libraries Association (NSWPLA) is the peak body for public libraries across NSW providing Advocacy, Network Opportunities, Professional Development and Recognition. NSWPLA includes Councillors in its executive committee, and this representation provides NSWPLA with a broader political focus, including a strong relationship with Local Government NSW. There are three (3) Thursday evening Combined Sydney Zones Meetings held within the Sydney Metropolitan area (usually February, May and July) and a statewide Annual Conference (November) held at different locations across the state. The Annual Conference includes the Annual General Meeting. As this is an external Committee, the role of the Association is governed by the constitution of the NSWPLA. Representation includes one Councillor (with an Alternate Councillor) and staff as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and an Alternate Councillor)

 

Shorelink Committee

 

Established in 1983 when five (and currently three) participating councils signed a Deed of Agreement. The Shorelink Library Network links the three Lower North Shore Council Libraries of Lane Cove, Mosman and Stanton (North Sydney). Shorelink is managed by a joint committee operating under Section 355 of the Local Government Act 1993. This Committee consists of Councillor and Library Manager representatives. The Agent Council (currently North Sydney) Librarian directs the operations of the Network Office in accordance with the Shorelink Committee and the Library Managers Committee. The Committee meets Wednesday evenings twice a year (March, November) with different Shorelink Councils hosting the meetings on a rotational basis. As this is an external Committee, the role of the Committee is governed by Shorelink.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and an Alternate Councillor)

 

Willoughby/Ryde/Hunters Hill/Lane Cove District Bushfire Committee

 

This Committee was established to meet the requirements of the Rural Fires Act in minimising the impact of bushfires on the community and approves priorities and locations for hazard reduction works. Representatives are from the four Councils, National Parks and Wildlife Service, NSW Police Service, TollAust and NSW Fire Brigades. The Committee meets quarterly at the Lane Cove Fire Station, Artarmon at 10.00am on a Thursday. Representation includes one Councillor and staff as determined by the General Manager.

 

Proposed Representation: One Councillor (and an Alternate Councillor)

 

Expressions of Interest for Community Representatives on Advisory Committees

 

Calls for expressions of interest for community representatives on Council Advisory Committees will commence in late February 2022 and conclude in late March 2022. A selection committee will provide recommendations on community representative appointments and will tabled for discussion at the April Council meeting.

 

It is worth noting that Council passed a resolution in May 2021 in relation to limiting the tenure of advisory committee members to a maximum of two (2) council terms. In accordance with the resolution passed, the matter was referred to Council’s Internal Audit Committee to form a view from a ‘good governance’ perspective.

 

The Internal Audit Committee considered the matter with the following recommendation being minuted in October 2021:

 

·    The aspirational intent to retain approximately 50% of members every 4 years and limit tenure to 2 terms (8 years) is considered reasonable, noting this will depend on the calibre of those that express an interest in becoming a member

·    Ongoing mentoring among members should be encouraged so as to maintain interest and assist with succession planning

·    Succession planning is critical so as not to lose knowledge, as turnover is inevitable

·    Periodically rotating the Chair, where practicable, so as to give all members of the Committee the opportunity/experience to expand their engagement/participation within the Committee, and

·    Consider inviting ‘external subject matter and/or technical experts’ (including former members) to contribute to the knowledge of all committee members with the business at hand

The above recommendation is put to Council to consider whether it should apply in the assessment of nominations received by Council from prospective community representatives for Advisory Committees and be incorporated in revised Committee Charters upon formation of the new Council Advisory Committees for 2022.   

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:-

 

1.   Council determine Councillor representation on Advisory Committees and External Organisations for the period ending September 2022.

 

2.   Council authorise all Councillor representatives on Advisory Committees to arrange an alternate as required;

 

3.   Advisory Committee Charters be amended where necessary to reflect Councillor Representation; and

 

4.   Council determine its position in relation to the recommendations made by the Internal Audit Committee as they relate to membership tenure in Council Advisory Committees.

 

Steven Kludass

Executive Manager - Corporate Services

Corporate Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Infrastructure Contributions Reforms - Submissions

 

 

Subject:          Infrastructure Contributions Reforms - Submissions     

Record No:    SU6136 - 5327/22

Division:         Corporate Services Division

Author(s):      Steven Kludass 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report serves to advise Council that two submissions were lodged, both in relation to the NSW State Government’s proposed Infrastructure Contribution Reforms, one of which was lodged with the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) and the other with the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) following the final Ordinary Council Meeting on 15 November 2021.

 

Copies of both submissions are attached to this report as AT-1 and AT-2.  

 

Background

 

At the Ordinary Council Meeting of 15 November 2021, Council considered a report titled ‘Update Infrastructure Contribution Reforms’ that outlined a chronology of events that led to the proposed NSW State Government Infrastructure Contribution Reforms, together with an outline of the proposed reforms and commentary on the likely impacts for both the local government sector generally and the Lane Cove community specifically. The resolution passed by Council at the 15 November 2021 Ordinary Council Meeting read as follows:-

 

1.   The report be received and noted;

2.   The General Manager be delegated authority to make any submission consistent with Council’s previous resolutions to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal by 26 November 2021 and the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment by 10 December 2021; and

 

3.   A report be submitted to the February 2022 Council Meeting, outlining the submissions lodged and providing the opportunity for Council to make any additional submissions.

 

Given the pending local government elections at the time, DPIE advised they would accept   additional submissions beyond the 10 December 2021 deadline to enable newly elected Councils to consider the matter. At the time of preparing the 15 November 2021 Council Report, IPART had indicated they were not able to accept late submissions as they were required to finalise their report by 31 December 2021.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following discussion is an extract of information previously presented to Council on 15 November 2021.

 

Discussion

 

The NSW Government is proposing wide ranging reforms to the Infrastructure Contributions system. There are a large suite of documents, covering three key areas of the reform:-

 

Local contributions

Contributions and land use planning

Regional contributions

 

1.  Draft regulations and explanatory paper

2.  Land value contribution paper and case studies (Greenfield sites)

3. Practice note policy paper and modules:-

·   Principles of infrastructure contributions

·   Selecting the most appropriate local contribution mechanism 

·   What can be funded through section 7.11 and 7.12 local infrastructure contributions

·   Making a section 7.11 contributions plan Making a section

·   7.12 contributions plan

·   Exhibition

·   Borrowing and forward funding

·   Infrastructure contributions for mining and energy developments

1.   Ministerial Directions:

·   Local infrastructure contributions planning proposal

·   Dual and shared use of open space and public facilities Draft practice note:

2.   Draft practice note:

·    Contributions plans and planning proposals

1.  Regional Infrastructure Contribution Discussion paper

2.  Regional Infrastructure Contribution Explanation of Intended Effect

3.  Regional Infrastructure Contribution Governance and Prioritisation guidelines

4.  Regional Infrastructure Contribution Infrastructure Delivery Agreements guidelines

5.  State Planning Agreements guidelines

6.  Feasibility Analysis

 

Local Contributions

 

The NSW Government has revised their original thinking on the proposed reforms to infrastructure contributions in response to the advocacy work from local government. There has been a general commitment to councils being ‘no worse off’, however this appears to be in the short term rather than ongoing.

 

Of significance to Lane Cove is that Council’s general s7.11 Contributions Plan can remain unaltered for three years. Specifically, any plan adopted before 1 July 2022 is not required to be reviewed and re-made prior to 1 July 2024 (councils will be able to apply for an extension if necessary). See the EP&A Regulation: Explanatory Paper.

 

 

 

 

The key issue post 2024 is that IPART has not provided any differentiation between brownfield areas and greenfield areas in determining what types of infrastructures councils will able to levy for post 2024. Currently, councils which levy contributions under the $20,000 cap (Lane Cove) imposed by the NSW Government are not subject to complying with the IPART Essential Works List, which is used in the assessment of contribution plans above the $20,000 cap. This list places restrictions of what a Council can and can’t recover from development contributions. IPART’s most recent review has not resulted in the list being changed significantly.

 

Of concern to Lane Cove is that the list excludes levying for social infrastructure (including but not limited to libraries, halls and child care centres) and introduces the concept of ‘base cost’, limiting the standard of open space embellishments. Documents that had been previously exhibited suggested that a decision on whether the Essential Works List applies to all futures plans (i.e. not only the ones considered by IPART) will not be made until closer to the 2024 date when all plans must be reviewed.

 

This will have significant impacts on Council in the future as contributions for community facilities are a major component within the existing plan. To provide a more thorough understanding of the financial implications, GLN Planning (engaged by NSROC) refined the modelling previously undertaken, to assist member councils to illustrate the financial impacts of the proposed reforms.

 

Whilst ever the EP&A Act provides for the Minister to control what infrastructure can be levied under the contributions system, there will be significant risks to all councils in being able to ensure infrastructure keeps pace with population growth, a stated goal of the NSW Government. This is inconsistent with the State’s levying of contributions for infrastructure, which are not restricted as to what they can be collected for.

 

Contributions and land use planning

 

This area is generally supported, with Contribution Plans to be established at the rezoning (planning proposal) stage, where a precinct is to be rezoned. This was the approach used by Council in the St Leonards South Precinct and it is now proposed to be mandatory.

 

Regional Contributions

 

The NSW Government currently operates a Special Infrastructure Contributions (SIC) system, which supports growing communities by levying a contribution from development to help recover the cost of state and regional roads, public transport infrastructure, pedestrian and cycling paths, health facilities, emergency services, schools and open space improvements. The intention is to phase these out and replace them with Regional Infrastructure Contributions.

 

Councils have expressed concern about the Governance arrangements for the new Regional Infrastructure Contributions, which seek to utilise a broad-based levy on all development in the Sydney region of $12,000 per house/town-house and $10,000 per residential unit. The advantage of the current SIC process is that the contributions are spent in the area that they are collected, for example St Leonards / Crows Nest has a SIC. The RIC is collected and is to be spent in Greater Sydney with no further subdivision, which is a large area and removes any concept of nexus. Also, as there is no requirement for an expenditure plan, there is ongoing concerns about the transparency and use of the funds as any proposed protections are not within the Act.

 

Conclusion

 

Given the wide-ranging impacts of the NSW State Government’s proposed Infrastructure Contributions Reforms, it imperative that Council, in representing its community’s interests, reaffirm its submissions to both the IPART and the DPIE within the specified deadlines.

 

Council has been working with a group of Sydney metropolitan councils led by the City of Sydney in opposing the proposed reforms and putting forward alternate suggestions to the State Government. Council will continue to work with this group and NSROC, which has prepared the ‘lead’ Motion to the upcoming LGNSW Special Conference on the issue, as follows:

 

“That Local Government NSW reaffirms its position that councils should not be worse off under

infrastructure contribution reforms and that this continue to be pursued vigorously with the NSW

Government including:-

 

1.         Changes to the legislation and policy framework to ensure that councils’ capacity to provide infrastructure for their communities is not diminished.

2.         Asking that the government demonstrate to each local council how its modelling concludes that each Council will not be worse off.

3.         Requiring the Regional Infrastructure Contribution in the Greater Sydney Region to be spent in the District from which it was collected as defined specifically for the purpose of strategic regional planning in A Metropolis for Three Cities and accompanying District Plans.

4.         In regions outside of Greater Sydney, requiring the Regional Infrastructure Contribution to be spent in the Region from which it was collected as defined specifically for the purpose of strategic regional planning in the relevant Regional Plan.

 

As the DPIE has agreed to extend its deadline to February 2022, it presents an opportunity for the newly elected Council to make an additional submission should it wish to do so.  

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:-

 

1.   Acknowledge and endorse the two submissions already lodged with the IPART and the DPIE; and

 

2.   Determine whether an additional submission be lodged with the DPIE and, if so, outline what key points should be included in the submission. 

 

Steven Kludass

Executive Manager - Corporate Services

Corporate Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

IPART Submission - Review of the Essential Works List Nexus Efficiency and Standardised Benchmark Costs

4 Pages

 

AT‑2 View

Council Submission to DPIE - Infrastructure Contributions Reform - December 2021

5 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

IPART Submission - Review of the Essential Works List Nexus Efficiency and Standardised Benchmark Costs

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


ATTACHMENT 2

Council Submission to DPIE - Infrastructure Contributions Reform - December 2021

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Traffic Committee - January 2022

 

 

Subject:          Traffic Committee - January 2022    

Record No:    SU1326 - 6457/22

Division:         Open Space and Urban Services Division

Author(s):      Sashika Perera 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Lane Cove Traffic Committee has met and has submitted recommendations for Council’s consideration. It is recommended that the recommendations of the Committee be adopted.

 

Background

 

The Lane Cove Traffic Committee is a requirement of Transport for NSW and is primarily a technical review committee, which provides advice the Council on matters referred to it by Council. These matters must be related to prescribed traffic control devices and traffic control facilities for which Council has delegated authority. The Committee makes has no decision-making powers, it makes recommendations for the Council to consider, but the Council is not bound by the advice.

 

Discussion

 

The Lane Cove Traffic Committee Meeting was held on Tuesday, 18 January 2022. The Agenda is included as AT-1. The Traffic Committee recommendations are shown in the Minutes of the Meeting, included as AT-2.

 

The January 2022 Traffic Committee Minutes also include the following items approved by the General Manager under delegated authority in December 2021, in order to allow their early implementation:-

 

·    Burns Bay Road/Tambourine Bay Road Traffic Signals

Approval of new signage a ‘Buses Excepted’ for a Right Turn from Tambourine Bay Road to Burns Bay Road

 

·    Marshall Lane and Canberra Avenue, St Leonards

Approval of the partial closure of Marshall Lane and Canberra Avenue for construction of the St Leonards Over Rail Green Space and Canberra Avenue (North) shared zone works.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council adopt the recommendations of the Lane Cove Traffic Committee Meeting held on Tuesday, 18 January 2022.

 

 

 

Martin Terescenko

Executive Manager - Open Space and Urban Services

Open Space and Urban Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Agenda - Traffic Committee - January 2022 - Final

25 Pages

 

AT‑2 View

Minutes - Traffic Committee - January 2022

39 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

Agenda - Traffic Committee - January 2022 - Final

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


ATTACHMENT 2

Minutes - Traffic Committee - January 2022

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator





PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Bob Campbell Oval - Proposed Delivery Program

 

 

Subject:          Bob Campbell Oval - Proposed Delivery Program    

Record No:    SU8695 - 7111/22

Division:         Open Space and Urban Services Division

Author(s):      Ted Webster 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council called an extraordinary meeting on 24 January 2022 where it was resolved to adopt a revised Master Plan for Bob Campbell Oval, cancel the proposed synthetic sportsfield and to install an improved natural turf sportsfield on Bob Campbell Oval (BCO). 

 

This report outlines the probable indication of time involved to achieve this outcome with appropriate milestones. The report also confirms the Hon Anthony Roberts MP, Minister for Planning and Minister for Homes and the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment has been advised of Councils intensions to revise the Master Plan whilst maintaining requirements of the Precinct Support Scheme funding agreement.

 

Background

 

Council at its meeting of 24 January 2022 resolved that: -

 

1.   Confirms that it will not proceed with the Bob Campbell Oval Master Plan endorsed at the meeting of Council on 16 November 2020 (the endorsed Master Plan)….

 

4.   Immediately cease all works and other acts associated with the delivery of the Master Plan endorsed in resolution 183/2020.

 

5.   Advise all parties, as soon as practicable after this meeting, that have contracts with Council or with other parties that relate to the delivery of the endorsed Master Plan that no further work is to be carried out in relation to the delivery of the endorsed Master Plan

 

6.   Advise the Hon Anthony Roberts MP, Minister for Planning and Minister for Homes and the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment of Council’s resolution and advise that it is Council’s intention to develop a new proposal for Bob Campbell Oval that will meet the eligibility criteria of the Precinct Support Scheme and that Council will submit the required Project Variation after finalisation of the revised Master Plan for approval.

 

10. Requests the General Manager to table at the 21 February 2022 meeting of Council (or as soon as practicable thereafter) a proposed program for the delivery of the revised Master Plan, including but not limited to: -

 

i.    appropriate community consultation;

ii.    Council endorsement of the revised Master Plan and specifications for a natural turf sportsfield;

iii.   compliance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning,

iv.  Assessment Act and other legislation;

v.   completion of tender processes (if required); and

vi.  award of contracts required to deliver all elements of the revised Master Plan.

 

12. Affirms that it is the intention of Council to deliver the revised Master Plan to the highest possible standard and that Council will not work to deadlines that may compromise the quality of delivery of the elements in the plan.

 

16. Notify parties with which it has contracts related to the endorsed Master Plan of the resolution of this meeting and to undertake negotiations consequent upon this resolution.

 

17. Receive a report to the Council meeting of 21 February 2022 (or, if required, in an extraordinary meeting convened for this purpose) as to the outcome of any negotiations with contracting parties in relation to the decision of Council to not proceed with the endorsed Master Plan and to secure Council approval of any proposed terms of settlement in relation thereto.

Discussion

 

Consistent with resolution number 6 Council has advised the Hon Anthony Roberts MP of Council’s intention to develop a new proposal for Bob Campbell Oval that will meet the eligibility criteria of the Precinct Support Scheme and that Council will submit the required variation request after finalisation of the revised Master Plan for approval.

 

The proposed program for the delivery is tabled below addressing resolution number 10 and 12. Each task has been outlined in the process; from community consultation through to awarding contracts for the construction of the Master Plan elements.  The program proposes a best- and worst-case scenario of timeframes for each task, these are shown as Weeks (min) and Weeks (max) respectively. The comments column provides further clarification were necessary.

 

Proposed program for the delivery from 1 February 2022

 

Item

Weeks (min)

Weeks (max)

comments

Develop Request for Quote (RFQ) with Scope of works for procuring Landscape Architect

1

1

Complete – 7 professional firms with sportsfield experience

Market response to RFQ

2

2

 

Review quotes and recommend preferred consultant

1

2

 May be part of a multi-discipline firm

HOLDPOINT - Council meeting

Monday 21 March

Councillors to endorse preferred consultant 

Engage successful Landscape Architect. Council provide with all relevant details - on boarding

2

3

 

Prepare and convene working group for development of draft revised Master Plan BCO - appoint Mayor as chair of working group

2

4

 

Workshop 1 (wants and needs) - working group to develop Master Plan that includes natural turf sportsfield 

1

1

 

Landscape Architect drafts Masterplan

4

6

 

Workshop 2 - present proposal for feedback

1

1

 

Landscape Architect refines masterplan and related drawings

2

4

 

Landscape Architect presents revised Master Plan at Councillor workshop

1

1

 

HOLDPOINT - Council meeting

 

Councillors to endorse all aspects of Master Plan for consultation

Community consultation of Masterplan

6

8

 

Detailed design incorporating any changes from consultation

3

5

 

Final revision presented to Councillor workshop

 

 

 

HOLDPOINT - Council meeting

 

Councillors to endorse all aspects of Master Plan for tender development

Procure of Landscape Architect for design specification and tender documentation

3

4

Undertaken concurrently

Obtain a minimum of 3 quotes (including AgEnviro) to design the specifications for the natural turf and to supervise the works related to the installation of natural turf to be incorporated into for tender documentation

Review quotes and recommend preferred consultants

1

2

 

HOLDPOINT - Council meeting

Councillors to endorse preferred consultants

Engage successful Landscape Architect and turf consultant for tender documentation

1

2

 

Tender document finalised including design and specification documentation

8

10

 

Review of Environmental Factors (REF) and Part 5

4

7

May include use of existing REF

Tender process

4

5

 

Review tenders

2

3

 

Tender presented at Councillor’s workshop

 

 

 

HOLDPOINT - Council meeting

Councillors to endorse tenderer

Preferred tenderer recommended to Council for endorsement

 

 

49

71

 

 

As per resolution numbers 5 and 16 Council staff have negotiated with the contractor for termination of the contract for the construction of Stage 1 of the Master Plan. A confidential memorandum has been circulated separately to Councillors outlining a proposed confidential settlement of the matter.

 

The Review of Environmental Factors (REF) for the previous Master Plan has been completed. As part of this REF, Council included stabilisation works that are required for the cliff face located along the western boundary of the reserve. The need to undertake these works became apparent during the geotechnical assessment that was undertaken for the original Master Plan. As the stabilisation works are necessary for public safety, it is proposed to use the current REF to gain approval under delegated authority to complete the works under Part 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1979). Consistent with the intent of Council’s previous resolutions, the REF and Part 5 Report and determination will be published on Council’s website.

 

It is expected that 80% of the current REF will be able to be reused for the revised Master Plan that will be developed as per the above program.

 

Conclusion

 

The Hon Anthony Roberts MP has been advised on the resolution to revise the Bob Campbell Oval Master Plan acknowledging the need to meet the criteria in relation to the Precinct Support Scheme funding.  The proposed program for the delivery of the revised Master Plan incorporates community consultation through to awarding of the tender with contract. The program provides an indication of a minimum 49 weeks and a maximum of 71 weeks to reach the final milestone of awarding the tender for construction of the Master Plan. No indication of construction times has been included. Council will also terminate the contract as per the negotiated terms and undertake stabilisation works on the western cliff face.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:-

1.   report be received and noted; and

 

2.   the proposed program for delivery be endorsed;

 

3.   the General Manager be authorised to terminate the contract for construction of Stage 1 of the Master Plan as outlined in the Confidential Memorandum; and

 

4.   seek approval and complete the stabilisation works required along the western cliff face.

 

Martin Terescenko

Executive Manager - Open Space and Urban Services

Open Space and Urban Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Proposed Rezoning Reforms

 

 

Subject:          Proposed Rezoning Reforms    

Record No:    SU3486 - 4362/22

Division:         Environmental Services Division

Author(s):      Terry Tredrea; Christopher Pelcz 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this Report is to explain the changes being proposed to the system of amending councils’ planning controls in Local Environment Plans (LEPs), through “Planning Proposals” or (Rezonings). These changes are proposed by the Department of Planning & Environment (DPE) in response to consultation undertaken last year with “industry, councils and the planning profession”. In particular, they respond to views expressed that:

 

1.   “Planning proposals have unclear expectations”, and

2.   “Planning proposals are slow and need a smoother process.”

 

Some of the proposed changes include:

 

·    Mandatory pre-lodgement meetings for developer-initiated Planning Proposals;

·    DPE is no longer provides Gateways (unless Council-initiated) – this becomes Council’s role;

·    Agencies approached for advice at the initial scoping stage;

·    Proposals placed into one of four categories of complexity, with benchmark timeframes for each;

·    Applicant makes the decision to exhibit. Council has no binding assessment role for strategic merit at this stage (though they can advise on a likely outcome); 

·    Applicant manages the exhibition process, then summarises and responds to community and agency submissions (both directly and by modifying their proposal);

·    Applicant submits a report addressing the pre-lodgement issues raised by council;

·    Council finally assesses strategic/site-specific merit of the proposal after exhibition;

·    If not supported, the proponent has a ‘right to appeal’, whose proposal goes to Review by district planning panel;

·    Fees will be consistent throughout NSW, based on costs incurred by category.

 

DPE is exhibiting the Discussion Paper for comment until Monday 28 February 2022. It contains prompt questions, documents and an optional survey, and can be viewed on the DPE Planning Portal. Council has the option of:

 

·    Submitting responses from individual Councillors; and/or

·    Given the shortage of time, authorising the General Manager to submit broadly along lines agreed by Councillors in response to this report; or

·    Simply noting this report.

 

Background

 

Council received a report “Proposed Rezoning Reforms” to its August 2021 Council Meeting which highlighted the extensive reform package being undertaken by the NSW Government.

 

The latest reform focuses is on improvements to the existing rezoning process. DPE is proposing to speed up the rezoning process which are made by either private individuals such as developers, or by councils. Rezonings (through Planning Proposals) seek to amend planning controls in Council's Local Environment Plan (LEP). Typical changes usually relate to rezoning certain land, or changing permitted land uses, heights or densities.

 

The rational for these reforms is that the current process for making planning proposals is considered too slow, uncertain, complex and needing a smoother process. The current process is detailed in the recently updated Guidelines (AT-3). The proposed reforms aim for a 33% quicker, simpler system for changing Council's LEP planning controls. It emerged from the 2020 Planning Reform Action Plan. A further Discussion Paper (AT-2) outlines potential further reforms by posing a series of questions.

 

Discussion

 

To clarify the changes being proposed to the current Rezoning Process, they are discussed below in the order of the stages in the proposed new system. For simplicity, only proponent-initiated proposals are addressed. Council-initiated proposals are discussed where significantly different.

 

Scoping/ Preparation

 

Current Proponent-initiated Rezoning Process

Proposed changes to Proponent-initiated Process

Comment

Pre-lodgement meetings (optional – although Lane Cove engages its Local Planning Panel for advice)

Pre-lodgement meetings (mandatory)

 

Consult local planning panel only if a conflict of interest is unavoidable.

Support the mandatory pre-lodgement meeting - reduces time wasted later chasing information/reports.

 

Oppose the bypassing of current expert advice from Council’s Local Planning Panels. Note that draft Design & Place SEPP mandates a pre-lodgement Design Review Panel assessment for RFBs and similar. This is also mandated by 9.1 Ministerial Direction behind the Design & Place SEPP(“design considerations early in the planning process”).

Agencies not advised

Agencies identified, and comments canvassed

Support early agency request - reduces time wasted later chasing information/reports. No further detail is provided.

Submission requirements brief, excluding some information

Full standard submission requirements issued by Council, including studies, possible community concerns, strategic merit, timeframes, whom to consult, plus suggested (non-radical) changes. So, by lodgement the Proposal is “job-ready”.

Council (not DPE Gateway) needs assistance to set clear matters for consideration (including studies and exhibition timeframe). Effectively, Council must seek DPE advice.

‘Clock’ starts when Council accepts lodgement and assesses whether proposal has strategic/place-based merit, and so if it should proceed to DPE Gateway. If not, then an early “No”. Which means either “Never” or “make these non-radical changes” (recommended by LPP).

Council has no formal assessment role at this stage (can make comment).  ‘Clock’ does not start till post-consultation stage.

Oppose, as proponent may be actively exhibiting a strategically-flawed proposal, wasting their and community’s time.

DPE has recently introduced 4 categories of complexity, with proposed timeframes for delivery of each (Basic, Standard, Complex, Principal).

Placed by Council in one of 4 categories of complexity, with a shortened time-frame (see Notes below, and AT-1 & AT-2 for details)

Problematic, with potential to impose unrealistic timeframes where local conditions may complicate.

If not supported – proponent seeks independent Rezoning Review from district planning panel.

Independent review not necessary at this early stage.

Support the suggested opportunity under current system for planning panels to offer advice, rather than simply refuse or support. This is the advisory model adopted by Lane Cove Council’s Design Review and Design Excellence panels.

 

Lodgement

 

Current Proponent-initiated Rezoning Process

Proposed changes to Proponent-initiated Process

Comment

Council’s Local Planning Panel advises on * strategic/site-specific merit

Council affirms/does not affirm that required information/studies have been undertaken. Also exhibition details (unclear)

Oppose bypassing of current expert advice from Council’s Local Planning Panels.

If supported, Council submits proposal with supporting material to Planning Portal.

DPE conditions required studies / information to be provided (Gateway).

Applicant submits proposal, regardless of merit, with supporting material to Planning Portal.

Oppose as proponent may be actively exhibiting a strategically-flawed proposal, wasting their and community time. See “Strategic merit” (Note below).

DPE assesses merit of proposal. If not supported, process ends

DPE gives Council direction about agency etc referral + standard information requirements. Standard (shorter) timeframes apply.

Gateway “ensures there is sufficient justification for a planning proposal to

Progress.” Gateway sets initial conditions, timeframes & who to consult.

Undervalues DPE’s strategic oversite expertise in ensuring “sufficient justification” for Proposal to proceed.

DPE only assesses proposals prepared by councils and public authorities (& Category 3&4).

*NoteStrategic merit” = a. gives effect to the relevant strategic planning documents; b. consistent with the local strategic planning statement or supporting strategy; c. responds to a change in circumstances not yet recognised under existing planning. For more information, see AT-2, page 29.

 

Exhibition/Post-exhibition

 

Current Proponent-initiated Rezoning Process

Proposed changes to Proponent-initiated Process

Comment

Council manages exhibition + agency submissions

Proponent manages exhibition + agency submissions

Unclear how proponent-led exhibition can guarantee the relevant community catchment is consulted.

Council summarises and responds to submissions

Proponent summarises and responds to submissions

While proponent is likely to respond from viability, self-justifying, viewpoint (rather than strategic, public-interest perspective) they are allowed to respond in Development Application process which is then reviewed and discussed in the final assessment report. Overall, this can be supported provided that Councils can discuss the proponent’s response in the final assessment report.

Council amends proposal in response to submissions from community / agencies

Proponent amends proposal in response to submissions from community / agencies

No objection if Council could recommend further reasonable changes.

Fees are set and paid.

Fees based on category and costs incurred. A “planning guarantee” refunds fees if Council takes ‘too long’.

‘Too long’ is based on a benchmark that ignores potential complications.

*Note: Timeframes (by Category): (Basic = down from 28 to 26 weeks, Standard = down from 45 to 37 weeks, Complex = down from 60 to 48 weeks, Principal = down from 76 to 50 weeks). This time is recommended only, as “best practice guidelines”.

 

Assessment / Finalisation

 

Current Proponent-initiated Rezoning Process

Proposed changes to Proponent-initiated Process

Comment

Usually council initially assesses whether to support the proposal at Scoping stage.

Council finally now assesses whether to support the proposal post-exhibition. See AT-2 page 29)

Initial assessment late in the process may waste applicant’s/ community’s time.

Usually council drafts the proposed instrument’s wording in collaboration with the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office.

No change from current process.

If not supported, process ends (appeal for review occurred early at the Scoping stage).

If Gateway refusal is appealed against, proposal may return to council as the ongoing Planning Authority.

 

If not supported, proposal goes to Review by district planning panel.

 

Council can no longer be the Planning Authority.

Oppose moving review to the end of the process, if it prevents council rejecting proposal at the beginning.

However, there may be some merit in a later-stage independent review.

‘Clock’ started once proposal lodged (even when required information missing).

‘Clock” starts when proponent has responded to submissions (post-exhibition) and possibly amended proposal.

A fee refund if councils take too long to assess.

Support starting the timing once proposal leaves the proponent’s control (post-exhibition response).

 

Conclusion

 

Within this broad-ranging response to perceived shortcomings in the Rezoning process, there are several suggestions that can be supported:

 

·    Mandatory pre-lodgement meetings will reduce time wasted later chasing information/ reports;

·    Early agency requests will reduce time wasted later;

·    Suggestion that planning panels might have an early opportunity to offer advice, rather than simply refuse or support.

 

However, several suggestions are not supportable for the reasons briefly noted above:

 

·    The bypassing of current expert advice from Council’s Local Planning Panels;

·    Council takes on the DPE Gateway role to list all matters for consideration – which will require DPE strategic oversite expertise in ensuring “sufficient justification” for a proposal to proceed;

·    Four proposal categories may lead to unrealistic benchmark timeframes where local conditions are more complicated;

·    Council has no formal assessment role until a relatively late stage;

·    Proponent has the right to actively exhibit a strategically-flawed proposal, potentially wasting their and the community’s time;

·    It is unclear how a proponent-managed exhibition process will guarantee the relevant community catchment is consulted;

·    Moving independent review to the end of the process prevents council rejecting proposals at the beginning. Otherwise, there may be some merit in a late-stage independent review.

 

As feedback is expected by 28 February, it is recommended that Council authorise the General Manager to submit a response to the Discussion Paper in terms consistent with this report.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council authorise the General Manager to submit a response to the Discussion Paper as outlined in this report.

 

Mark Brisby

Executive Manager

Environmental Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Detailed Summary of Rezoning Reforms

8 Pages

 

AT‑2 View

A new approach to rezonings - Discussion paper

44 Pages

 

AT‑3 View

Guidelines for Plan-Making

81 Pages

Available Electronically

AT‑4 View

FAQs - Rezoning Reforms

4 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

Detailed Summary of Rezoning Reforms

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


ATTACHMENT 2

A new approach to rezonings - Discussion paper

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


ATTACHMENT 4

FAQs - Rezoning Reforms

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct - NSW Government Funding Opportunity

 

 

Subject:          Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct - NSW Government Funding Opportunity    

Record No:    SU7396 - 7901/22

Division:         General Managers Unit

Author(s):      David Stevens 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Council has the opportunity to seek a NSW Government grant of $5 million to partially fund construction of the Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct via the “Multi-Sport Community Facility Fund”. The NSW Government has committed $200 million to this fund, recognising the critical role sport infrastructure plays in keeping communities healthy, active and connected. Key objectives of the fund include: support the equitable provision of, and access to multi-sport facilities to grow sport participation for women and girls; increase the number and type of multi-sport facilities; and, increase the utilisation of sport facilities. The Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct meets the eligibility criteria for the Multi-Sport Community Facility Fund. Council has engaged Xypher Sport and Leisure to prepare a Business Case (AT-1) that focusses on the economic and social business case for the project. Council has separately engaged Colliers Strategic Advisory (Property) to investigate 10 alternative sites for the Sport and Recreation Precinct in the Lane Cove West Business Park to provide a comparison to the current proposal. It is recommended Council make application for the Grant and conduct a community information session to outline the business case to the community.

 

Background

 

Since 2010, the Lane Cove population has grown by 23.5%. Population growth in Greater Sydney for the same period was 17.9%, and in the Northern Sydney Region 14.7%. The 2019 DPIE population projections indicate that the population of Lane Cove is estimated to increase by 11,650 people between 2016 and 2041, from 37,700 to 49,350. This equates to a population increase of 31%, which contributes to a total increase of 50% since 2010, with no additional capacity provided to date for indoor sporting facilities.

 

Several demand studies and consultation activities have been undertaken over the last 14 years to inform the decision-making process for addressing the sport and recreation demands for the existing and growing population, including:-

 

1.   In 2008, The Lane Cove Council Recreation Action Plan found that there are no public indoor sports courts in the Lane Cove LGA. Supporting regional studies at that time and in the interim also showed that there is a supply / demand imbalance in Sydney's North for sports such as basketball and netball;

2.   In 2010, an independent report and operational review of the Lane Cove Country Club concluded that the current operating model of the golf clubhouse, golf course, tennis centre and golf course maintenance was unsustainable. Council subsequently determined to undertake a strategic review of the Country Club facility, other nearby community facilities, and the golf course to identify opportunities to provide a more viable sporting/cultural type development than what currently exists;

3.   In 2013/14, the “Indoor Sports Complex Feasibility Study - Lane Cove Country Club” identified the need for 20-36 additional courts in the lower north shore area (Montemare Consulting);

4.   Basketball NSW strategic plan and demand analysis identified a deficit of 22 indoor courts in 2016 and latent demand of at least 16%;

5.   In 2020, A Facility Supply Review (Xypher) was undertaken to determine the current supply of indoor sports courts and tennis court facilities in the catchment of the proposed Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct;

6.   “Business Case - Gore Hill Indoor Sports Centre” (Capital Insight, 2021) identified a shortage of up to 16 courts by 2036 in the sub-regional catchment of North Sydney;

7.   Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct - Feasibility and Operational Model (Xypher, 2021) undertook a peer review of existing demand information and identified if existing and planned additional courts at Gore Hill were provided, the area would have a supply of 35 courts, still 10 to 23 courts deficit of demand.

Council has focused on meeting this demand through a proposed Sport and Recreation Precinct on the existing car park and surrounds of the Lane Cove Golf Course. In April 2021 Council resolved:-

 

“That Council:-

 

1.   Receive and note the report;

2.   Submit a development application based on the finalised concept design as prepared by Allen Jack and Cottier; and

3.   The General Manager be granted delegated authority to enter into a fixed loan agreement for $20 million over 10 years with TCorp.”

 

A Development Application for the proposed Sport and Recreation Precinct facility was subsequently lodged on and is awaiting determination by the Sydney North Planning Panel.

 

Council at its Extraordinary Meeting of 24 January 2022 resolved:-

 

“That Council:-

 

1.    Request that the General Manager contacts the Sydney North Planning Panel and requests that they delay determination on DA 64/2021 for the indoor sport and recreation facility; noting that Council is not formally withdrawing the Development Application; and

 

2.    In the event that the Sydney North Planning Panel is unable or unwilling to delay determination on the Development Application, that Council confirms its commitment to consider other options for the indoor sport and recreation facility, and acknowledges that an approved Development Application will not prevent Council from further consulting with the community and considering all options.”

 

This request was subsequently conveyed to the Sydney North Planning Panel, Council is awaiting information as to the proposed scheduling of the matter.

 

Discussion

 

The proposed Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct will provide major sporting and recreational infrastructure project for the Northern Region of Sydney, Lower North Shore sub-region and for the Lane Cove community. The primary driver for the proposed precinct is to address the significant deficit in both indoor and outdoor sporting courts within the local and sub-regional area. Demand analysis, changing demographics / population growth and consultation with local and peak sporting bodies note the region generated demand for 45 to 68 indoor courts indicating a current deficit of 20+ courts.

 

The Lane Cove Local Government Area (LGA) is home to 694 basketball members (878 demand), 89% of whom play in the North Sydney LGA. Similarly, there are 915 netball members (1,243 demand) with 88% playing at the Willoughby Leisure Centre noting the Lane Cove – Greenwich catchment has the second highest number of members and demand on the Lower North Shore. Netball playing capacity is constrained to such an extent, that club play is now conducted on Friday night, Saturday and Sunday at the site. Furthermore, Saturday playing times have been reduced by 15 minutes per match to accommodate the demand. In each of these sports, undue pressure is borne by volunteers and the respective regional associations.

 

Engagement with local and peak sporting bodies aligned with the broader demand analysis and clearly identified the following:-

 

1.   Limited current multi-sport facilities within the sub-region to meet current demand:

2.   Increasing and future pressures on meeting demand based on population growth:

3.   High demand for additional sporting facilities with a specific reference in indoor multi-purpose sporting courts:

4.   There are limited opportunities for women to access appropriate sporting facilities within the catchment with specific reference to both netball and basketball:

5.   High desire from sporting bodies to increase (and meet latent demand) participation rates.

Included as AT-1 is a full business case for the project that has been prepared in line with NSW Treasury Guidelines. It should be noted that Council does not include a return on capital or debt servicing costs when evaluating the provision of community infrastructure. In addition to meeting the community’s needs, the Business Case demonstrates that no operational subsidy will be required for the facility.  The visitation forecast indicates Year 1 visits of 318,980 persons increasing to 363,094 persons in Year 10:-

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 5

Year 10

Indoor Sports Halls

267,712 

276,256 

284,800 

290,496 

304,736 

Outdoor Courts

42,695 

44,057 

45,420 

46,328 

48,599 

Program/Function Rms

8,573 

8,846 

9,120 

9,302 

9,758 

Total Visits

318,980 

329,160 

339,340 

346,127 

363,094 

 

The significant forecast visitation levels demonstrate the demand for the precinct and highlight the project's ability to meet and reduce the current identified facility gap within the local area and sub-region.

 

The financial forecast supports the ongoing operations with a surplus from Year 1 of $369,100 increasing to $691,600 in Year 10.

 

Item

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Year 10

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indoor Sports Halls

$529,200 

$557,000 

$585,800 

$603,500 

$621,800 

$720,500 

Outdoor Courts

$619,100 

$651,700 

$685,400 

$706,100 

$727,500 

$842,900 

Program/Function Rms

$161,600 

$170,100 

$178,900 

$184,300 

$189,900 

$220,000 

Café/ Bistro + Retail

$451,100 

$470,100 

$489,500 

$499,400 

$509,300 

$561,600 

Allied Heath (lease)

$120,300 

$121,500 

$122,800 

$124,000 

$125,200 

$131,600 

Total Revenue

$1,881,300 

$1,970,400 

$2,062,400 

$2,117,300 

$2,173,700 

$2,476,600 

Expenditure

 

 

 

 

 

 

Staff

$686,200 

$701,700 

$717,500 

$732,300 

$747,400 

$828,000 

Operating Costs

$603,200 

$620,400 

$637,900 

$648,000 

$658,400 

$712,200 

Energy

$50,600 

$51,300 

$51,900 

$52,500 

$53,100 

$56,400 

Marketing

$20,200 

$20,500 

$20,700 

$20,900 

$21,100 

$22,100 

Management Fee

$152,000 

$153,600 

$155,100 

$156,600 

$158,200 

$166,300 

Total Expenditure

$1,512,200 

$1,547,500 

$1,583,100 

$1,610,300 

$1,638,200 

$1,785,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating - surplus/(deficit)

$369,100 

$422,900 

$479,300 

$507,000 

$535,500 

$691,600 

 

To provide the opportunity for the community to understand the full business case for the facility, it is proposed to conduct a public forum, with the Business Case presented, and a Question and Answer session.

 

NSW Government Grant Opportunity

 

The NSW Government has committed $200 million to the Multi-Sport Community Facility Fund, recognising the critical role local sport infrastructure plays in keeping communities healthy, active and connected. Grants area available for between $1m and $5m, and applications close - 1pm, Friday 25 February 2022, with outcomes advised - May 2022 onwards and funding agreements executed for successful projects - within 3 months of notification of outcomes. Projects must commence in 2022 and be completed by 30 June 2025.

 

The primary objectives of the Fund are to:

 

·    Increase the number and type of multi-sport facilities

·    Improve the standard of existing multi-sport facilities

·    Increase the utilisation of sport facilities

·    Support the equitable provision of, and access to multi-sport facilities to grow sport participation for women and girls

·    Provide inclusive and accessible multi-sport facilities that support sport participation for people with disability, First Nations peoples and people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities.

 

Secondary objectives of the Fund are to:

 

·    Establish a diversified funding model

·    Improve operational sustainability

·    Promote and incorporate environmental sustainability and climate resiliency into design, construction and operation.

·    An increasing high socio-economic population of families with children and a large professional workforce within the Lane Cove, Willoughby and North Sydney LGAs is driving the need to respond with appropriate social infrastructure, including sport and recreation facilities. High socio-economic areas typically correlate with higher levels of physical activity and participation in sports, in part due to their ability to afford the related costs of participation (e.g. fees, registration, equipment, coaching).

 

The project and Council’s business case addresses all these objectives.

 

 

Due Diligence Update

 

As per Council’s April 2021 report, Council engaged Mitchell Brandt Quantity Surveyors to prepare a cost estimate for the project based on a conceptual design. Based on a high-grade facility, the construction of the 9 court facility was estimated to be in the range of $42-$48M.

 

Funding for the project is proposed to utilise a combination of s7.11 Developer Contributions, proceeds from the long-term lease of 266 Longueville Road, Grants and Loan Funds.

 

In regard to debt funding, Council has successfully secured a loan of $20M for 10 years with a 50% discount on the interest rate for the life of the loan. The actual rate will be dependent on the actual draw down date. Council has not drawn down the funds, and T-Corp have advised Council will need to reapply when it proposes to proceed with the loan. No issue is anticipated in obtaining a new loan approval. Repayments are proposed to be funded from the rental income from Council’s property investment portfolio.

 

In relation to s7.11 Developer Contributions, this has been delayed as the NSW Government has permanently deferred payment of s7.11 contributions until Occupation Certificate. Council’s s7.11 Developer Contributions Works Schedule provides for up to $20M to be utilised for the facility. Council’s current s7.11 Developer Contributions Reserve has approximately $7M and based on current development activity, sufficient funds will be received in order to contribute the full $20M to the project.

 

Alternate Site Options

 

Council has previously undertaken a review of locating the facility at Blackman Park as an alternative. Council staff examined the size of the facility and determined that it would not fit as the depth of the courts and surrounding circulation space prevents the facility being located over the existing carpark as was suggested. Blackman Park is already heavily utilised and is surrounded by a single lane residential street network, which limits its capacity to have further intensification of use. 

 

Separately Council has engaged Colliers Strategic Advisory (Property) to investigate 10 alternative sites for the Sport and Recreation Precinct in the Lane Cove West Business Park. At a high level, there are three sites that represent a potential opportunity for adaptation (re-purpose), the remainder would require demolition due to their built form configuration, which makes them unfeasible as they represent land value only.

 

In relation to the three sites that could be adapted, in each instance suitability is constrained by: costs for partial demolition and / or reconfiguration of the building; inferior amenity and indoor court capacity resulting in a high cost per court; limited floor to ceiling heights (clearance of 8.2m is required); parking capacity; current medium to long term leases; dislocation from Lane Cove village; and lack of regular public transport connections.

 

The three sites identified as “adaptable” range in acquisition cost from $27m to $33.5m, (note this pricing is indicative only and is based upon publicly available information, RP Index Data and Colliers internal data). They are capable of being adapted to deliver between 2 and 4 courts. Prices are for land acquisition including a demolition cost estimate, in other words the cost to deliver a vacant site only. Remediation, conversion, construction and any other associated costs are not included.

 

Colliers’ research indicates that of the 10 sites only two of the nominated sites were of a scale that could accommodate the Sport and Recreation Precinct as envisaged by Council. In each instance any purchase would necessitate the need to subdivide the total holding which is problematic. Additionally, each of these sites would cost circa $90m to purchase.

 

In Colliers opinion, Lane Cove West is not the optimal site for the proposed Sports and Recreation precinct. Given the commercial nature of this matter, the Colliers’ report has been circulated separately to Councillors on a confidential basis.

 

Conclusion

 

The Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct represents a significant investment in public social

infrastructure. The Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct serves as a valuable vehicle for

advancing both the NSW State and the Commonwealth Government’s agenda to improve

community health and wellbeing through improved participation in sports and recreation activities

as well as access to education and health facilities.

 

Council has an ideal opportunity to secure partial funding for the Sport and Recreation

Precinct based on the following “Primary” objectives per the Multi-Sport Community Facility Fund

Guidleines:

 

·    Increase the number and type of multi-sport facilities;

·    Improve the standard of existing multi-sport facilities

·    Increase the utilisation of sport facilities

·    Support the equitable provision of, and access to multi-sport facilities to grow sport participation for women and girls

·    Provide inclusive and accessible multi-sport facilities that support sport participation for people with disability, First Nations peoples and people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities.

It is recommended that Council make an application for grant funding under NSW Government Multi-Sport Community Facility Fund and conduct a public forum, with the Business Case presented, and a Question and Answer session.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:-

1.   Receive and note the report;

2.   Make application for grant funding under NSW Government Multi-Sport Community Facility Fund; and

3.   Conduct a public forum, with the Business Case presented, and a Question and Answer session.

 

 

Craig Wrightson

General Manager

General Managers Unit

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct - Business Case - 21 February 2022

49 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

Lane Cove Sport and Recreation Precinct - Business Case - 21 February 2022

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator


PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

North Sydney Council request to advocate for changes to the St Leonards Crows Nest 2036 Plan

 

 

Subject:          North Sydney Council request to advocate for changes to the St Leonards Crows Nest 2036 Plan    

Record No:    SU6005 - 7416/22

Division:         Environmental Services Division

Author(s):      Mark Brisby; Craig Wrightson 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The St Leonards/ Crows Nest 2036 Plan that was finalised in August 2020. On 24 January 2022, North Sydney Council considered a Notice of Motion regarding the 2036 Plan which raised concern over the extent and nature of changes that were made to the Plan following its exhibition in October 2018 that were not the subject of community consultation.

North Sydney Council is seeking Council to join them in a joint delegation to the Minister to review the plan. The report is submitted for Council’s consideration.

Background

 

North Sydney Council considered a Notice of Motion regarding the 2036 Plan at its meeting of 24 January 2022, resolved the following:-

That:-

1.   Council reiterate its strong opposition to the significant increases to the exhibited maximum heights on at least 29 sites, and particularly to the maximum heights along the western side of the Pacific Highway, under the 2036 Plan.

2.   Council condemns the significant adverse amenity impacts of the increased heights along the western side of the Pacific Highway on residents and properties of St Leonards, Crows Nest and the eastern slopes of Wollstonecraft.

3.   Council seek immediate amendments to the final adopted 2036 Plan to return the maximum heights, which were increased following community consultation and exhibition of the Draft 2036 Plan, to the exhibited heights.

4.   Council note that there are currently at least two Planning Proposals submitted to Council that seek heights in excess of the exhibited heights under the Draft 2036 Plan

5.   Council write to Lane Cove and Willoughby Councils seeking support for a joint delegation to the Minister for Planning in relation to the maximum heights under the 2036 Plan and the operation of the State Infrastructure Contributions within the 2036 Plan boundaries.

6.   Council provide a copy of this resolution to the immediately impacted Precincts including Wollstonecraft, Holtermann and Hayberry Precincts and to the Combined Precincts Committee.

North Sydney advise that “since its finalisation, their Council planning staff have been dealing with the errors, inadequate controls and design issues within the plan. These issues continue to create difficulties in the plan's implementation and represent a major impost on Council resources. Further, the post exhibition increases to the maximum heights on at least 29 sites in the plan, has noticeably damaged community trust in the planning system.

If nothing is done, there is concern that the Pacific Highway will be defined by a 'wall of towers' that create significant adverse amenity impacts on both the existing and future populations of Wollstonecraft, Crows Nest and St Leonards.

Accordingly, Lane Cove Council and North Sydney Council seek your support for a joint delegation to the Minister for Planning to request:

1.   immediate amendments to the 2036 Plan to remove the post exhibition changes to the maximum building heights and floor space ratios that were not subject to public comment; and

2.   a greater level of transparency and input into the operation of the Special Infrastructure Contribution to ensure population  growth  is  supported  by  adequate  public  open  space, transport upgrades and social infrastructure.”

Discussion

 

The St Leonards/ Crows Nest 2036 Plan prior to finalisation had adjustments made to building heights in the Lane Cove LGA, predominantly relating to the ‘significant sites’ which were identified in the draft plan but contained no height or FSR controls. The map below shows the height controls, those surrounded by --- line are sites which had their controls changed.

 

 

To date Council has seen rezoning / Development Applications for sites on the western side of Nicholson Street, but no actual applications for sites along the Pacific Highway. Overall the height controls proposed along the Highway are in context to the surrounding site controls, however any Planning Proposals for these sites will require detailed analysis in terms of their impacts on adjoining lower scale developments and view corridors. Council has not undertaken any strategic analysis at this stage to determine whether the controls are ultimately suitable.

 

Conclusion

 

Should Council wish to join North Sydney in a delegation to the Minister, the appropriate resolution would be as follows:-

 

1.    The report be received and noted; and

2.    Council advise North Sydney that it is willing to join them in a delegation to the Hon Anthony Roberts MP, Minister for Planning and Minister for Homes, to seek:-

a.   Immediate amendments to the 2036 Plan to remove the post exhibition changes to the maximum building heights and floor space ratios that were not subject to public comment; and

b.   A greater level of transparency and input into the operation of the Special Infrastructure Contribution to ensure population growth is supported by adequate public open space, transport upgrades and social infrastructure.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council determine the matter.

 

Mark Brisby

Executive Manager

Environmental Services Division

 

Craig Wrightson

General Manager

General Managers Unit

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Councillor Training Attendance Request - Local Government NSW Executive Certificate for Elected Members

 

 

Subject:          Councillor Training Attendance Request - Local Government NSW Executive Certificate for Elected Members    

Record No:    SU2520 - 7257/22

Division:         Corporate Services Division

Author(s):      Emma McLennan 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Local Government NSW distributed correspondence via email on Wednesday, 9 February 2022 announcing that registrations for the Executive Certificate for Elected Members training program were now open. Councillor Kennedy, Councillor Bryla and Councillor Roenfeldt subsequently expressed an interest in participating in this training program.

 

This report seeks Council’s endorsement for Councillor Kennedy, Councillor Bryla and Councillor Roenfeldt to undertake the Local Government NSW Executive Certificate for Elected Members training program.

 

Discussion

 

The Executive Certificate for Elected Members training program is developed by Local Government NSW in partnership with University of Technology Sydney. The program is the first accredited course in NSW, developed specifically for elected representatives, and is designed for councillors looking for tools to navigate local government. The course content consists of councillor roles and responsibilities, integrated planning and reporting, community engagement and land-use planning, and communication and capabilities.

 

The course is delivered online for the duration of 4 days (32 hours) in total. The course dates are Friday, 11 March and Saturday, 12 March 2022 (Block 1) and Friday, 08 April and Saturday, 09 April 2022 (Block 2). The cost of the training program is $3,500 per person.

 

Council’s Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy allows councillors to attend conferences, training and development and similar functions by Council resolution or where it is not practical to submit a report to Council prior to the event such requests can be approved by the Mayor and General Manager. 

 

The Councillor Training Expenses Budget currently contains sufficient funds of $21,880 to accommodate the training request of Councillor Kennedy, Councillor Bryla and Councillor Roenfeldt. Any additional Councillors that wish to attend the training, can nominate at the Council Meeting.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council endorse the request by Councillor Kennedy, Councillor Bryla and Councillor Roenfeldt to undertake the Local Government NSW Executive Certificate for Elected Members training course at a cost of $3,500 per person.

 

Steven Kludass

Executive Manager - Corporate Services

Corporate Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Second Quarter Review of the 2021/22 Delivery Program and Operational Plan

 

 

Subject:          Second Quarter Review of the 2021/22 Delivery Program and Operational Plan    

Record No:    SU238 - 1866/22

Division:         Corporate Services Division

Author(s):      Stephen Golding 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

This report outlines the Second Quarter of 2021/22 progress towards achieving the projects listed in the adopted 2021/22 Delivery Program and Operational Plan. It is recommended that the report be received and noted.

 

Background

 

Council’s 2021/22 Delivery Program and Operational Plan details the projects proposed to be undertaken during the financial year and the performance measures required to meet the goals and objectives of the Community Strategic Plan: Liveable Lane Cove: 2035

 

Discussion

 

The Second Quarter Review of the 2021/22 Delivery Program and Operational Plan is attached at AT-1

 

A number of planned community events were held during this quarter including;

 

·    Free signature music event at The Canopy featuring Kate Ceberano; and

·    Christmas in Lane Cove including 12 days of Plaza pop-ups and Bluey’s Christmas in Lane Cove performance

 

Other highlights included;

 

·    Council partnered with the NSW Electoral Commission to successfully conduct the 2021 Local Government Elections, with the declaration of results announced on 20 December 2021.

·    Council commenced construction of the Over Rail Green Space at St Leonards.

·    Lane Cove Mayors: A retrospective 1895-2021 was made available as an eBook via the Library catalogue and on the Shorelink Digital Library.

·    The Council Facebook online announcement of the winners of Lane Cove Literary Awards 2021 has been viewed more than 1,000 times.

·    The HSC Study Program included an online workshop, Thriving During the HSC and two HSC Study nights.

·    Turrumburra Storytelling installation in Lane Cove Plaza during Festival by the River

·    Mental Health month promotions including Mental Health is Everyone’s Business Breakfast in partnership with Black Dog Institute

·    Installation of second village public art mural on Birdwood Lane

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Second Quarter Review of the 2021/22 Delivery Program and Operational Plan be received and noted.

 

Steven Kludass

Executive Manager - Corporate Services

Corporate Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

2nd Quarter Delivery Program and Operational Plan - Quarterly Review - 2021 -2022

167 Pages

Available Electronically

  


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Advocacy letter to DPIE re BASIX higher standards

 

 

Subject:          Advocacy letter to DPIE re BASIX higher standards    

Record No:    SU8469 - 5777/22

Division:         Environmental Services Division

Author(s):      Ada Wong 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Proposed increases to Building Sustainability Index (‘BASIX‘) requirements were released by the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) for public consultation (‘Higher Standards‘) in November 2021 and on exhibition until 28 February 2022.

 

Council’s draft submission to DPIE re BASIX higher standards lists a number of concerns and recommendations to further improve the standards. This is to ensure the homes we build today are designed to meet Council’s emissions reduction and water targets, thermally comfortable, safe to live in, and inexpensive to cool. It is recommended Council endorse the draft submission attached as (AT-1).

 

Background

 

BASIX is a scheme created by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 and State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 which aims to improve the environmental sustainability of residential developments in NSW. It requires certain development applications to be accompanied by a list of environmental sustainability commitments in a certificate issued by the Planning Secretary.

 

The proposed higher standards by DPIE are currently on exhibition (until 28 February 2022) aims to build more comfortable homes, cut energy costs and contribute to the NSW Government target of net zero emissions by 2050.

 

In March 2020, Council endorsed ambitious environmental targets; an 80% reduction of emissions by 2036 and no net water use increase (based on 2016/17 levels). This is more ambitious than the NSW Government target and requires stronger and faster actions. The current proposed higher standards do not fully support Council’s ambitious environmental targets.

 

Discussion

 

After review of the proposed BASIX standards, there are a number of concerns regarding the higher BASIX standards in the draft submission (AT-1). The submission advocates for the DPIE to further improve the standards for residential developments by making the following recommendations.

 

1.   Use future climate files (2070) for thermal modelling in NatHERS, which forms part of the BASIX Thermal Comfort standards

Council recommends BASIX to use the best available climate data to ensure all new developments are future ready for climate projections in terms of appropriateness and safety of building and site design for the year 2070. Waverley Council has recently completed the project “future proofing residential development for climate change”[1]. Considering this, Council supports BASIX to require the use of the same future climate files (2070) for thermal modelling in NatHERS. This would form part of the BASIX Thermal Comfort standards.

 

We support the NSW Government in updating the emission factor of grid electricity to account for potential change in emissions from grid electricity and acknowledging new developments built now will continue to operate for next 60 years. In line with the application of projected greenhouse emissions, NSW Government should consider using projected climate files to form part of BASIX thermal comfort standards.

 

2.   Unify thermal comfort and energy standards for different dwelling types

In the proposed standards, multi-dwelling developments are not required to have the same thermal comfort as a detached / semi-detached dwelling despite their natural thermal comfort advantage. High-rise apartments also have a different level of thermal comfort standard than low-rise apartments.

 

Council recommends all dwelling typologies be equally energy efficient and to provide the same thermal comfort standards to ensure adequate, safe and affordable housing standards for all, irrespective of which type of dwelling they live in.

 

3.   New developments to be transitioned away from gas to meet the net zero targets

Council recommends that the NSW Government should provide a clear pathway for transitioning away from gas for new homes to meet its net zero by 2050 target, as new houses and apartments built now will continue to operate for next 60 years.

Council recommends accelerated requirements for greenfield developments and major refurbishments to move away from gas. As a minimum, gas should not be available for multi-unit developments from 2022.

 

4.   Set minimum standard for lighting and stop promotion of sub performing appliances

Council recommends setting minimum technical performance standards to eliminate poor lighting choices, e.g. LED lighting only. Allowing fluorescent lights, which are more expensive to run and create a problem waste, should be discouraged. For multi-unit developments, LED light fittings plus high-efficiency controls should be required.

Council recommends removing energy inefficient lights and appliances as an option for compliance, e.g. “Reverse cycle air-conditioner (2 stars heating, 1-star cooling)” as a compliance pathway in document “Design and Place SEPP - Sustainability in Residential Building”. Highly energy efficient air conditioners should be encouraged to reduce ongoing running costs.

 

5.   Allow Council to increase minimum standard performance

Council recommends the NSW Government allow individual councils to increase minimum standard performance for energy and water use for residential buildings, other than by way of providing incentive provisions.

 

Options for incentivising high- performance buildings through 'bonus' provisions have been previously investigated to achieve our ambitious environmental targets however this has proved problematic to implement. A more pragmatic and effective pathway would be to review the current BASIX targets across the LGA to require that new residential developments contribute to improved environmental performance in line with our emission targets, whilst reducing running costs for occupants.

If this option is not supported, our preference would be to identify low-carbon high performance precincts. The North District Plan and Council’s Local Strategic Planning Statement currently identifies St Leonards as a low carbon precinct. These precincts would require increased BASIX energy targets in high-rise (6 storey units or higher) and mid-rise (4-5 storey units) residential buildings.

 

6.   Include other health benefits and cost to biodiversity in the CBA

Council recommends including the followings in the CBA:-

·    Health benefits of community of people living comfortably, safely, sleep properly, ability to be productive as climate warms, or costs to community of increased heat affected unwellness, lack of productivity, heat stroke/death

·    cost to biodiversity of inaction in reducing carbon emissions to net zero targets to all planetary species

Including these costs will provide a business case to further increase stringency in thermal comfort, energy efficiency, water efficiency and embodied emissions reductions. The cost of inaction to meet net zero targets should also be included in any CBA analysis.

 

7.   Training for development assessment officers

Council recommends that the NSW Government to provide training for Council development assessment officers to understand the new Merit Assessment pathway and how it affects future assessments.

 

8.   Increase water efficiency standard as soon as possible

Council recommends that the NSW Government reviews and considers increased water efficiency standards as soon as possible in line with the implementation of BASIX higher standards as water efficiency standards is an integral part of BASIX.

 

Conclusion

 

The BASIX SEPP is acknowledged as a robust tool to drive the uptake of sustainable building materials and practices that result in the reduction of greenhouse gases, reducing long-term energy running costs and improve health and wellbeing for occupants. It is one of the most effective ways to meet Council emissions reduction and water targets, and build climate resilience in our community.

 

Council is urged to adopt the draft submission to DPIE re BASIX higher standards to further improve sustainability standards for residential developments.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council:-

 

1.   Receive and note the report; and

2.   Adopt the draft submission to DPIE re BASIX higher standards included as AT-1.

 

Mark Brisby

Executive Manager

Environmental Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

DRAFT Submission to DPIE re BASIX high standards - Lane Cove Council submission

4 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

DRAFT Submission to DPIE re BASIX high standards - Lane Cove Council submission

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Council support for NSW Plastics Action Plan

 

 

Subject:          Council support for NSW Plastics Action Plan    

Record No:    SU8201 - 6010/22

Division:         Environmental Services Division

Author(s):      Fiona McCleary 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The NSW Plastics Action Plan was launched in June 2021 to manage plastic throughout its lifecycle, from generation through to production, supply and waste.

 

The key outcomes of the NSW Plastics Action Plan are to reduce plastic waste, increase the efficiency of plastic resources, reduce the amount of plastics that are not kept in a circular loop or properly managed at their end-of-life (plastic leakage) and prepare for the future of plastics.

 

These outcomes will be achieved through the phase out of certain single-use and unnecessary plastic products, accelerating the transition to more sustainable and less harmful plastic products by funding innovation and research, and better managing the leakage of problem plastic litter.

 

Council can support local businesses to transition from single use plastics to more sustainable options.

 

Background

 

Through the NSW Plastics Action Plan, the NSW Government will begin to phase out a range of plastic packaging products and expanded polystyrene from the 1st June 2022 to reach its target for all packaging to be either reusable, recyclable or compostable by 2025.

 

There are three stages to phasing out the problem plastics. Items were selected for phase out due to their impact on the environment and the availability of sustainable alternatives. Lightweight shopping bags will be phased out from 1st June 2022. Plastic straws, stirrers, cutlery, polystyrene food service items, cotton buds with plastic sticks, microbeads in rinse-off personal care and cosmetic products will be phased out from November 2022. In three years a review will be conducted on plastic bowls (including lids) and plates, plastic cups (including lids), oxo-degradable plastics, fruit stickers (non compostable), heavyweight plastic shopping bags and barrier/produce bags to determine if sustainable alternatives are available for these items.

 

Discussion

 

Plastic packaging and single-use plastic items make up 60% of all litter in NSW and pose a threat

to wildlife and our environment. Approximately 575 million plastic items were littered in NSW in

2018–19. With only 8% of all plastic consumed in NSW (in 2019-20) recovered for reuse, there is

considerable scope for improvement

 

Over the years Council has responded to growing community concern over single-use plastics. In 2018 Council phased out single use plastic items at all Council venues and Council supported and sponsored events.

 

Council has supported local businesses find practical ways to minimise plastic. In 2018 Council developed a plastic straw reduction program to assist local businesses in reducing the use of single use plastic straws. Sustainable alternatives were provided to food outlets and accompanied with an awareness and education campaign to encourage food outlets to phase out single use plastic straws. As a result of the trial, 46% of businesses ceased using single-use plastic straws.

 

In 2019 Council implemented a single-use plastic bag reduction program to help businesses transition from unsustainable, disposable, single-use bags to reusable and durable alternatives. The program was implemented in partnership with Macquarie University’s Student Consultancy Program. Four hundred (400) bags were provided to twenty-four (24) food outlets and accompanied with an awareness and education campaign. As a result of the program, 33% of businesses committed to ceased using single-use plastic bags. Many more businesses have now made the switch to more eco-friendly solutions.

 

Whilst we recognize that businesses bear the responsibility for purchasing sustainable items, shifting consumer behavior and expectations is also important. To this end, Council has been supporting the phase out of single use plastic bags through the provision of shopping trolleys for customers who purchased Lane Cove Gift Cards.

 

Council will continue to support local businesses as they transition away from single use plastics by promoting both the NSW Plastics Action Plan and sustainable and viable product alternatives. Our communications campaign will initially focus on food and retail outlets to ensure they are informed and prepared for the changes. Following this we will focus on the remaining businesses throughout the LGA.

 

Conclusion

 

Council welcomes the introduction of the NSW Plastics Action Plan. Removing unnecessary single use plastic items from local businesses is in line with community expectations.

 

Council will support businesses as they transition away from single use plastic items through regular targeted communications to promote the NSW Plastics Action Plan and showcase sustainable alternatives.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

 

Mark Brisby

Executive Manager

Environmental Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Second Quarterly Budget Review - 2021/22 Budget

 

 

Subject:          Second Quarterly Budget Review - 2021/22 Budget    

Record No:    SU8604 - 2858/22

Division:         Corporate Services Division

Author(s):      Sarah Seaman 

 

 

Executive Summary

                                                              

The 2021/22 Budget - Second Quarter Review involves a number of variations to both income and expenditure estimates. Taking into consideration the variations from the Second Quarter Budget Review, the projected 2021/22 overall operating result has been revised to a surplus of $5.9M, with the operating result before grants and capital contributions forecast to be a deficit of $0.94M. The deficit is primarily due to the financial impacts arising from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the effect they continue to have on Council’s Budget. It is recommended that the Budget be varied in accordance with this report.

 

Background

 

Council is required to prepare a Budget Review Statement each quarter, in accordance with Clause 203 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005. The purpose of these reviews is to ensure that the impacts of financial variations are reflected in the forecast of Council’s global budgetary position to 30 June 2022, and the adopted Budget adjusted accordingly.

 

The financial impacts of COVID-19 continue to have an adverse impact on Council’s Budget. The financial impact for the second quarter is estimated to be $0.4M (this is in addition to the $0.6M reported in the First Quarter Budget Review) and is primarily attributed to reduced income derived from leases and parking. This brings the total estimated cost of COVID-19 to $1M for the 2021/22 financial year.

 

Discussion

A summary of Council’s revised Budget for 2021/22 and a summary of budget movements have been included in this report:

 

 

Original Budget

(000’s)

1st Quarter Adjustments

(000’s)

2nd Quarter Adjustments

(000’s)

Revised

Budget

(000’s)

Expenditure - Operating

$53,045

$785

$294

$54,124

Income - Operating

$53,185

$74

($78)

$53,181

Surplus/(Deficit) before

Capital Grants & Contributions

$140

($711)

($372)

($943)

Income - Capital

$5,798

$1,138

$0

$6,936

Surplus/ (Deficit)

$5,938

$427

($372)

$5,993

 

Summary of Budget Movements

 

Operational Income:

 

-     $78K Increase in Grant, Other Revenue and Other Income which is made up of:

 

-      $50K Increase – Expected lease income from carpark lease, 56-60 Burns Bay Road

-      $27K Increase – Contributions received from Sydney Water for Restoration works at Warraroon Reserve

-      $75K Increase – Grant received for Lane Cove Walk Wayfinding

-      $170K Increase – Additional Bus Shelter income

-      $400K decrease – Additional income loss from COVID for 21/22

 

Operational Expenses:

 

-     $294K Increase in Materials and Contracts and Other Expenses which is made up of:

 

-      $15K Increase – Carpark maintenance to meet lease agreement 56-60 Burns Bay Road

-      $27K Increase – Restoration works at Warraroon Reserve (funded by Sydney Water)

-      $75K Increase – Lane Cove Walk Wayfinding (Grant funded)

-      $22K Increase – Additional Strata Levies for Meeting House Community Hall

-      $35K Increase – Additional expenses related to COVID

-      $20K Increase – Additional Legal Costs for Environmental Health matters

-      $100K Increase – SES shared facilities costs

 

Capital Income

 

-     $800K Increase in Transfer from Reserves which is made up of:

 

-      $40K Increase – Additional Vehicle (funded from the Fleet Reserve)

-      $20K Increase – Accounts Payable Automation Software (funded from the Office Equipment Reserve)

-      $40K Increase – LED Lighting for Tantallon Oval (funded from the Sustainability Levy)

-      $700K Increase – Footpath works relating to installation of new Bus Shelters (funded from Capital Works Reserve)

 

Capital Expenditure

 

-     $970K Increase Capital Expenditure which is made up of:

 

-      $40K Increase – Additional Vehicle (funded from the Fleet Reserve)

-      $20K Increase – Accounts Payable Automation Software (funded from the Office Equipment Reserve)

-      $40K Increase – LED Lighting for Tantallon Oval (funded from the Sustainability Levy)

-      $870K Increase – Footpath works relating to installation of new Bus Shelters

 

A copy of all proposed budget adjustments can be found in AT-1.

 

Conclusion

The following statement, by the Responsible Accounting Officer, is made in accordance with Clause 203(2) of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005.

It is my opinion that the Quarterly Budget Review Statement for Lane Cove Council for the quarter ended 31 December 2021 indicates that Council's projected financial position will be satisfactory at year end 30 June 2022, having regard to the projected estimates of income and expenditure and the original budgeted income and expenditure.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the 2021/22 Budget be revised in accordance with the adjustments identified in the second quarter, as follows:-

 

 

Original Budget

(000’s)

1st Quarter Adjustments

(000’s)

2nd Quarter Adjustments

(000’s)

Revised

Budget

(000’s)

Expenditure - Operating

$53,045

$785

$294

$54,124

Income - Operating

$53,185

$74

($78)

$53,181

Surplus/(Deficit) before

Capital Grants &      Contributions

$140

($711)

($372)

($943)

Income - Capital

$5,798

$1,138

$0

$6,936

Surplus/ (Deficit)

$5,938

$427

($372)

$5,993

 

Steven Kludass

Executive Manager - Corporate Services

Corporate Services Division

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Budget Review for the Quarter ended 31 December 2021

11 Pages

 

 

 


ATTACHMENT 1

Budget Review for the Quarter ended 31 December 2021

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022

 

 

Subject:          Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022    

Record No:    SU837 - 79777/21

Division:         Corporate Services Division

Author(s):      Stephen Golding 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The NSW Office of Local Government released a new Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW on the 29 October 2021, (NSW OLG Circular 21-35) made under section 360 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (the Regulation).

 

The Model Code of Meeting Practice comprises mandatory and non-mandatory provisions.

 

Councils must adopt a code of meeting practice that incorporates the mandatory provisions of the Model Code of Meeting Practice no later than 12 months after each ordinary council elections.

This report recommends that the Draft Code of Meeting Practice which has been developed with regards to the new Model Code and related Council policies and procedures, be adopted for community consultation and that a further report addressing any submissions received and any proposed amendments to the draft Code, be received by Council following the consultation period.

 

Background

 

The current Code of Meeting Practice was adopted by Council at the Ordinary Council Meeting of 20 May 2019 and was based on the Model Code of Meeting Practice issued by the Office of Local Government and prescribed by the Local Government (General) Regulation on 14 December 2018. Minor amendments were adopted by Council at the Ordinary Council Meeting of 18 May 2020.

 

The new Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW, was published in the Gazette on 29 October 2021, and prescribed for the purposes of the Act, section 360(1).

 

The repeal date for section 237 of the Regulation that exempts councils from the requirement (under clause 5.2 of the previous iteration of the Model Meeting Code) for councillors to be personally present at meetings in order to participate in the meetings was extended to 30 June 2022.

 

This extension has provided NSW Councils additional time to exhibit and adopt a new Code of Meeting Practice that contains provisions for allowing attendance by audio-visual link at meetings.

 

If council does not adopt a new meeting code that allows councillors to attend meetings by audio-visual link, council will not be permitted to do so after 30 June 2022.

 

Council has reviewed the new Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW with regards to Council’s current Mode of Meeting Practice, policies and procedures and developed the Draft Code of Meeting Practice (2022) (AT-1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

 

A review of the new Model Code of Meeting Practice has been undertaken against Council’ current Code of Meeting Practice (adopted 18 May 2020).

 

The new changes made by the NSW OLG’s New Model Meeting Code (29 October 2021) for inclusion in Council’s Code are shown in red-scarlet font and/or with strikethrough within the Draft Code of Meeting Practice (2022) (AT-1). These are the mandatory provisions. Where there are non-mandatory provisions, they are indicated as non-mandatory.

 

The mandatory provisions include minor changes such as, but not limited to, regulation dates, minor wording changes and clause numbering to address new additional and or redundant clauses. 

 

The key mandatory changes are:

 

·    3.26, page 9, Statement of Ethical Obligations [corresponding to 3.23 in new Model Meeting Code]. This amendment is reflective of the ICAC recommendations that the Model Meeting Code be amended to require that council business papers include a reminder to councillors of their oath or affirmation of office, and their conflict of interest disclosure obligations, as a result of an ICAC investigation report of the former Canterbury City Council (Operation Dasha).

·    5.2, page 14, additional wording being ‘unless permitted to attend the meeting by audio-visual link under this code’. [New in Model Meeting Code]

Amendments have also been made to the provisions governing the webcasting of meetings, pages 19 and 20, clauses 5.34 to 5.40, and disorder at meetings (at page 44 and page 46), to reflect amendments to the Regulation since the previous iteration of the Model Meeting Code was prescribed.

 

Non-mandatory provisions cover areas of meeting practice that are common to most councils but where there may be a need for some variation in practice between councils based on local circumstances. The non-mandatory provisions also operate to set a benchmark based on what OLG sees as best practice for the relevant area of practice.

 

The key non-mandatory changes primarily relate to meetings held by audio/visual link and are summarised as follows:

 

·    3.38, page 11, Pre-meeting briefing sessions may be held by audio-visual link. [Corresponding to 3.35 in new Model Meeting Code]

·    4.2, page 12, Public forums may be held by audio-visual link. [New in Model Meeting Code]

·    8.1, page 25, Order of Business for Ordinary Council Meetings, clause 8.1, item 2:  Apologies has additional wording as follows, and applications for a leave of absence or attendance by audio-visual link by councillors [new in Model Meeting Code].

·    14.21, page 40, Councillors attending a meeting by audio-visual link must ensure that no other person is within sight or hearing of the meeting at any time that the meeting is closed to the public under section 10A of the Act.            [Corresponds to 14.20 in new Model Meeting Code]

·    16.2, page 47, Councillors attending a meeting by audio-visual link must declare and manage any conflicts of interest they may have in matters being considered at the meeting in accordance with the council’s code of conduct. Where a councillor has declared a pecuniary or significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in a matter being discussed at the meeting, the councillor’s audio-visual link to the meeting must be suspended or terminated and the councillor must not be in sight or hearing of the meeting at any time during which the matter is being considered or discussed by the council or committee, or at any time during which the council or committee is voting on the matter. [New in Model Meeting Code]

·    19.2, page 52, additional item (a) the names of councillors attending a council meeting and whether they attended the meeting in person or by audio-visual link, [new in Model Meeting Code]

·    20.23, page 56, additional item (a) the names of councillors attending a meeting and whether they attended the meeting in person or by audio-visual link, [new in Model Meeting Code]

 

Meetings Held by Audio-Visual Link related clauses are new to the Model Meeting code that are non-mandatory provisions. These are found on page 16 of the Draft Code of Meeting Practice (2021) (AT-1) and are listed below;

 

·    5.15     A meeting of the council or a committee of the council may be held by audio-visual link where the mayor determines that the meeting should be held by audio-visual link because of a natural disaster or a public health emergency. The mayor may only make a determination under this clause where they are satisfied that attendance at the meeting may put the health and safety of councillors and staff at risk. The mayor must make a determination under this clause in consultation with the general manager and, as far as is practicable, with each councillor. [Corresponds to 5.16 in new Model Meeting Code]

·    5.16     Where the Mayor determines under clause 5.16 that a meeting is to be held by audio-visual link, the General Manager must:

a)   give written notice to all councillors that the meeting is to be held by audio-visual link, and

b)   take all reasonable steps to ensure that all councillors can participate in the meeting by audio-visual link, and

c)   cause a notice to be published on the council’s website and in such other manner the general manager is satisfied will bring it to the attention of as many people as possible, advising that the meeting is to be held by audio-visual link and providing information about where members of the public may view the meeting. [Corresponds to 5.17 in new Model Meeting Code]

·    5.17     This code applies to a meeting held by audio-visual link under clause 5.16 in the same way it would if the meeting was held in person.

Note: Where a council holds a meeting by audio-visual link under clause 5.15, it is still required under section 10 of the Act to provide a physical venue for members of the public to attend in person and observe the meeting. [Corresponds to 5.18 in new Model Meeting Code]

Attendance by Councillors at Meetings by Audio-Visual Link related clauses are new to the Model Meeting code and are non-mandatory provisions. These are found on page 16 to page 18 inclusive of the Draft Code of Meeting Practice (2022) (AT-1) and are listed below;

 

·    5.18     Councillors may attend and participate in meetings of the council and committees of the council by audio-visual link with the approval of the council or the relevant committee. [Corresponds to 5.19 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.19     A request by a councillor for approval to attend a meeting by audio-visual link must be made in writing to the General Manager prior to the meeting in question and must provide reasons why the councillor will be prevented from attending the meeting in person. [Corresponds to 5.20 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.20     Councillors may request approval to attend more than one meeting by audio-visual link. Where a councillor requests approval to attend more than one meeting by audio-visual link, the request must specify the meetings the request relates to in addition to the information required under clause 5.19. [Corresponds to 5.21 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.21     The council must comply with the Health Privacy Principles prescribed under the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 when collecting, holding, using and disclosing health information in connection with a request by a councillor to attend a meeting by audio-visual link. [Corresponds to 5.22 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.22     A councillor who has requested approval to attend a meeting of the council or a committee of the council by audio-visual link may participate in the meeting by audio-visual link until the council or committee determines whether to approve their request and is to be taken as present at the meeting. The councillor may participate in a decision in relation to their request to attend the meeting by audio-visual link. [Corresponds to 5.23 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.23     A decision whether to approve a request by a councillor to attend a meeting of the council or a committee of the council by audio-visual link must be made by a resolution of the council or the committee concerned. The resolution must state:

the meetings the resolution applies to, and

the reason why the councillor is being permitted to attend the meetings by audio-visual link where it is on grounds other than illness, disability, or caring responsibilities. [Corresponds to 5.24 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.24     If the council or committee refuses a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link, their link to the meeting is to be terminated. [Corresponds to 5.25 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.25     A decision whether to approve a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link is at the council’s or the relevant committee’s discretion. The council and committees of the council must act reasonably when considering requests by councillors to attend meetings by audio-visual link. However, the council and committees of the council are under no obligation to approve a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link where the technical capacity does not exist to allow the councillor to attend the meeting by these means. [Corresponds to 5.26 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.26     The council and committees of the council may refuse a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link where the council or committee is satisfied that the councillor has failed to appropriately declare and manage conflicts of interest, observe confidentiality or to comply with this code on one or more previous occasions they have attended a meeting of the council or a committee of the council by audio-visual link. [Corresponds to 5.27 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.27     This code applies to a councillor attending a meeting by audio-visual link in the same way it would if the councillor was attending the meeting in person. Where a councillor is permitted to attend a meeting by audio-visual link under this code, they are to be taken as attending the meeting in person for the purposes of the code and will have the same voting rights as if they were attending the meeting in person. [Corresponds to 5.28 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.28     A councillor must give their full attention to the business and proceedings of the meeting when attending a meeting by audio-visual link. The councillor’s camera must be on at all times during the meeting except as may be otherwise provided for under this code. [Corresponds to 5.29 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    5.29     A councillor must be appropriately dressed when attending a meeting by audio-visual link and must ensure that no items are within sight of the meeting that are inconsistent with the maintenance of order at the meeting or that are likely to bring the council or the committee into disrepute. [Corresponds to 5.30 in new Model Meeting Code]

·    5.45, page 21, The general manager and other council staff may attend meetings of the council and committees of the council by audio-visual-link. Attendance by council staff at meetings by audio-visual link (other than as members of the public) shall be with the approval of the general manager. [Corresponds to 5.44 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

How Disorder by Councillors Attending Meetings by Audio-Visual Link may be Dealt With is new in Model Meeting Code and is a non-mandatory provision. These clauses are on are page 45 of the Draft Code of Meeting Practice (2021) (AT-1) and are as follows;

 

·    15.20   Where a councillor is attending a meeting by audio-visual link, the chairperson or a person authorised by the chairperson may mute the councillor’s audio link to the meeting for the purposes of enforcing compliance with this code. [Corresponds to 15.21 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

·    15.21   If a councillor attending a meeting by audio-visual link is expelled from a meeting for an act of disorder, the chairperson of the meeting or a person authorised by the chairperson, may terminate the councillor’s audio-visual link to the meeting. [Corresponds to 15.22 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

Other Proposed Amendments to the Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022

 

In addition to the OLG’s mandatory and non-mandatory provisions, a number of other proposed amendments to the Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022 are offered for Council consideration.

 

·    Section 8.1 of the current Code of Meeting Practice outlines the order of business for ordinary council meetings. Closed (Confidential) Committee Items are currently considered at 6.30pm prior to the Ordinary Council Meeting commencing at 7.00pm. It is recommended that Closed Committee Items be moved from the current 6.30pm timeslot and be listed as the last item on the council business paper agenda. This is consistent with the Model Code of Meeting Practice in terms of its Order of Business.

 

·    Section 3.1 specifies the timing of Ordinary Council Meetings and references the third Monday of each month as the day in which meetings will be generally held. It is recommended that this section of the Code be reworded to remove the specified day and instead reference that the day be consistent with Council’s Ordinary Council Meeting Schedule, as adopted by Council each year.

 

·    Section’s 5.15 to 5.29 (inclusive) are new non-mandatory provisions and relate to ‘meetings held by audio/visual link’. Council has previously advocated that, notwithstanding the benefits of meetings via audio/visual link, physical attendance by Councillors at Council Meetings (where public health orders allow) ought to be the default position.

 

Aside from illness, disability or caring responsibilities (which are covered by section 5.23 in the Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022), it was felt that acceptable reasons for not physically attending council meetings should be limited to exceptional circumstances and not include instances where Councillors elect to be in another location (for example, have personal commitments (including work and holidays) that preclude their physical attendance).

 

It is recommended that section 5.23(b) of the Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022 be worded such that physical attendance at Council meetings be Council’s default position, reasons for requesting attendance at council meetings via audio/visual link be limited to exceptional circumstances, and that personal commitments (including work and holidays) are not considered acceptable reasons for attending council meetings via audio/visual link.          

 

Community Consultation

 

Statement of Intent

 

The consultation is designed to ascertain the community’s views on the Draft Code of Meeting Practice. Any comments received will be reviewed and evaluated to determine whether to incorporate any amendments or additional supplementary provisions.

 

Method

 

Level of Participation

Inform

Consult

Form of Participation

Open

Open

Target Audience

Lane Cove Community

Lane Cove Community

Proposed Medium

e-Newsletter

 

Website Exhibition

“Have Your Say”

Indicative Timing

 Late February to Early April

 

Conclusion

 

The new Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW, was published in the Gazette on 29 October 2021, as prescribed for the purposes of the Act, section 360(1).

 

It is recommended that Council adopts the mandatory provisions set out in this Model Code including the non-mandatory provisions identified in Council’s Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022.

 

It is recommended that the Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022 be adopted for the purpose of community consultation and that a further report be received by Council following the public exhibition period. 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That:-

 

1.   Council adopt, for the purpose of public exhibition, the Draft Code of Meeting Practice 2022 which includes both mandatory and non-mandatory provisions, consistent with the Office of Local Government’s Model Code of Meeting Practice and ‘other proposed amendments’ as outlined in this report;

2.   Council undertake community consultation for a period of six (6) weeks as per the consultation plan outlined in this report; and

3.   Following the public exhibition period, the Draft Code of Meeting Practice, together with a report on any submissions received and any proposed amendments, be considered at the Council meeting to be held 19 April 2022.

 

Steven Kludass

Executive Manager - Corporate Services

Corporate Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Draft Code of Meeting Practice (2022)

60 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

Draft Code of Meeting Practice (2022)

 

Logo Watermark,councilservicesbanner 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                                                                                                                                         



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS.. 2

1.        Introduction.. 4

2.        Meeting Principles. 5

3.        Before the Meeting. 6

Timing of Ordinary Council Meetings. 6

Extraordinary Meetings. 6

Notice to the Public of Council Meetings. 6

Notice to Councillors of Ordinary Council Meetings. 7

Notice to Councillors of Extraordinary Meetings. 7

Giving Notice of Business to be Considered at Council Meetings. 7

Questions with Notice. 8

Agenda and Business Papers for Ordinary Meetings. 8

Statement of Ethical Obligations. 9

Availability of the Agenda and Business Papers to the Public. 9

Agenda and Business Papers for Extraordinary Meetings. 11

Pre-Meeting Briefing Sessions. 11

4.        Public Forums. 12

5.        Coming Together 14

Attendance by Councillors at Meetings. 14

The Quorum for a Meeting. 15

Meetings Held by Audio-Visual Link. 16

Attendance by Councillors at Meetings by Audio-Visual Link. 16

Entitlement of the Public to Attend Council Meetings. 19

Webcasting of Meetings. 19

Attendance of the General Manager and Other Staff at Meetings. 20

6.        The Chairperson.. 22

The Chairperson at Meetings. 22

Election of the Chairperson in the Absence of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor 22

Chairperson to Have Precedence. 23

7.        Modes of Address. 24

8.        Order of Business for Ordinary Council Meetings. 25

9.        Consideration of Business at Council Meetings. 26

Business that can be dealt with at a council meeting. 26

Mayoral Minutes. 26

Staff Reports. 27

Reports of Committees of Council 27

Questions. 27

10.     Rules of Debate. 29

Motions to be Seconded. 29

Notices of Motion. 29

Chairperson’s Duties with Respect to Motions. 29

Motions Requiring the Expenditure of Funds. 30

Amendments to Motions. 30

Foreshadowed Motions. 30

Limitations on the Number and Duration of Speeches. 31

11.     Voting. 33

Voting Entitlements of Councillors. 33

Voting at Council Meetings. 33

Voting on Planning Decisions. 33

12.     Committee of the Whole. 35

13.     Dealing with Items by Exception.. 36

14.     Closure of Council Meetings to the Public. 37

Grounds on Which Meetings Can be Closed to the Public. 37

Matters to be Considered When Closing Meetings to the Public. 38

Notice of Likelihood of Closure Not Required in Urgent Cases. 39

Representations by Members of the Public. 39

Expulsion of Non-Councillors From Meetings Closed to the Public. 40

Obligations of Councillors Attending Meetings by Audio-Visual Link. 40

Information to be Disclosed in Resolutions Closing Meetings to the Public. 40

Resolutions Passed at Closed Meetings to be Made Public. 42

15.     Keeping Order at Meetings. 43

Points of Order 43

Questions of Order 43

Motions of Dissent 43

Acts of Disorder 44

How Disorder at a Meeting May be Dealt With. 44

Expulsion from Meetings. 45

How Disorder by Councillors Attending Meetings by Audio-Visual Link may be Dealt With. 45

Use of Mobile Phones and the Unauthorised Recording of Meetings. 46

16.     Conflicts of Interest 47

17.     Decision of the Council 48

Council Decisions. 48

Rescinding or Altering Council Decisions. 48

Recommitting Resolutions to Correct an Error 49

18.     Time Limits on Council Meetings. 51

19.     After the Meeting. 52

Minutes of Meetings. 52

Access to Correspondence and Reports Laid on the Table at, or Submitted to, a Meeting. 53

Implementation of Decisions of the Council 53

20.     Council Committee. 54

Application of This Part 54

Council Committees Whose Members are All Councillors. 54

Functions of Committees. 54

Notice of Committee Meetings. 54

Attendance at Committee Meetings. 54

Non-Members Entitled to Attend Committee Meetings. 55

Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson of Council Committees. 55

Procedure in Committee Meetings. 55

Closure of Committee Meetings to the Public. 56

Disorder in Committee Meetings. 56

Minutes of Council Committee Meetings. 56

21.     Irregularities. 58

22.     Definitions. 59

 

 


 


 

1.     Introduction

 

The new changes made by the NSW OLG’s New Model Meeting Code (29 October 2021) for inclusion in Council’s Code are shown in red-scarlet font and/or with strikethrough. These will be mandatory provisions. Where there are non-mandatory provisions, they will be indicated as non-mandatory.

Non-mandatory provisions cover areas of meeting practice that are common to most councils but where there may be a need for some variation in practice between councils based on local circumstances. The non-mandatory provisions also operate to set a benchmark based on what OLG sees as best practice for the relevant area of practice.

 

This revised Draft Code of Meeting Practice has been developed in line with the NSW Office of Local Government’s New Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW (the Model Meeting Code) of 29 October 2021, made under section 360 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 2021 (the Regulation).

This Code applies to all meetings of councils and committees of councils of which all the members are councillors (committees of council). Council committees whose members include persons other than councillors may adopt their own rules for meetings unless the council determines otherwise.

This Code incorporates the mandatory provisions along with relevant non-mandatory provisions of the new Model Meeting Code (Model Meeting Code) and other supplementary provisions which are not inconsistent with the mandatory provisions of the new Model Meeting Code.

2.     Meeting Principles

 

2.1       Council and committee meetings should be:

Transparent:   Decisions are made in a way that is open and accountable.

Informed:         Decisions are made based on relevant, quality information.

Inclusive:         Decisions respect the diverse needs and interests of the local community.

Principled:       Decisions are informed by the principles prescribed under Chapter 3 of the Act.

Trusted:           The community has confidence that councillors and staff act ethically and make decisions in the interests of the whole community.

Respectful:      Councillors, staff and meeting attendees treat each other with respect.

Effective:          Meetings are well organised, effectively run and skilfully chaired.

Orderly:            Councillors, staff and meeting attendees behave in a way that contributes to the orderly conduct of the meeting.

3.     Before the Meeting

Timing of Ordinary Council Meetings

3.1       Ordinary meetings of the council will be held generally on the following occasions: the third Monday of each month from February to December with the exception of July when the Ordinary meeting shall generally be held on the fourth Monday of that month and December when the Ordinary meeting shall generally be held on the first Monday of that month.

3.2       The council shall, by resolution, set the frequency, time, date and place of its ordinary meetings.

Note:       Under section 365 of the Act, councils are required to meet at least ten (10) times each year, each time in a different month unless the Minister for Local Government has approved a reduction in the number of times that a council is required to meet each year under section 365A.

Extraordinary Meetings

3.3       If the mayor receives a request in writing, signed by at least two (2) councillors, the mayor must call an extraordinary meeting of the council to be held as soon as practicable, but in any event, no more than 14 days after receipt of the request. In no case shall notice of less than twenty-four (24) hours be given. The mayor can be one of the two councillors requesting the meeting [Pol].

Note:       Clause 3.3 reflects section 366 of the Act.

3.4       Notwithstanding clause 3.3 the mayor (or the deputy mayor if acting for the mayor), may, at his/her discretion, call meetings of the council, notice of which shall be given in accordance with this Code. 

Notice to the Public of Council Meetings

3.5       The council must give notice to the public of the time, date and place of each of its meetings, including extraordinary meetings and of each meeting of committees of the council.

Note:       Clause 3.5 reflects section 9(1) of the Act.

3.6       For the purposes of clause 3.5, notice of a meeting of the council and of a committee of council is to be published before the meeting takes place. The notice must be published on the council’s website, and in such other manner that the council is satisfied is likely to bring notice of the meeting to the attention of as many people as possible.

3.7       For the purposes of clause 3.5, notice of more than one (1) meeting may be given in the same notice.


Notice to Councillors of Ordinary Council Meetings

3.78     The general manager must send to each councillor, at least three (3) days before each meeting of the council, a notice specifying the time, date and place at which the meeting is to be held, and the business proposed to be considered at the meeting.

Note:   Clause 3.78 reflects section 367(1) of the Act.

3.89     For the purpose of clause 3.78, three (3) days notice before a meeting of the Council includes a Saturday, Sunday and/or a Public Holiday.

3.910   The notice and the agenda for, and the business papers relating to, the meeting may be given to councillors in electronic form, but only if all councillors have facilities to access the notice, agenda and business papers in that form.

Note:   Clause 3.910 reflects section 367(3) of the Act.

Notice to Councillors of Extraordinary Meetings

3.101   Notice of less than three (3) days may be given to councillors of an extraordinary meeting of the council in cases of emergency.

Note:       Clause 3.101 reflects section 367(2) of the Act.

Giving Notice of Business to be Considered at Council Meetings

3.112   A councillor may give notice of any business they wish to be considered by the council at its next ordinary meeting by way of a notice of motion. To be included on the agenda of the meeting, the notice of motion must be in writing and must be submitted (4) business days before the meeting is to be held (midnight on the Tuesday preceding the meeting) [Pol].

3.123   A councillor may, in writing to the general manager, request the withdrawal of a notice of motion submitted by them prior to its inclusion in the agenda and business paper for the meeting at which it is to be considered.

3.134   If the general manager considers that a notice of motion submitted by a councillor for consideration at an ordinary meeting of the council has legal, strategic, financial or policy implications which should be taken into consideration by the meeting, the general manager may prepare a report in relation to the notice of motion for inclusion with the business papers for the meeting at which the notice of motion is to be considered by the council.

3.145   A notice of motion for the expenditure of funds on works and/or services other than those already provided for in the council’s current adopted operational plan must identify the source of funding for the expenditure that is the subject of the notice of motion. If the notice of motion does not identify a funding source, the general manager must either:

(a)        prepare a report on the availability of funds for implementing the motion if adopted for inclusion in the business papers for the meeting at which the notice of motion is to be considered by the council, or

(b)        by written notice sent to all councillors with the business papers for the meeting for which the notice of motion has been submitted, defer consideration of the matter by the council to such a date specified in the notice, pending the preparation of such a report.

Questions with Notice

3.156   A councillor may, by way of a notice submitted under clause 3.112, ask a question for response by the general manager about the performance or operations of the council.

3.167   A councillor is not permitted to ask a question with notice under clause 3.156 that comprises a complaint against the general manager or a member of staff of the council, or a question that implies wrongdoing by the general manager or a member of staff of the council.

3.178   The general manager or their nominee may respond to a question with notice submitted under clause 3.156 by way of a report included in the business papers for the relevant meeting of the council or orally at the meeting.

Agenda and Business Papers for Ordinary Meetings

3.189   The general manager must cause the agenda for a meeting of the council or a committee of the council to be prepared as soon as practicable before the meeting.

3.1920 The general manager must ensure that the agenda for an ordinary meeting of the council states:

(a)        all matters to be dealt with arising out of the proceedings of previous meetings of the council, and

(b)        if the mayor is the chairperson – any matter or topic that the chairperson proposes, at the time when the agenda is prepared, to put to the meeting, and

(c)        all matters, including matters that are the subject of staff reports and reports of committees, to be considered at the meeting, and

(d)        any business of which due notice has been given under clause 3.112.

3.201   Nothing in clause 3.1920 limits the powers of the mayor to put a mayoral minute to a meeting under clause 9.6.

3.212   The general manager must not include in the agenda for a meeting of the council any business of which due notice has been given if, in the opinion of the general manager, the business is, or the implementation of the business would be, unlawful. The general manager must report, without giving details of the item of business, any such exclusion to the next meeting of the council.

3.223   Where the agenda includes the receipt of information or discussion of other matters that, in the opinion of the general manager, is likely to take place when the meeting is closed to the public, the general manager must ensure that the agenda of the meeting:

(a)     identifies the relevant item of business and indicates that it is of such a nature (without disclosing details of the information to be considered when the meeting is closed to the public), and

(b)     states the grounds under section 10A(2) of the Act relevant to the item of business.

Note:       Clause 3.223 reflects section 9(2A) (a) of the Act.

3.234   The general manager must ensure that the details of any item of business which, in the opinion of the general manager, is likely to be considered when the meeting is closed to the public, are included in a business paper provided to councillors for the meeting concerned. Such details must not be included in the business papers made available to the public, and must not be disclosed by a councillor or by any other person to another person who is not authorised to have that information.

3.245   Any matter considered urgent by the general manager which arises after the distribution of Business Papers, may be circulated to Councillors immediately prior to the meeting via a late items supplementary agenda.  In such circumstances if requested by one (1) or more Councillors, prior to discussion or determination of the matter, the Chairperson shall allow a period of time for Councillors to read the report. 

Statement of Ethical Obligations

[corresponding to 3.23 in new Model Meeting Code]

3.26     Business papers for all ordinary and extraordinary meetings of the council and committees of the council must contain a statement reminding councillors of their oath or affirmation of office made under section 233A of the Act and their obligations under the council’s code of conduct to disclose and appropriately manage conflicts of interest.

Availability of the Agenda and Business Papers to the Public

3.257   Copies of the agenda and the associated business papers, such as correspondence and reports for meetings of the council and committees of council, are to be published on the council’s website, and must be made available to the public for inspection, or for taking away by any person free of charge at the offices of the council, at the relevant meeting and at such other venues determined by the council.

Note:       Clause 3.257 reflects section 9(2) and (4) of the Act.

3.268   Clause 3.257 does not apply to the business papers for items of business that the general manager has identified under clause 3.223 as being likely to be considered when the meeting is closed to the public.

Note:       Clause 3.268 reflects section 9(2A) (b) of the Act.

3.279   For the purposes of clause 3.257, copies of agendas and business papers must be published on the council’s website and made available to the public at a time that is as close as possible to the time they are available to councillors.

Note:       Clause 3.279 reflects section 9(3) of the Act.

3.2830 A copy of an agenda, or of an associated business paper made available under clause 3.25, may in addition be given or made available in electronic form.

Note:       Clause 3.2830 reflects section 9(5) of the Act.

Agenda and Business Papers for Extraordinary Meetings

3.2931 The general manager must ensure that the agenda for an extraordinary meeting of the council deals only with the matters stated in the notice of the meeting.

3.302   Despite clause 3.2931, business may be considered at an extraordinary meeting of the council, even though due notice of the business has not been given, if:

(a)        a motion is passed to have the business considered at the meeting, and

(b)        the business to be considered is ruled by the chairperson to be of great urgency on the grounds that it requires a decision by the council before the next scheduled ordinary meeting of the council.

3.313   A motion moved under clause 3.302(a) can be moved without notice but only after the business notified in the agenda for the extraordinary meeting has been dealt with.

3.324   Despite clauses 10.21–10.32, only the mover of a motion moved under clause 3.302(a) can speak to the motion before it is put.

3.335   A motion of dissent cannot be moved against a ruling of the chairperson under clause 3.302(b) on whether a matter is of great urgency.

Pre-Meeting Briefing Sessions

3.346   Prior to each ordinary meeting of the council, the general manager may arrange a pre-meeting briefing session to brief councillors on business to be considered at the meeting. Pre-meeting briefing sessions may also be held for extraordinary meetings of the council and meetings of committees of the council.

3.357   Pre-meeting briefing sessions are to be held in the absence of the public.

 

[corresponding to 3.35 in new Model Meeting Code non-mandatory provision]

3.38     Pre-meeting briefing sessions may be held by audio-visual link. [non-mandatory provision]

3.369   The general manager or a member of staff nominated by the general manager is to preside at pre-meeting briefing sessions.

3.3740 Councillors must not use pre-meeting briefing sessions to debate or make preliminary decisions on items of business they are being briefed on, and any debate and decision-making must be left to the formal council or committee meeting at which the item of business is to be considered.

3.3841 Councillors (including the mayor) must declare and manage any conflicts of interest they may have in relation to any item of business that is the subject of a briefing at a pre-meeting briefing session, in the same way that they are required to do so at a council or committee meeting. The council is to maintain a written record of all conflict of interest declarations made at pre-meeting briefing sessions and how the conflict of interest was managed by the councillor who made the declaration.

4.     Public Forums

4.1       The council may hold a public forum prior to each ordinary meeting of the council for the purpose of hearing oral submissions from members of the public on any item or subject that a resident wishes to raise. Public forums may also be held prior to extraordinary council meetings and meetings of committees of the council only on items of business listed on the agenda [Pol].

            Note:       The general order of business for an ordinary meeting of the council         includes a public forum conducted during the meeting.  

[new in Model Meeting Code non-mandatory provision]

4.2       Public forums may be held by audio-visual link. [non-mandatory provision]

4.23     Public forums are to be chaired by the Chairperson of the meeting.

4.34     Public Forums shall be limited to two (2) hours’ duration.    

4.45     To speak at a public forum, a person wishing to address the council during a public forum must register their details with Council by 5:00pm on the day of the Council meeting at which the individual is speaking. This information includes:-

a.    Identification of the matter on which the person wishes to speak; and

b.    The speakers name and address; and

c.    Relevant contact information (email and phone number) to allow Council to follow up with speaker should this be required.

4.56     Speakers at the Public Forum will be invited by the Chairperson, in order of registration, to address the Council.

4.67     Speakers who have not registered to speak at the public forum may be invited to address Council by the Chairperson after the registered speakers have addressed Council.

4.78     A person may speak on any number of items of business on the agenda of the council meeting or on any other topic.

4.89     A representative acting on behalf of others, including legal representatives and consultants, are not to be permitted to speak at a public forum unless they identify their status as a representative when applying to speak at the public forum.

4.910   Each speaker will be allowed a maximum of three (3) minutes to address the Council. This time is to be strictly enforced by the Chairperson.

4.101   Speakers at the public forum are to register with the Council any visual or audio material to be presented to the Council at the public forum in support of their address within their timeframe allocated in 4.9, and to identify any equipment needs by 12 noon on the day of the council meeting at which the individual is speaking. The General Manager or their delegate may refuse to allow such material to be presented.

4.112   A councillor (including the chairperson) may, through the chairperson, ask questions of a speaker following their address at a public forum in order to clarify an issue, but will not otherwise question the Speaker. Questions put to a speaker must be direct, succinct and without argument.

4.123   Speakers are under no obligation to answer a question put under clause 4.112. Answers by the speaker, to each question are to be limited to one (1) minute.

4.134   If a speaker at a public forum poses a question to the Council, Councillors or Council staff, the question is not required to be answered during the public forum.

4.145   The General Manager may, with the concurrence of the Chairperson, address the Council during a public forum to clarify an issue.

4.156   When addressing the council, speakers at public forums must comply with this code and all other relevant council codes, policies and procedures. Speakers must refrain from engaging in disorderly conduct, publicly alleging breaches of the council’s code of conduct or making other potentially defamatory statements.

4.167   If the chairperson considers that a speaker at a public forum has engaged in conduct of the type referred to in clause 4.156, the chairperson may request the person to refrain from the inappropriate behaviour and to withdraw and unreservedly apologise for any inappropriate comments. Where the speaker fails to comply with the chairperson’s request, the chairperson may immediately require the person to stop speaking.

4.178   Clause 4.167 does not limit the ability of the chairperson to deal with disorderly conduct by speakers at public forums in accordance with the provisions of Part 15 of this code.

5.     Coming Together

Attendance by Councillors at Meetings

5.1       All councillors must make reasonable efforts to attend meetings of the council and of committees of the council of which they are members.

Note:       A councillor may not attend a meeting as a councillor (other than the first meeting of the council after the councillor is elected or a meeting at which the councillor takes an oath or makes an affirmation of office) until they have taken an oath or made an affirmation of office in the form prescribed under section 233A of the Act.

5.2       A councillor cannot participate in a meeting of the council or of a committee of the council unless personally present at the meeting, unless permitted to attend the meeting by audio-visual link under this code. [new in Model Meeting Code]

5.3       Where a councillor is unable to attend one or more ordinary meetings of the council, the councillor should request that the council grant them a leave of absence from those meetings. This clause does not prevent a councillor from making an apology if they are unable to attend a meeting. However the acceptance of such an apology does not constitute the granting of a leave of absence for the purposes of this code and the Act.

5.4       A councillor’s request for leave of absence from council meetings should, if practicable, identify (by date) the meetings from which the councillor intends to be absent and the grounds upon which the leave of absence is being sought.

5.5       The council must act reasonably when considering whether to grant a councillor’s request for a leave of absence.

5.6       A councillor’s civic office will become vacant if the councillor is absent from three (3) consecutive ordinary meetings of the council without prior leave of the council, or leave granted by the council at any of the meetings concerned, unless the holder is absent because they have been suspended from office under the Act, or because the council has been suspended under the Act, or as a consequence of a compliance order under section 438HA.

Note:       Clause 5.6 reflects section 234(1) (d) of the Act.

5.7       A councillor who intends to attend a meeting of the council despite having been granted a leave of absence should, if practicable, give the general manager at least two (2) days’ notice of their intention to attend.

The Quorum for a Meeting                                                                 

5.8       The quorum for a meeting of the council is a majority of the councillors of the council who hold office at that time and are not suspended from office.

Note:       Clause 5.8 reflects section 368(1) of the Act.

5.9       Clause 5.8 does not apply if the quorum is required to be determined in accordance with directions of the Minister in a performance improvement order issued in respect of the council.

Note:       Clause 5.9 reflects section 368(2) of the Act.

5.10     A meeting of the council must be adjourned if a quorum is not present:

(a)        at the commencement of the meeting where the number of apologies received for the meeting indicates that there will not be a quorum for the meeting, or

(b)        within half an hour after the time designated for the holding of the meeting, or

(c)        at any time during the meeting.

5.11     In either case, the meeting must be adjourned to a time, date and place fixed:

(a)        by the chairperson, or

(b)        in the chairperson’s absence, by the majority of the councillors present, or

(c)        failing that, by the general manager.

5.12     The general manager must record in the council’s minutes the circumstances relating to the absence of a quorum (including the reasons for the absence of a quorum) at or arising during a meeting of the council, together with the names of the councillors present.

5.13     Where, prior to the commencement of a meeting, it becomes apparent that a quorum may not be present at the meeting, or that the health, safety and or welfare of councillors, council staff and members of the public may be put at risk by attending the meeting because of a natural disaster (such as, but not limited to flood or bushfire), or a public health emergency, the mayor may, in consultation with the general manager and, as far as is practicable, with each councillor, cancel the meeting. Where a meeting is cancelled, notice of the cancellation must be published on the council’s website and in such other manner that the council is satisfied is likely to bring notice of the cancellation to the attention of as many people as possible. [corresponds to 5.14 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.14     Where a meeting is cancelled under clause 5.13, the business to be considered at the meeting may instead be considered, where practicable, at the next ordinary meeting of the council or at an extraordinary meeting called under clause 3.3.

[New in Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provisions]

Meetings Held by Audio-Visual Link

 

[corresponds to 5.16 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.15     A meeting of the council or a committee of the council may be held by audio-visual link where the mayor determines that the meeting should be held by audio-visual link because of a natural disaster or a public health emergency. The mayor may only make a determination under this clause where they are satisfied that attendance at the meeting may put the health and safety of councillors and staff at risk. The mayor must make a determination under this clause in consultation with the general manager and, as far as is practicable, with each councillor.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.17 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.16     Where the mayor determines under clause 5.16 that a meeting is to be held by audio-visual link, the general manager must:

(a)        give written notice to all councillors that the meeting is to be held by audio-visual link, and

(b)        take all reasonable steps to ensure that all councillors can participate in the meeting by audio-visual link, and

(c)        cause a notice to be published on the council’s website and in such other manner the general manager is satisfied will bring it to the attention of as many people as possible, advising that the meeting is to be held by audio-visual link and providing information about where members of the public may view the meeting.

[corresponds to 5.18 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.17     This code applies to a meeting held by audio-visual link under clause 5.16 in the same way it would if the meeting was held in person.

Note: Where a council holds a meeting by audio-visual link under clause 5.15, it is still required under section 10 of the Act to provide a physical venue for members of the public to attend in person and observe the meeting.

[New in Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provisions]

Attendance by Councillors at Meetings by Audio-Visual Link

 

[corresponds to 5.19 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.18     Councillors may attend and participate in meetings of the council and committees of the council by audio-visual link with the approval of the council or the relevant committee.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.20 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.19     A request by a councillor for approval to attend a meeting by audio-visual link must be made in writing to the general manager prior to the meeting in question and must provide reasons why the councillor will be prevented from attending the meeting in person.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.21 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.20     Councillors may request approval to attend more than one meeting by audio-visual link. Where a councillor requests approval to attend more than one meeting by audio-visual link, the request must specify the meetings the request relates to in addition to the information required under clause 5.19.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.22 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.21     The council must comply with the Health Privacy Principles prescribed under the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 when collecting, holding, using and disclosing health information in connection with a request by a councillor to attend a meeting by audio-visual link.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.23 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.22     A councillor who has requested approval to attend a meeting of the council or a committee of the council by audio-visual link may participate in the meeting by audio-visual link until the council or committee determines whether to approve their request and is to be taken as present at the meeting. The councillor may participate in a decision in relation to their request to attend the meeting by audio-visual link.

 

[corresponds to 5.24 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.23     A decision whether to approve a request by a councillor to attend a meeting of the council or a committee of the council by audio-visual link must be made by a resolution of the council or the committee concerned. The resolution must state:

(a)        the meetings the resolution applies to, and

(b)        the reason why the councillor is being permitted to attend the meetings by audio-visual link where it is on grounds other than illness, disability, or caring responsibilities.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.25 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.24     If the council or committee refuses a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link, their link to the meeting is to be terminated.

 

[corresponds to 5.26 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.25     A decision whether to approve a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link is at the council’s or the relevant committee’s discretion. The council and committees of the council must act reasonably when considering requests by councillors to attend meetings by audio-visual link. However, the council and committees of the council are under no obligation to approve a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link where the technical capacity does not exist to allow the councillor to attend the meeting by these means.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.27 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.26     The council and committees of the council may refuse a councillor’s request to attend a meeting by audio-visual link where the council or committee is satisfied that the councillor has failed to appropriately declare and manage conflicts of interest, observe confidentiality or to comply with this code on one or more previous occasions they have attended a meeting of the council or a committee of the council by audio-visual link.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.28 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.27     This code applies to a councillor attending a meeting by audio-visual link in the same way it would if the councillor was attending the meeting in person. Where a councillor is permitted to attend a meeting by audio-visual link under this code, they are to be taken as attending the meeting in person for the purposes of the code and will have the same voting rights as if they were attending the meeting in person.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.29 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.28     A councillor must give their full attention to the business and proceedings of the meeting when attending a meeting by audio-visual link. The councillor’s camera must be on at all times during the meeting except as may be otherwise provided for under this code.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.30 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

5.29     A councillor must be appropriately dressed when attending a meeting by audio-visual link and must ensure that no items are within sight of the meeting that are inconsistent with the maintenance of order at the meeting or that are likely to bring the council or the committee into disrepute.

 

Entitlement of the Public to Attend Council Meetings

5.1530 Everyone is entitled to attend a meeting of the council and committees of the council. The council must ensure that all meetings of the council and committees of the council are open to the public.

Note:       Clause 5.1530 reflects section 10(1) of the Act.

5.1631 Notwithstanding clause 5.1530, a limitation may be placed on the number of members of the public admitted to a meeting of the Council or a Committee of the Council, where such a limitation is for reason of safety or security. 

5.1732 Clause 5.1530 does not apply to parts of meetings that have been closed to the public under section 10A of the Act.

5.1833 A person (whether a councillor or another person) is not entitled to be present at a meeting of the council or a committee of the council if expelled from the meeting:

(a)     by a resolution of the meeting, or

(b)     by the person presiding at the meeting if the council has, by resolution, authorised the person presiding to exercise the power of expulsion.

Note:       Clause 5.1833 reflects section 10(2) of the Act.

Note:       Clause 15.14 confers a standing authorisation on all chairpersons of meetings of the council and committees of the council to expel persons from meetings.

Webcasting of Meetings

[new in Model Meeting Code]

5.1934 Each meeting of the council or a committee of the council is to be recorded by means of an audio or audio-visual device. [new in Model Meeting Code] All meetings of the council and committees of the council are to be live webcast on the council’s website.

 

5.2035 Clause 5.1934 does not apply to parts of a meeting that have been closed to the public under section 10A of the Act.

           

[but note 5.35 may be redundant/removed due to proposed new clause 5.39, based on new Model Meeting Code’s clause 5.38 – see below]

 

 

 

[corresponds to 5.35 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

5.2136 At the start of each meeting of the council or a committee of the council, the chairperson must inform the persons attending the meeting that:

 

(a)        the meeting is being recorded and made publicly available on the council’s website, and

(b)        persons attending the meeting should refrain from making any defamatory statements.

 

 

At the start of each meeting the chairperson is to make a statement informing those in attendance that the meeting is being webcast and that those in attendance should refrain from making any defamatory statements.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.36 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

5.2237 The recording of a meeting is to be made publicly available on the council’s website:

 

(a)     at the same time as the meeting is taking place, or

(b)     as soon as practicable after the meeting.

A recording of each meeting of the council and committee of the council is to be retained on the council’s website for four (4) years. Recordings of meetings may be disposed of in accordance with the State Records Act 1998.

 

 

[corresponds to 5.37 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

5.38       The recording of a meeting is to be made publicly available on the council’s website for at least 12 months after the meeting.

             

 

[corresponds to 5.38 in new Model Meeting Code]

 

5.39       Clauses 5.37 and 5.38 do not apply to any part of a meeting that has been closed to the public in accordance with section 10A of the Act.

             

              Note: Clauses 5.34 – 5.39 reflect section 236 of the Regulation.

 

[corresponds to 5.39 in new Model Code]

 

5.40       Recordings of meetings may be disposed of in accordance with the State Records Act 1998.

Attendance of the General Manager and Other Staff at Meetings

5.2341 The general manager is entitled to attend, but not to vote at, a meeting of the council or a meeting of a committee of the council of which all of the members are councillors.

Note:       Clause 5.2341 reflects section 376(1) of the Act.

5.2442 The general manager is entitled to attend a meeting of any other committee of the council and may, if a member of the committee, exercise a vote.

Note:     Clause 5.2442 reflects section 376(2) of the Act.

5.2543 The general manager may be excluded from a meeting of the council or a committee while the council or committee deals with a matter relating to the standard of performance of the general manager or the terms of employment of the general manager.

Note:       Clause 5.2543 reflects section 376(3) of the Act.

5.2644 The attendance of other council staff at a meeting, (other than as members of the public) shall be with the approval of the general manager.

 

            [corresponds to 5.44 in new Model Meeting Code]

5.45     The general manager and other council staff may attend meetings of the council and committees of the council by audio-visual-link. Attendance by council staff at meetings by audio-visual link (other than as members of the public) shall be with the approval of the general manager. non-mandatory provision]

           

5.2746 The wearing of ties by members of the Council and staff at Council meetings is optional.

5.2847 Smoking is prohibited in the Council Chambers.

5.2948 Consumption of alcohol during any meeting is prohibited.

6. The Chairperson

The Chairperson at Meetings

6.1       The mayor, or at the request of or in the absence of the mayor, the deputy mayor (if any) presides at meetings of the council.

Note:       Clause 6.1 reflects section 369(1) of the Act.

6.2       If the mayor and the deputy mayor (if any) are absent, a councillor elected to chair the meeting by the councillors present presides at a meeting of the council.

Note:       Clause 6.2 reflects section 369(2) of the Act.

Election of the Chairperson in the Absence of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor

6.3       If no chairperson is present at a meeting of the council at the time designated for the holding of the meeting, the first business of the meeting must be the election of a chairperson to preside at the meeting.

6.4       The election of a chairperson must be conducted:

(a)     by the general manager or, in their absence, an employee of the council designated by the general manager to conduct the election, or

(b)     by the person who called the meeting or a person acting on their behalf if neither the general manager nor a designated employee is present at the meeting, or if there is no general manager or designated employee.

6.5       If, at an election of a chairperson, two (2) or more candidates receive the same number of votes and no other candidate receives a greater number of votes, the chairperson is to be the candidate whose name is chosen by lot.

6.6       For the purposes of clause 6.5, the person conducting the election must:

(a)     arrange for the names of the candidates who have equal numbers of votes to be written on similar slips, and

(b)     then fold the slips so as to prevent the names from being seen, mix the slips and draw one of the slips at random.

6.7       The candidate whose name is on the drawn slip is the candidate who is to be the chairperson.

6.8       Any election conducted under clause 6.3, and the outcome of the vote, are to be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.


Chairperson to Have Precedence

6.9       When the chairperson rises or speaks during a meeting of the council:

(a)     any councillor then speaking or seeking to speak must cease speaking and, if standing, immediately resume their seat, and

(b)     every councillor present must be silent to enable the chairperson to be heard without interruption.

7.     Modes of Address

7.1       If the chairperson is the mayor, they are to be addressed as ‘Mr Mayor’ or ‘Madam Mayor’.

7.2       Where the chairperson is not the mayor, they are to be addressed as either ‘Mr Chairperson’ or ‘Madam Chairperson’.

7.3       A councillor is to be addressed as ‘Councillor [surname]’.

7.4       A council officer is to be addressed by their official designation or as Mr/Ms [surname].

 

8. Order of Business for Ordinary Council Meetings

8.1       The general order of business for an ordinary meeting of the council shall be:

1.    Declarations of Interest

2.    Apologies and applications for a leave of absence [new in Model Code] or attendance by audio-visual link by councillors [new in Model Meeting Code – non mandatory provision]

3.    Meeting Prayer

4.    Acknowledgment to Country

5.    Notice about Meeting Webcast

6.    Closed Committee Items

7.    Public Forum

8.    Confirmation of Minutes

9.    Mayoral Minutes

10. Petitions

11. Referred Matters

12. Deferred Reports

13. Orders of the Day

14. Notice of Motion

15. Officer Reports for Determination

16. Officers Reports for Information

17. Questions With Notice

8.2       The order of business as fixed under clause 8.1 may be altered for a particular meeting of the council if a motion to that effect is passed at that meeting. Such a motion can be moved without notice.

8.3       Despite clauses 10.21–10.32, only the mover of a motion referred to in clause 8.2 may speak to the motion before it is put.

8.4       Notwithstanding clause 8.2, council meetings in Closed Committee of the Whole must conclude by 7.00pm sharp and no extension may be permitted beyond this time, the exception being a Council resolution to defer Closed Committee of the Whole to after the conclusion of the public items in the business paper and subject to this Code.

9.     Consideration of Business at Council Meetings

Business that can be dealt with at a council meeting

9.1       The council must not consider business at a meeting of the council:

(a)        unless a councillor has given notice of the business, as required by clause 3.10,  and

(b)        unless notice of the business has been sent to the councillors in accordance with clause 3.7 in the case of an ordinary meeting or clause 3.9 in the case of an extraordinary meeting called in an emergency.

9.2       Clause 9.1 does not apply to the consideration of business at a meeting, if the business:

(a)        is already before, or directly relates to, a matter that is already before the council, at that meeting or

(b)        is the election of a chairperson to preside at the meeting, or

(c)        subject to clause 9.9, is a matter or topic put to the meeting by way of a mayoral minute; or

(d)        is a motion for the adoption of recommendations of a committee, including, but not limited to, a committee of the council; or

(e)        is a report from officers which in the opinion of the Chairperson or the General Manager are urgent.

9.3       Despite clause 9.1, business may be considered at a meeting of the council even though due notice of the business has not been given to the councillors if:

(a)        a motion is passed to have the business considered at the meeting, and

(b)        the business to be considered is ruled by the chairperson to be of great urgency on the grounds that it requires a decision by the council before the next scheduled ordinary meeting of the council.

9.4       A motion moved under clause 9.3(a) can be moved without notice. Despite clauses 10.21–10.32, only the mover of a motion referred to in clause 9.3(a) can speak to the motion before it is put.

9.5       A motion of dissent cannot be moved against a ruling by the chairperson under clause 9.3(b).

Mayoral Minutes

9.6       Subject to clause 9.9, if the mayor is the chairperson at a meeting of the council, the mayor may, by minute signed by the mayor, put to the meeting without notice any matter or topic that is within the jurisdiction of the council, or of which the council has official knowledge.

9.7       A mayoral minute, when put to a meeting, takes precedence over all business on the council’s agenda for the meeting. The chairperson (but only if the chairperson is the mayor) may move the adoption of a mayoral minute without the motion being seconded.

9.8       A recommendation made in a mayoral minute put by the mayor is, so far as it is adopted by the council, a resolution of the council.

9.9       A mayoral minute must not be used to put without notice matters that are routine and not urgent, or matters for which proper notice should be given because of their complexity. For the purpose of this clause, a matter will be urgent where it requires a decision by the council before the next scheduled ordinary meeting of the council.

9.10     Where a mayoral minute makes a recommendation which, if adopted, would require the expenditure of funds on works and/or services other than those already provided for in the council’s current adopted operational plan, it must identify the source of funding for the expenditure that is the subject of the recommendation.  If the mayoral minute does not identify a funding source, the council must defer consideration of the matter, pending a report from the general manager on the availability of funds for implementing the recommendation if adopted.

Staff Reports

9.11     A recommendation made in a staff report is, so far as it is adopted by the council, a resolution of the council.

Reports of Committees of Council

9.12     The recommendations of a committee of the council are, so far as they are adopted by the council, resolutions of the council.

9.13     If in a report of a committee of the council distinct recommendations are made, the council may make separate decisions on each recommendation.

Questions

9.14     A question must not be asked at a meeting of the council unless it concerns a matter on the agenda of the meeting or notice has been given of the question in accordance with clauses 3.10 and 3.14.

9.15     A councillor may, through the chairperson, put a question to another councillor about a matter on the agenda.

9.16     A councillor may, through the general manager, put a question to a council employee about a matter on the agenda. Council employees are only obliged to answer a question put to them through the general manager at the direction of the general manager.

9.17     A councillor or council employee to whom a question is put is entitled to be given reasonable notice of the question and, in particular, sufficient notice to enable reference to be made to other persons or to documents information [new in Model Meeting Code]. Where a councillor or council employee to whom a question is put is unable to respond to the question at the meeting at which it is put, they may take it on notice and report the response to the next meeting of the council.

9.18     Councillors must put questions directly, succinctly, respectfully and without argument.

9.19     The chairperson must not permit discussion on any reply to, or refusal to reply to, a question put to a councillor or council employee.

10.     Rules of Debate

Motions to be Seconded

10.1       A motion or an amendment cannot be debated unless or until it has been seconded. However, the mover of a motion may be allowed by the Chairperson to speak to the motion before calling for the motion to be seconded [Pol].

Notices of Motion

10.2       A councillor who has submitted a notice of motion under clause 3.10 is to move the motion the subject of the notice of motion at the meeting at which it is to be considered.

10.3       If a councillor who has submitted a notice of motion under clause 3.10 wishes to withdraw it after the agenda and business paper for the meeting at which it is to be considered have been sent to councillors, the councillor may request the withdrawal of the motion when it is before the council.

10.4       In the absence of a councillor who has placed a notice of motion on the agenda for a meeting of the council:

(a)        any other councillor may, with the leave of the chairperson, move the motion at the meeting, or

(b)        the chairperson may defer consideration of the motion until the next meeting of the council.

Chairperson’s Duties with Respect to Motions

10.5       It is the duty of the chairperson at a meeting of the council to receive and put to the meeting any lawful motion that is brought before the meeting.

10.6       Where a motion is moved and seconded, the Chairperson shall enquire before the speech in support of the motion whether there is any dissent, if there is no dissent the motion shall then be put without discussion.  When dissent is expressed the speakers shall be in a series of for and against as per clauses 10.21-10.32.

10.7       The chairperson must rule out of order any motion or amendment to a motion that is unlawful or the implementation of which would be unlawful.

10.8       Before ruling out of order a motion or an amendment to a motion under clause 10.7, the chairperson is to give the mover an opportunity to clarify or amend the motion or amendment.

10.9       Any motion, amendment or other matter that the chairperson has ruled out of order is taken to have been lost.

Motions Requiring the Expenditure of Funds

10.10     A motion or an amendment to a motion which if passed would require the expenditure of funds on works and/ or services other than those already provided for in the council’s current adopted operational plan must identify the source of funding for the expenditure that is the subject of the motion. If the motion does not identify a funding source, the council must defer consideration of the matter, pending a report from the general manager on the availability of funds for implementing the motion if adopted.

Amendments to Motions

10.11     An amendment to a motion must be moved and seconded before it can be debated.

10.12     An amendment to a motion must relate to the matter being dealt with in the original motion before the council and must not be a direct negative of the original motion. An amendment to a motion which does not relate to the matter being dealt with in the original motion, or which is a direct negative of the original motion, must be ruled out of order by the chairperson.

10.13     The mover of an amendment is to be given the opportunity to explain any uncertainties in the proposed amendment before a seconder is called for. 

10.14     If an amendment has been lost, a further amendment can be moved to the motion to which the lost amendment was moved, and so on, but no more than one (1) motion and one (1) proposed amendment can be before council at any one time.

10.15     While an amendment is being considered, debate must only occur in relation to the amendment and not the original motion. Debate on the original motion is to be suspended while the amendment to the original motion is being debated.

     Note: The mover of the Motion has the right to speak to the Motion before any consideration of the Amendment.

10.16     If the amendment is carried, it becomes the motion and is to be debated. If the amendment is lost, debate is to resume on the original motion.

10.17     An amendment may become the motion without debate or a vote where it is accepted by the councillor who moved the original motion.

Foreshadowed Motions

10.18     A councillor may propose a foreshadowed motion in relation to the matter the subject of the original motion before the council, without a seconder during debate on the original motion. The foreshadowed motion is only to be considered if the original motion is lost or withdrawn and the foreshadowed motion is then moved and seconded. If the original motion is carried, the foreshadowed motion lapses.

10.19     Where an amendment has been moved and seconded, a councillor may, without a seconder, foreshadow a further amendment that they propose to move after the first amendment has been dealt with. There is no limit to the number of foreshadowed amendments that may be put before the council at any time. However, no discussion can take place on foreshadowed amendments until the previous amendment has been dealt with and the foreshadowed amendment has been moved and seconded.

10.20     Foreshadowed motions and foreshadowed amendments are to be considered in the order in which they are proposed. However, foreshadowed motions cannot be considered until all foreshadowed amendments have been dealt with.

Limitations on the Number and Duration of Speeches

10.21     A councillor who, during a debate at a meeting of the council, moves an original motion, has the right to speak on each amendment to the motion and a right of general reply to all observations that are made during the debate in relation to the motion, and any amendment to it at the conclusion of the debate before the motion (whether amended or not) is finally put.

10.22     A councillor, other than the mover of an original motion, has the right to speak once on the motion and once on each amendment to it.

10.23     The seconder of a motion or of an amendment may reserve the right to speak later in the debate.

10.24     A councillor must not, without the consent of the council, speak more than once on a motion or an amendment, or for longer than three (3) minutes at any one time [Pol].

10.25     Despite clause 10.24, the chairperson may permit a councillor who claims to have been misrepresented or misunderstood to speak more than once on a motion or an amendment, and for longer than three (3) minutes on that motion or amendment to enable the councillor to make a statement limited to explaining the misrepresentation or misunderstanding [Pol].

10.26     Despite clause 10.24, the council may resolve to shorten the duration of speeches to expedite the consideration of business at a meeting.

10.27     Despite clauses 10.21 and 10.21, a councillor may move that a motion or an amendment be now put:

(a)     if the mover of the motion or amendment has spoken in favour of it and no councillor expresses an intention to speak against it, or

(b)     if at least two (2) councillors have spoken in favour of the motion or amendment and at least two (2) councillors have spoken against it.

10.28     The chairperson must immediately put to the vote, without debate, a motion moved under clause 10.27. A seconder is not required for such a motion.

10.29     If a motion that the original motion or an amendment be now put is passed, the chairperson must, without further debate, put the original motion or amendment to the vote immediately after the mover of the original motion has exercised their right of reply under clause 10.21.

10.30     If a motion that the original motion or an amendment be now put is lost, the chairperson must allow the debate on the original motion or the amendment to be resumed.

10.31     All councillors must be heard without interruption and all other councillors must, unless otherwise permitted under this code, remain silent while another councillor is speaking.

10.32     Once the debate on a matter has concluded and a matter has been dealt with, the chairperson must not allow further debate on the matter.

11.     Voting

Voting Entitlements of Councillors

11.1       Each councillor is entitled to one (1) vote.

Note:     Clause 11.1 reflects section 370(1)of the Act.

11.2       The person presiding at a meeting of the council has, in the event of an equality of votes, a second or casting vote.

Note:     Clause 11.2 reflects section 370(2) of the Act.

11.3       Where the chairperson declines to exercise, or fails to exercise, their second or casting vote, in the event of an equality of votes, the motion being voted upon is lost.

Voting at Council Meetings

11.5       A councillor who is present at a meeting of the council but who fails to vote on a motion put to the meeting is taken to have voted against the motion

11.6       Voting at a meeting, including voting in an election at a meeting, is to be by open means (such as on the voices, by show of hands or by a visible electronic voting system). However, the council may resolve that the voting in any election by councillors for mayor or deputy mayor is to be by secret ballot.

11.7       All voting at council meetings, (including meetings that are closed to the public), must be recorded in the minutes of meetings with the names of councillors who voted for and against each motion or amendment, (including defeated motions and amendments and the use of the casting vote), being recorded [Pol].

11.8       Where the Mayor is of the opinion that the vote on a motion was carried unanimously he/she declares it to be so and the minutes will record unanimity.  Should any Councillor disagree with the Mayor's declaration, the Councillor may raise it and the Mayor shall then put the question again and the Councillor shall vote by show of hands.

11.9       If the result is anything other than unanimous, hands shall be kept up until the minute taker has indicated to the Mayor that the voting has been recorded.

Voting on Planning Decisions

11.10     The general manager must keep a register containing, for each planning decision made at a meeting of the council or a council committee (including, but not limited to a committee of the council), the names of the councillors who supported the decision and the names of any councillors who opposed (or are taken to have opposed) the decision.

11.11     For the purpose of maintaining the register, a division is taken to have been called whenever a motion for a planning decision is put at a meeting of the council or a council committee.

11.12     Each decision recorded in the register is to be described in the register or identified in a manner that enables the description to be obtained from another publicly available document.

11.13     Clauses 11.10–11.12 apply also to meetings that are closed to the public.

Note:     Clauses 11.10–11.13 reflect section 375A of the Act.

Note:     The requirements of clause 11.10 may be satisfied by maintaining a register of the minutes of each planning decision.

12.     Committee of the Whole

12.1       The council may resolve itself into a committee to consider any matter before the council.

Note:  Clause 12.1 reflects section 373 of the Act.

12.2       All the provisions of this code relating to meetings of the council, so far as they are applicable, extend to and govern the proceedings of the council when in committee of the whole, except the provisions limiting the number and duration of speeches.

Note:   Clauses 10.21–10.32 limit the number and duration of speeches.

12.3       The general manager or, in the absence of the general manager, an employee of the council designated by the general manager, is responsible for reporting to the council the proceedings of the committee of the whole. It is not necessary to report the proceedings in full but any recommendations of the committee must be reported.

12.4       The council must ensure that a report of the proceedings (including any recommendations of the committee) is recorded in the council’s minutes. However, the council is not taken to have adopted the report until a motion for adoption has been made and passed.

13.    Dealing with Items by Exception

 

13.1       The council or a committee of council may, at any time, resolve to adopt multiple items of business on the agenda together by way of a single resolution.

13.2       Before the council or committee resolves to adopt multiple items of business on the agenda together under clause 13.1, the chairperson must list the items of business to be adopted and ask councillors to identify any individual items of business listed by the chairperson that they intend to vote against the recommendation made in the business paper or that they wish to speak on.

13.3       The council or committee must not resolve to adopt any item of business under clause 13.1 that a councillor has identified as being one they intend to vote against the recommendation made in the business paper or to speak on.

13.4       Where the consideration of multiple items of business together under clause 13.1 involves a variation to the order of business for the meeting, the council or committee must resolve to alter the order of business in accordance with clause 8.3.

13.5       A motion to adopt multiple items of business together under clause 13.1 must identify each of the items of business to be adopted and state that they are to be adopted as recommended in the business paper.

13.6       Items of business adopted under clause 13.1 are to be taken to have been adopted unanimously.

13.7       Councillors must ensure that they declare and manage any conflicts of interest they may have in relation to items of business considered together under clause 13.1 in accordance with the requirements of the council’s code of conduct.


14.     Closure of Council Meetings to the Public

Grounds on Which Meetings Can be Closed to the Public

14.1       The council or a committee of the council may close to the public so much of its meeting as comprises the discussion or the receipt of any of the following types of matters:

(a)     personnel matters concerning particular individuals (other than councillors),

(b)     the personal hardship of any resident or ratepayer,

(c)     information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business,

(d)     commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed:

(i)      prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it, or

(ii)      confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the council, or

(iii)     reveal a trade secret,

(e)     information that would, if disclosed, prejudice the maintenance of law,

(f)      matters affecting the security of the council, councillors, council staff or council property,

(g)     advice concerning litigation, or advice that would otherwise be privileged from production in legal proceedings on the ground of legal professional privilege,

(h)     information concerning the nature and location of a place or an item of Aboriginal significance on community land,

(i)      alleged contraventions of the council’s code of conduct.

Note:   Clause 14.1 reflects section 10A(1) and (2) of the Act.

14.2       The grounds on which a meeting is closed to the public must be specified in the decision to close the meeting and recorded in the minutes of the meeting. 

14.3       The council or a committee of the council may also close to the public so much of its meeting as comprises a motion to close another part of the meeting to the public.

Note:   Clause 14.3 reflects section 10A(3) of the Act.


Matters to be Considered When Closing Meetings to the Public

14.4       A meeting is not to remain closed during the discussion of anything referred to in clause 14.1:

(a)     except for so much of the discussion as is necessary to preserve the relevant confidentiality, privilege or security, and

(b)     if the matter concerned is a matter other than a personnel matter concerning particular individuals, the personal hardship of a resident or ratepayer or a trade secret – unless the council or committee concerned is satisfied that discussion of the matter in an open meeting would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest.

Note:   Clause 14.4 reflects section 10B(1) of the Act.

14.5       A meeting is not to be closed during the receipt and consideration of information or advice referred to in clause 14.1(g) unless the advice concerns legal matters that:

(a)     are substantial issues relating to a matter in which the council or committee is involved, and

(b)     are clearly identified in the advice, and

(c)     are fully discussed in that advice.

Note:   Clause 14.5 reflects section 10B(2)of the Act.

14.6       If a meeting is closed during the discussion of a motion to close another part of the meeting to the public (as referred to in clause 14.3), the consideration of the motion must not include any consideration of the matter or information to be discussed in that other part of the meeting other than consideration of whether the matter concerned is a matter referred to in clause 14.1.

Note:   Clause 14.6 reflects section 10B(3) of the Act.

14.7       For the purpose of determining whether the discussion of a matter in an open meeting would be contrary to the public interest, it is irrelevant that:

(a)     a person may misinterpret or misunderstand the discussion, or

(b)     the discussion of the matter may:

(i)         cause embarrassment to the council or committee concerned, or to councillors or to employees of the council, or

(ii)        cause a loss of confidence in the council or committee.

Note: Clause 14.7 reflects section 10B(4) of the Act.

14.8       In deciding whether part of a meeting is to be closed to the public, the council or committee concerned must consider any relevant guidelines issued by the Departmental Chief Executive of the Office of Local Government. [corresponds to 14.7 in new Model Meeting Code]

Note:   Clause 14.8 reflects section 10B(5) of the Act.

Notice of Likelihood of Closure Not Required in Urgent Cases

14.9       Part of a meeting of the council, or of a committee of the council, may be closed to the public while the council or committee considers a matter that has not been identified in the agenda for the meeting under clause 3.23 as a matter that is likely to be considered when the meeting is closed, but only if:

(a)     it becomes apparent during the discussion of a particular matter that the matter is a matter referred to in clause 14.1, and

(b)     the council or committee, after considering any representations made under clause 14.10, resolves that further discussion of the matter:

(i)      should not be deferred (because of the urgency of the matter), and

(ii)      should take place in a part of the meeting that is closed to the public.

Note:   Clause 14.9 reflects section 10C of the Act.

Representations by Members of the Public

14.10     The council, or a committee of the council, may allow members of the public to make representations to or at a meeting, before any part of the meeting is closed to the public, as to whether that part of the meeting should be closed.

Note:   Clause 14.10 reflects section 10A(4) of the Act.

14.11     A representation under clause 14.10 is to be made after the motion to close the part of the meeting is moved and seconded.

14.12     Where the matter has been identified in the agenda of the meeting under clause 3.22 as a matter that is likely to be considered when the meeting is closed to the public, in order to make representations under clause 14.10, members of the public must first make an application to the council in the approved form. Applications must be received by 5pm on the date of the meeting at which the matter is to be considered.

14.13     The general manager (or their delegate) may refuse an application made under clause 14.12. The general manager or their delegate must give reasons in writing for a decision to refuse an application.

14.14     There shall be no limit to the number of speakers that may be permitted to make representations under clause 14.10.

14.15     If more than the permitted number of speakers apply to make representations under clause 14.10, the general manager or their delegate may request the speakers to nominate from among themselves the persons who are to make representations to the council. If the speakers are not able to agree on whom to nominate to make representations under clause 14.10, the general manager or their delegate is to determine who will make representations to the council.

14.16     The general manager (or their delegate) is to determine the order of speakers.

14.17     Where the council or a committee of the council proposes to close a meeting or part of a meeting to the public in circumstances where the matter has not been identified in the agenda for the meeting under clause 3.22 as a matter that is likely to be considered when the meeting is closed to the public, the chairperson is to invite representations from the public under clause 14.10 after the motion to close the part of the meeting is moved and seconded. There is no limit to the number of speakers the chairperson may permit to make representations in such order as determined by the chairperson.

14.18     Each speaker will be allowed three (3) minutes to make representations, and this time limit is to be strictly enforced by the chairperson. Speakers must confine their representations to whether the meeting should be closed to the public. If a speaker digresses to irrelevant matters, the chairperson is to direct the speaker not to do so. If a speaker fails to observe a direction from the chairperson, the speaker will not be further heard.

Expulsion of Non-Councillors From Meetings Closed to the Public

14.19     If a meeting or part of a meeting of the council or a committee of the council is closed to the public in accordance with section 10A of the Act and this code, any person who is not a councillor and who fails to leave the meeting when requested, may be expelled from the meeting as provided by section 10(2)(a) or (b) of the Act.

14.20     If any such person, after being notified of a resolution or direction expelling them from the meeting, fails to leave the place where the meeting is being held, a police officer, or any person authorised for the purpose by the council or person presiding, may, by using only such force as is necessary, remove the firstmentioned person from that place and, if necessary restrain that person from reentering that place for the remainder of the meeting.

 

[new in Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

Obligations of Councillors Attending Meetings by Audio-Visual Link

[corresponds to 14.20 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

14.21     Councillors attending a meeting by audio-visual link must ensure that no other person is within sight or hearing of the meeting at any time that the meeting is closed to the public under section 10A of the Act.        

Information to be Disclosed in Resolutions Closing Meetings to the Public

14.212   The grounds on which part of a meeting is closed must be stated in the decision to close that part of the meeting and must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting. The grounds must specify the following:

(a)     the relevant provision of section 10A(2) of the Act,

(b)     the matter that is to be discussed during the closed part of the meeting,

(c)     the reasons why the part of the meeting is being closed, including (if the matter concerned is a matter other than a personnel matter concerning particular individuals, the personal hardship of a resident or ratepayer or a trade secret) an explanation of the way in which discussion of the matter in an open meeting would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.

Note:   Clause 14.212 reflects section 10D of the Act.

Resolutions Passed at Closed Meetings to be Made Public

14.223   If the council passes a resolution during a meeting, or a part of a meeting, that is closed to the public, the chairperson must make the resolution public as soon as practicable after the meeting, or the relevant part of the meeting, has ended, and the resolution must be recorded in the publicly available minutes of the meeting.

14.234   Resolutions passed during a meeting, or a part of a meeting, that is closed to the public must be made public by the chairperson under clause 14.223 during a part of the meeting that is webcast.

15.    Keeping Order at Meetings

Points of Order

15.1       A councillor may draw the attention of the chairperson to an alleged breach of this code by raising a point of order. A point of order does not require a seconder.

15.2       A point of order cannot be made with respect to adherence to the principles contained in clause 2.1.

15.3       A point of order must be taken immediately it is raised. The chairperson must suspend the business before the meeting and permit the councillor raising the point of order to state the provision of this code they believe has been breached. The chairperson must then rule on the point of order – either by upholding it or by overruling it.

Questions of Order

15.4       The chairperson, without the intervention of any other councillor, may call any councillor to order whenever, in the opinion of the chairperson, it is necessary to do so.

15.5       A councillor who claims that another councillor has committed an act of disorder, or is out of order, may call the attention of the chairperson to the matter.

15.6       The chairperson must rule on a question of order immediately after it is raised but, before doing so, may invite the opinion of the council.

15.7       The chairperson’s ruling must be obeyed unless a motion dissenting from the ruling is passed.

Motions of Dissent

15.8       A councillor can, without notice, move to dissent from a ruling of the chairperson on a point of order or a question of order. If that happens, the chairperson must suspend the business before the meeting until a decision is made on the motion of dissent.

15.9       If a motion of dissent is passed, the chairperson must proceed with the suspended business as though the ruling dissented from had not been given. If, as a result of the ruling, any motion or business has been rejected as out of order, the chairperson must restore the motion or business to the agenda and proceed with it in due course.

15.10     Despite any other provision of this code, only the mover of a motion of dissent and the chairperson can speak to the motion before it is put. The mover of the motion does not have a right of general reply.

Acts of Disorder

15.11     A councillor commits an act of disorder if the councillor, at a meeting of the council or a committee of the council:

(a)     contravenes the Act or any the r Regulation in force under the Act or this code, or [in new Model Meeting Code]

(b)     assaults or threatens to assault another councillor or person present at the meeting, or

(c)     moves or attempts to move a motion or an amendment that has an unlawful purpose or that deals with a matter that is outside the jurisdiction of the council or the committee, or addresses or attempts to address the council or the committee on such a motion, amendment or matter, or

(d)     insults or makes personal reflections unfavourable personal remarks about, on or makes personal reflections on or imputes improper motives to any other council official, or alleges a breach of the council’s code of conduct, or [in new Model Meeting Code]

(e)     says or does anything that is inconsistent with maintaining order at the meeting or is likely to bring the council or the committee into disrepute.

Note: Clause 15.11 reflects section 182 of the Regulation. [in new Model Meeting Code]

15.12     The chairperson may require a councillor:

(a)     to apologise without reservation for an act of disorder referred to in clauses 15.11(a), or (b), or (e), or [in new Model Meeting Code]

(b)     to withdraw a motion or an amendment referred to in clause 15.11(c) and, where appropriate, to apologise without reservation, or

(c)     to retract and apologise without reservation for any statement that constitutes an act of disorder referred to in clauses 15.11(d) and (e). [in new Model Meeting Code]

Note: Clause 15.12 reflects section 233 of the Regulation. [in new Model Meeting Code]

How Disorder at a Meeting May be Dealt With

15.13     If disorder occurs at a meeting of the council, the chairperson may adjourn the meeting for a period of not more than fifteen (15) minutes and leave the chair. The council, on reassembling, must, on a question put from the chairperson, decide without debate whether the business is to be proceeded with or not. This clause applies to disorder arising from the conduct of members of the public as well as disorder arising from the conduct of councillors.

Expulsion from Meetings

15.14     All chairpersons of meetings of the council and committees of the council are authorised under this code to expel any person other than a councillor, from a council or committee meeting, for the purposes of section 10(2)(b) of the Act. Councillors may only be expelled by resolution of the council or the committee of the council.

15.15     Clause 15.14, does not limit the ability of the council or a committee of the council to resolve to expel a person, including a councillor, from a council or committee meeting, under section 10(2) (a) of the Act.

15.16     A councillor may, as provided by section 10(2)(a) or (b) of the Act, be expelled from a meeting of the council for having failed to comply with a requirement under clause 15.12. The expulsion of a councillor from the meeting for that reason does not prevent any other action from being taken against the councillor for the act of disorder concerned.

15.17     A member of the public may, as provided by section 10(2)(a) or (b) of the Act, be expelled from a meeting of the council for engaging in or having engaged in disorderly conduct at the meeting.

15.18     Where a councillor or a member of the public is expelled from a meeting, the expulsion and the name of the person expelled, if known, are to be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.

15.19     If a councillor or a member of the public fails to leave the place where a meeting of the council is being held immediately after they have been expelled, a police officer, or any person authorised for the purpose by the council or person presiding, may, by using only such force as is necessary, remove the councillor or member of the public from that place and, if necessary, restrain the councillor or member of the public from re-entering that place for the remainder of the meeting.

[new in Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provisions]

How Disorder by Councillors Attending Meetings by Audio-Visual Link may be Dealt With

 

[corresponds to 15.21 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

 

15.20   Where a councillor is attending a meeting by audio-visual link, the chairperson or a person authorised by the chairperson may mute the councillor’s audio link to the meeting for the purposes of enforcing compliance with this code.

 

 

 

            [corresponds to 15.22 in new Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

 

15.21   If a councillor attending a meeting by audio-visual link is expelled from a meeting for an act of disorder, the chairperson of the meeting or a person authorised by the chairperson, may terminate the councillor’s audio-visual link to the meeting.

Use of Mobile Phones and the Unauthorised Recording of Meetings

15.202   Councillors, council staff and members of the public must ensure that mobile phones are turned to silent during meetings of the council and committees of the council.

15.213   A person must not live stream or use an audio recorder, video camera, mobile phone or any other device to make a recording of the proceedings of a meeting of the council or a committee of the council without the prior authorisation of the council or the committee.

15.224   Without limiting clause 15.17, a contravention of clause 15.23 or an attempt to contravene that clause, constitutes disorderly conduct for the purposes of clause 15.17. Any person who contravenes or attempts to contravene clause 15.213, may be expelled from the meeting as provided for under section 10(2) of the Act. [corresponds to 15.25 in new Model Meeting Code]

15.235   If any such person, after being notified of a resolution or direction expelling them from the meeting, fails to leave the place where the meeting is being held, a police officer, or any person authorised for the purpose by the council or person presiding, may, by using only such force as is necessary, remove the first-mentioned person from that place and, if necessary, restrain that person from re-entering that place for the remainder of the meeting.

16.    Conflicts of Interest

16.1       All councillors and, where applicable, all other persons, must declare and manage any conflicts of interest they may have in matters being considered at meetings of the council and committees of the council in accordance with the council’s code of conduct. All declarations of conflicts of interest and how the conflict of interest was managed by the person who made the declaration must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting at which the declaration was made.

 

[New in Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

16.2       Councillors attending a meeting by audio-visual link must declare and manage any conflicts of interest they may have in matters being considered at the meeting in accordance with the council’s code of conduct. Where a councillor has declared a pecuniary or significant non-pecuniary conflict of interest in a matter being discussed at the meeting, the councillor’s audio-visual link to the meeting must be suspended or terminated and the councillor must not be in sight or hearing of the meeting at any time during which the matter is being considered or discussed by the council or committee, or at any time during which the council or committee is voting on the matter.

17.    Decision of the Council

Council Decisions

17.1       A decision supported by a majority of the votes at a meeting of the council at which a quorum is present is a decision of the council.

Note:  Clause 17.1 reflects section 371 of the Act.

17.2       Decisions made by the council must be accurately recorded in the minutes of the meeting at which the decision is made.

Rescinding or Altering Council Decisions

17.3       A resolution passed by the council may not be altered or rescinded except by a motion to that effect of which notice has been given under clause 3.10.

Note:   Clause 17.3 reflects section 372(1) of the Act.

17.4       If a notice of motion to rescind a resolution is given at the meeting at which the resolution is carried, the resolution must not be carried into effect until the motion of rescission has been dealt with.

Note:   Clause 17.4 reflects section 372(2) of the Act.

17.5       If a motion has been lost, a motion having the same effect must not be considered unless notice of it has been duly given in accordance with clause 3.10.

Note:   Clause 17.5 reflects section 372(3) of the Act.

17.6       A notice of motion to alter or rescind a resolution, and a notice of motion which has the same effect as a motion which has been lost, must be signed by three (3) councillors if less than three (3) months has elapsed since the resolution was passed, or the motion was lost.

Note:   Clause 17.6 reflects section 372(4) of the Act.

17.7       If a motion to alter or rescind a resolution has been lost, or if a motion which has the same effect as a previously lost motion is lost, no similar motion may be brought forward within three (3) months of the meeting at which it was lost. This clause may not be evaded by substituting a motion differently worded, but in principle the same.

Note:   Clause 17.7 reflects section 372(5) of the Act.

17.8       The provisions of clauses 17.5–17.7 concerning lost motions do not apply to motions of adjournment.

Note:   Clause 17.8 reflects section 372(7) of the Act.

17.9       Discussion shall not be permitted upon any motion for adjournment of the Council.  If upon the question being put on any such motion the same is negatived, the subject then under consideration, or next on the business paper, shall be discussed; and it shall not be competent for any member again to move a motion for adjournment of the Council until half an hour again has elapsed from the time of moving the one that has been negatived.

17.10     A notice of motion submitted in accordance with clause 17.6 may only be withdrawn under clause 3.12 with the consent of all signatories to the notice of motion.

17.11     A motion to alter or rescind a resolution of the council may be moved on the report of a committee of the council and any such report must be recorded in the minutes of the meeting of the council.

Note:   Clause 17.11 reflects section 372(6) of the Act.

17.12     Subject to clause 17.7, in cases of urgency, a motion to alter or rescind a resolution of the council may be moved at the same meeting at which the resolution was adopted, where:

(a)     a notice of motion signed by three (3) councillors is submitted to the chairperson, and

(b)     a motion to have the motion considered at the meeting is passed, and

(c)     the chairperson rules the business that is the subject of the motion is of great urgency on the grounds that it requires a decision by the council before the next scheduled ordinary meeting of the council.

17.13     A motion moved under clause 17.12(b) can be moved without notice. Despite clauses 10.21–10.32, only the mover of a motion referred to in clause 17.12(b) can speak to the motion before it is put.

17.14     A motion of dissent cannot be moved against a ruling by the chairperson under clause 17.12(c).

Recommitting Resolutions to Correct an Error

17.15     Despite the provisions of this Part, a councillor may, with the leave of the chairperson, move to recommit a resolution adopted at the same meeting:

(a)   to correct any error, ambiguity or imprecision in the council’s resolution, or

(b)   to confirm the voting on the resolution.

17.16     In seeking the leave of the chairperson to move to recommit a resolution for the purposes of clause 17.15(a), the councillor is to propose alternative wording for the resolution.

17.17     The chairperson must not grant leave to recommit a resolution for the purposes of clause 17.15(a), unless they are satisfied that the proposed alternative wording of the resolution would not alter the substance of the resolution previously adopted at the meeting.

17.18     A motion moved under clause 17.15 can be moved without notice. Despite clauses 10.21–10.32, only the mover of a motion referred to in clause 17.15 can speak to the motion before it is put.

17.19     A motion of dissent cannot be moved against a ruling by the chairperson under clause 17.15.

17.20     A motion moved under clause 17.15 with the leave of the chairperson cannot be voted on unless or until it has been seconded.

18.     Time Limits on Council Meetings

18.1       Meetings of the council and committees of the council are to conclude no later than 12 midnight unless upon a motion to which there is no dissent [Pol].

18.2       If the business of the meeting is unfinished at 11:00pm, the council or the committee may, by resolution, extend the time of the meeting.

18.3       A motion to extend the time of any meeting beyond the time of 11:00pm shall be effective unless there is dissent from at least three (3) Councillors.

18.4       If the business of the meeting is unfinished at 11:00pm, and the council does not resolve to extend the meeting, the chairperson must either:

(a)     defer consideration of the remaining items of business on the agenda to the next ordinary meeting of the council, or

(b)     adjourn the meeting to a time, date and place fixed by the chairperson.

18.5       Clause 18.4 does not limit the ability of the council or a committee of the council to resolve to adjourn a meeting at any time. The resolution adjourning the meeting must fix the time, date and place that the meeting is to be adjourned to.

18.6       Where a meeting is adjourned under clause 18.4 or 18.5, the general manager must:

(a)     individually notify each councillor of the time, date and place at which the meeting will reconvene, and

(b)     publish the time, date and place at which the meeting will reconvene on the council’s website and in such other manner that the general manager is satisfied is likely to bring notice of the time, date and place of the reconvened meeting to the attention of as many people as possible.

19.    After the Meeting

Minutes of Meetings

19.1       The council is to keep full and accurate minutes of the proceedings of meetings of the council.

Note:   Clause 19.1 reflects section 375(1) of the Act.

19.2       At a minimum, the general manager must ensure that the following matters are recorded in the council’s minutes:

              [new in Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

              (a)     the names of councillors attending a council meeting and whether they attended the meeting in person or by audio-visual link, [non-mandatory provision]

(ab)   details of each motion moved at a council meeting and of any amendments moved to it,

(bc)   the names of the mover and seconder of the motion or amendment,

(cd)   whether the motion or amendment was passed or lost,

(de)   such other matters specifically required under this code, and

(ef)    the council officers who were present at the meeting

19.3       The minutes of a council meeting must be confirmed at a subsequent meeting of the council.

Note:   Clause 19.3 reflects section 375(2) of the Act.

19.4       Any debate on the confirmation of the minutes is to be confined to whether the minutes are a full and accurate record of the meeting they relate to.

19.5       When the minutes have been confirmed, they are to be signed by the person presiding at the subsequent meeting.

Note:   Clause 19.5 reflects section 375(2) of the Act.

19.6       The confirmed minutes of a meeting may be amended to correct typographical or administrative errors after they have been confirmed. Any amendment made under this clause must not alter the substance of any decision made at the meeting.

19.7       The confirmed minutes of a council meeting must be published on the council’s website. This clause does not prevent the council from also publishing unconfirmed minutes of its meetings on its website prior to their confirmation.

Access to Correspondence and Reports Laid on the Table at, or Submitted to, a Meeting

19.8       The council and committees of the council must, during or at the close of a meeting, or during the business day following the meeting, give reasonable access to any person to inspect correspondence and reports laid on the table at, or submitted to, the meeting.

Note:  Clause 19.8 reflects section 11(1) of the Act.

19.9       Clause 19.8 does not apply if the correspondence or reports relate to a matter that was received or discussed or laid on the table at, or submitted to, the meeting when the meeting was closed to the public.

Note:   Clause 19.9 reflects section 11(2) of the Act.

19.10     Clause 19.8 does not apply if the council or the committee resolves at the meeting, when open to the public, that the correspondence or reports are to be treated as confidential because they relate to a matter specified in section 10A(2) of the Act.

Note:   Clause 19.10 reflects section 11(3) of the Act.

19.11     Correspondence or reports to which clauses 19.9 and 19.10 apply are to be marked with the relevant provision of section 10A(2) of the Act that applies to the correspondence or report.

Implementation of Decisions of the Council

19.12     The general manager is to implement, without undue delay, lawful decisions of the council.

Note:   Clause 19.12 reflects section 335(b) of the Act.

20.    Council Committee

Application of This Part

20.1       This Part only applies to committees of the council whose members are all councillors.

Council Committees Whose Members are All Councillors

20.2       The council may, by resolution, establish such committees as it considers necessary.

20.3       A committee of the council is to consist of the mayor and such other councillors as are elected by the councillors or appointed by the council.

20.4       The quorum for a meeting of a committee of the council is to be:

(a)     such number of members as the council decides, or

(b)     if the council has not decided a number – a majority of the members of the committee.

Functions of Committees

20.5       The council must specify the functions of each of its committees when the committee is established, but may from time to time amend those functions.

Notice of Committee Meetings

20.6       The general manager must send to each councillor, regardless of whether they are a committee member, at least three (3) days before each meeting of the committee, a notice specifying:

(a)     the time, date and place of the meeting, and

(b)     the business proposed to be considered at the meeting.

20.7       Notice of less than three (3) days may be given of a committee meeting called in an emergency.

Attendance at Committee Meetings

20.8       A committee member (other than the mayor) ceases to be a member of a committee if the committee member:

(a)   has been absent from three (3) consecutive meetings of the committee without having given reasons acceptable to the committee for the member’s absences, or

(b)   has been absent from at least half of the meetings of the committee held during the immediately preceding year without having given to the committee acceptable reasons for the member’s absences.

20.9       Clause 20.8 does not apply if all of the members of the council are members of the committee.

Non-Members Entitled to Attend Committee Meetings

20.10     A councillor who is not a member of a committee of the council is entitled to attend, and to speak at a meeting of the committee. However, the councillor is not entitled:

(a)     to give notice of business for inclusion in the agenda for the meeting, or

(b)     to move or second a motion at the meeting, or

(c)     to vote at the meeting.

Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson of Council Committees

20.11     The chairperson of each committee of the council must be:

(a)     the mayor, or

(b)     if the mayor does not wish to be the chairperson of a committee, a member of the committee elected by the council, or

(c)     if the council does not elect such a member, a member of the committee elected by the committee.

20.12     The council may elect a member of a committee of the council as deputy chairperson of the committee. If the council does not elect a deputy chairperson of such a committee, the committee may elect a deputy chairperson.

20.13     If neither the chairperson nor the deputy chairperson of a committee of the council is able or willing to preside at a meeting of the committee, the committee must elect a member of the committee to be acting chairperson of the committee.

20.14     The chairperson is to preside at a meeting of a committee of the council. If the chairperson is unable or unwilling to preside, the deputy chairperson (if any) is to preside at the meeting, but if neither the chairperson nor the deputy chairperson is able or willing to preside, the acting chairperson is to preside at the meeting.

Procedure in Committee Meetings

20.15     Subject to any specific requirements of this code, each committee of the council may regulate its own procedure. The provisions of this code are to be taken to apply to all committees of the council unless the council or the committee determines otherwise in accordance with this clause.

20.16     Whenever the voting on a motion put to a meeting of the committee is equal, the chairperson of the committee is to have a casting vote as well as an original vote unless the council or the committee determines otherwise in accordance with clause 20.15.

20.17     Voting at a council committee meeting is to be by open means (such as on the voices, by show of hands or by a visible electronic voting system). 

Closure of Committee Meetings to the Public

20.19     The provisions of the Act and Part 14 of this code apply to the closure of meetings of committees of the council to the public in the same way they apply to the closure of meetings of the council to the public.

20.20     If a committee of the council passes a resolution, or makes a recommendation, during a meeting, or a part of a meeting that is closed to the public, the chairperson must make the resolution or recommendation public as soon as practicable after the meeting or part of the meeting has ended, and report the resolution or recommendation to the next meeting of the council. The resolution or recommendation must also be recorded in the publicly available minutes of the meeting.

20.21     Resolutions passed during a meeting, or a part of a meeting that is closed to the public must be made public by the chairperson under clause 20.20 during a part of the meeting that is webcast.

Disorder in Committee Meetings

20.22     The provisions of the Act and this code relating to the maintenance of order in council meetings apply to meetings of committees of the council in the same way as they apply to meetings of the council.

Minutes of Council Committee Meetings

20.23     Each committee of the council is to keep full and accurate minutes of the proceedings of its meetings. At a minimum, a committee must ensure that the following matters are recorded in the committee’s minutes:

             

              [new in Model Meeting Code – non-mandatory provision]

              (a)   the names of councillors attending a meeting and whether they attended the meeting in person or by audio-visual link, [non-mandatory provision]

(ab)   details of each motion moved at a meeting and of any amendments moved to it,

(bc)    the names of the mover and seconder of the motion or amendment,

(cd)    whether the motion or amendment was passed or lost, and

(de)   such other matters specifically required under this code.

20.24     All voting at meetings of committees of the council (including meetings that are closed to the public), must be recorded in the minutes of meetings with the names of councillors who voted for and against each motion or amendment, (including the use of the casting vote), being recorded.

20.25     The minutes of meetings of each committee of the council must be confirmed at a subsequent meeting of the committee.

20.26     Any debate on the confirmation of the minutes is to be confined to whether the minutes are a full and accurate record of the meeting they relate to.

20.27     When the minutes have been confirmed, they are to be signed by the person presiding at that subsequent meeting.

20.28     The confirmed minutes of a meeting may be amended to correct typographical or administrative errors after they have been confirmed. Any amendment made under this clause must not alter the substance of any decision made at the meeting.

20.29     The confirmed minutes of a meeting of a committee of the council must be published on the council’s website. This clause does not prevent the council from also publishing unconfirmed minutes of meetings of committees of the council on its website prior to their confirmation.

21.    Irregularities

21.1     Proceedings at a meeting of a council or a council committee are not invalidated because of:

(a)        a vacancy in a civic office, or

(b)        a failure to give notice of the meeting to any councillor or committee member, or

(c)        any defect in the election or appointment of a councillor or committee member, or

(d)        a failure of a councillor or a committee member to declare a conflict of interest, or to refrain from the consideration or discussion of, or vote on, the relevant matter, at a council or committee meeting in accordance with the council’s code of conduct, or

(e)        a failure to comply with this code.

Note:   Clause 21.1 reflects section 374 of the Act.

22.    Definitions

the Act                                                 means the Local Government Act 1993

act of disorder                                    means an act of disorder as defined in clause 15.11 of this code

amendment                                         In relation to an original motion, means a motion moving an amendment to that motion

audio recorder                                    any device capable of recording speech

audio visual link                                 means a facility that enables audio and visual communication between persons at different places [new in Model Meeting Code]

business day                                       means any day except Saturday or Sunday or any other day the whole or part of which is observed as a public holiday throughout New South Wales

Chairperson                                        in relation to a meeting of the council – means the person presiding at the meeting as provided by section 369 of the Act and clauses 6.1 and 6.2 of this code, and in relation to a meeting of a committee – means the person presiding at the meeting as provided by clause 20.11 of this code

clause                                                  means a clause in this Code of Meeting Practice

this code                                              means the council’s adopted code of meeting practice

committee of the council                   means a committee established by the council in accordance with clause 20.2 of this code (being a committee consisting only of councillors) or the council when it has resolved itself into committee of the whole under clause 12.1

council official                                    has the same meaning it has in the Model Code of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW day            means calendar day

division                                                means a request by two councillors under clause 11.7 of this code requiring the recording of the names of the councillors who voted both for and against a motion

foreshadowed amendment               means a proposed amendment foreshadowed by a councillor under clause 10.19 of this code during debate on the first amendment

foreshadowed motion                        means a motion foreshadowed by a councillor under clause 10.18 of this code during debate on an original motion

open voting                                         means voting on the voices or by a show of hands or by a visible electronic voting system or similar means


planning decision                               means a decision made in the exercise of a function of a council under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 including any decision relating to a development application, an environmental planning instrument, a development control plan or a development contribution plan under that Act, but not including the making of an order under Division 9.3 of Part 9 of that Act

a policy or [Pol]                                  means a policy adopted by Lane Cove Council.

performance improvement order     means an order issued under section 438A of the Act

quorum                                                means the minimum number of councillors or committee members necessary to conduct a meeting

the Regulation                                    means the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 2021 [new in Model Meeting Code]

webcast                                               a video or audio broadcast of a meeting transmitted across the internet either concurrently with the meeting or at a later time

year                                                      means the period beginning 1 July and ending the following 30 June


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Village Public Art program - Birdwood Avenue - Commonwealth Bank building

 

 

Subject:          Village Public Art program - Birdwood Avenue - Commonwealth Bank building    

Record No:    SU2509 - 8242/22

Division:         Human Services Division

Author(s):      Bianca Couchman; Corinne Hitchenson 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

In September 2020, Council received a report on proposed public art projects in Birdwood Lane as part of a Village Public Art program. This Report updates Council on the most recent completed work on the rear of the Commonwealth Bank building in Birdwood Lane. The Report also complies with the requirement of the Local Government Act 1993 – Section 67 regarding works carried out by Council on private land. It is recommended the report be received and noted.

 

Background

 

As per the September 2020 Report, property owners backing onto Birdwood Lane were approached to ascertain their interest in being part of the Village Public Art program which aimed to ‘brighten up’ some of the blank walls facing Birdwood Lane.  Expressions of Interest from artists were also sought as part of the project’s efforts to enliven the local streetscape following the opening of The Canopy.

 

Two property owners initially expressed interest to be included in the program. As a result the rear of the Lane Cove Newsagency was adorned in public art earlier in 2021 while this report relates to the second, and most recently completed, artwork on the rear of the Commonwealth Bank building. 

 

Council had resolved that works through this program would be completed under Section 67 of the Local Government Act at no cost to the property owners. Section 67 then requires a Report back to Council in compliance with subsection 2(b) of that section – this requirement is detailed in this Report. The most recently completed work will also need to be reported in Council’s Annual report.

 

There has also been interest expressed by two other building owners and lessees.  Council will consider expanding the Village Public Art program when funding (and COVID restrictions) make this feasible.

 

Discussion

 

The information needed to comply with Section 67 is listed below:

Information required

Answer

 

 

1.   Person for whom the work was carried out

Elizabeth Bay Nominees Pty Limited

2.   The Nature of the Work

Creation of a public artwork by artist Katherine Gailer including artwork conception and delivery. Final artwork is 18.5m in length and 5m in height. The wall was cleaned and primed prior to artwork application and sealed with a sacrificial graffiti proof coating. All necessary safety requirements were adhered to for delivery including the contracting of traffic control for the development of a Traffic Control Plan and traffic controllers during periods of artwork application.

3.   The type and quantity of materials used

Wall preparation – Dulux Colourbond paint in Shale Grey             

Artwork – Dulux Weathershield and Taubmans Sunproof Exterior paints, various colours

 

4.   The charge made for those materials

Wall preparation  - $5,950

Artists Fees  -      $21,800

Graffiti proofing -    $1043

Decal Printing -     $130

5.   The total number of hours taken by each person who carried out the work

 

Hours spent on site at Commonwealth Bank

Wall preparation Supervisor  – 8 hours

Wall preparation Painter 1 – 10 hours

Wall preparation Painter 2 – 10 hours

Wall preparation Painter 3 -  8 hours

Artist – 55 hours

Artist Assistant 1 – 55 hours

Graffiti proofer – 5.5 hours

 

6.   The total amount charged for carrying out the work (including the charge made for the materials.

No charge was levied on the property owner for the public artwork. Council assisted in the organisation of repair works to the wall surface, which the property owner paid in accordance with contractual requirements.

7.   The reason for carrying out the work

The work was carried out as part of a Village Public Art program to enhance the look of the Village and in particular the area adjacent to The Canopy

 

The Commonwealth Bank work has now been successfully completed and promoted to the community.  Photographs of the completed work are attached. 

 

Conclusion

 

The total cost of the project was $28,923 excluding GST.  As per Council’s resolution of September 2020 there was no charge levied to the business owner for the public artwork. Positive feedback has been received for the Village Public Art program as a whole as well as for this specific artwork.

Further works are envisaged based on the program’s success with budget considerations being made for the 2022/23 financial year.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receive and note the Report.

 

Jane Gornall

Executive Manager - Human Services

Human Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Lane Cove Village Art Project - before the works

1 Page

 

AT‑2 View

Newsagency being primed before painting

1 Page

 

AT‑3 View

Newsagency with work by artist Kim Siew

1 Page

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

Lane Cove Village Art Project - before the works

 

                                   


ATTACHMENT 2

Newsagency being primed before painting

 

                                            

                                          


ATTACHMENT 3

Newsagency with work by artist Kim Siew

 

                                             


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Ministerial Order - Planning Expectations

 

 

Subject:          Ministerial Order - Planning Expectations    

Record No:    SU3486 - 4363/22

Division:         Environmental Services Division

Author(s):      Terry Tredrea; Christopher Pelcz 

 

 

Executive Summary

                                                              

The purpose of this Report is to notify Councillors about the recent Ministerial Order. On 26 November 2021, then Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, Rob Stokes released a Statement of Expectations Order (AT-1) which reserved the right for the Minister to intervene where councils are not upholding their “responsibilities”. This Order stands regardless of who is the Minister of the day.

 

The focus of these expected “responsibilities” is on improvements to development assessment,

planning proposals and strategic planning. The Minister called for the Order to be reported to Council. It is recommended the report be received and noted.

 

Background

 

On 26 November 2021, the then Minster for Planning and Public Spaces made a Ministerial Order under Section 9.6(9) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

 

The Section relates to the Appointment of planning administrator, and states that:

 

The Minister may appoint a planning administrator, or confer functions on a regional panel under this section, provided heads of consideration for the exercise of power under subsection (1)(b), and has taken any of those heads of consideration that are relevant into account.

 

The heads of consideration set benchmarks for council performance in the areas of:-

 

1.   Development Assessment;

2.   Planning Proposals; and

3.   Strategic Planning.

 

Discussion

 

By way of rationale for the Order, the Secretary of DPE explains in the accompanying letter that:

 

Slow decision-making, whether by Government agencies or a council, is the enemy of public confidence in the planning system and leads to bad economic, social and environmental outcomes. The work that we have all done over the last two years has put the planning system in good stead and has allowed for new performance indicators to be set.

 

The performance indicators outlined in the Minister’s Order should not be seen as aspirational but as achievable and critical to the effective functioning of the planning system.

 

The Secretary continues, that the Minister has decided to outline his clear expectations for the planning system in the attached Order,

 

so that incoming councillors are aware of the importance of an efficient and effective planning system in supporting a strong economy and delivering better places. It is also important to note that for the first time incoming councillors will be provided an induction on the planning and their role in ensuring the planning system as efficiently as possible.

 

Heads of consideration

 

When determining whether or not to appoint an administrator, the Minister will consider the following matters:

 

·    Whether or not the Council has failed to meet the Minister’s expectations in relation to its performance,

·    The frequency and degree to which the Council has performed (or failed to) in accordance with Ministerial expectations,

·    The range and type of planning and development matters in relation to which the Council has performed (or failed to) in accordance with Ministerial expectations,

·    Whether or not an administrator should be appointed in relation to one or all particular classes of planning and development matters,

·    The effect of any caretaker period preventing a Council’s performance in dealing with the planning and development matters set out in the Ministerial expectations, and

·    The public interest.

 

Ministerial Expectations

 

The attached Order details Ministerial expectations of meeting specific, prescriptive benchmarks under the headings:

 

1.   Development Assessment

 

·    prepare assessment reports for significant development to relevant Panels no longer than 250 days from lodgement,

·    determine a development application (DA) as soon as practical and no longer than 180 days from lodgement,

·    report a DA to the Local Planning Panel for determination within 4 weeks of a request from the Panel chair.

 

2.   Planning Proposals

 

·    Council must make a decision on whether to support (or not) a Planning Proposal as soon as practical and no longer than 90 days,

·    After Council’s decision, submit a proponent led Planning Proposal for a Gateway Determination as soon as practical and no longer than 90 days,

·    Publicly exhibit a Planning Proposal in line with the conditions of the Gateway Determination,

·    Consider and/or respond to submissions,

·    Make the final Local Environmental Plan amendment (which Council has delegation for) in the timeframes specified in the Gateway Determination.

 

3.   Strategic Planning

 

·    Council should prepare a Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS) in accordance with the NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979,

·    Undertake the required review of the LSPS (five years from adoption),

·    Give effect to (i.e. implement) the Regional and District Plans that apply to Lane Cove,

·    Give effect to (i.e. implement) adopted local planning strategies (i.e. Local Housing Strategy) and any approval requirements issued by DPE,

·    Consider State Environmental Planning Policies or other strategies and policies of the Government, Minister or the Department concerning planning and development matters.

 

Conclusion

 

These benchmarks for the planning performance of all councils may be taken into consideration by the Minister in deciding whether or not to appoint an administrator to take over a council’s planning functions. For example, as they relate to:

 

·    How frequently a council has “failed to perform in accordance with the Minister’s expectations”; and

·    Whether an appointment be made for a particular or for “all planning and development matters dealt with by the council.

 

In general Lane Cove’s planning activities comply with the standards outlined. In terms of Development Assessment, Council’s current Median Processing time is 40 days, and has no applications greater than 250 days. Council has no Planning Proposals currently under assessment and is up to date with its Strategic Planning Obligation, with a program to complete the outstanding matters raised by the GSC in response t Council’s Housing Strategy. The risk to Council of the Minister appointing a Planning Administrator for the Lane Cove LGA is therefore currently low.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council receive and note the report.

 

Mark Brisby

Executive Manager

Environmental Services Division

 

Christopher Pelcz

Coordinator - Strategic Planning

Environmental Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Statement of Expectations

7 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

Statement of Expectations

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Electoral Funding Disclosure Requirements

 

 

Subject:          Electoral Funding Disclosure Requirements    

Record No:    SU7270 - 82031/21

Division:         Corporate Services Division

Author(s):      Stephen Golding 

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The purpose of this report is to advise Councillors that Council has received correspondence from the Election Funding Authority advising that Councillors are required to make twice yearly disclosures to the Election Funding Authority on political donations received and electoral funding incurred.

 

Discussion

 

Councillors would have received information from the NSW Electoral Commission that outlined the responsibility of as a Councillor to submit twice yearly declarations to the Election Funding Authority for political donations received and electoral funding incurred. 

 

Councillors are required to submit political donations and electoral expenditure disclosures to the NSW Electoral Commission during their term.

 

There are 3 types of disclosures to be submitted each year as a Councillor. Those being: two half-yearly disclosures of political donations made and received, and an annual disclosure of electoral expenditure incurred.

 

The relevant periods that each disclosure covers and the lodgement periods for disclosures for 2021/2022 are:

 

Disclosure type

Disclosure period

Disclosure lodgement period

Disclosure due

1st half-yearly political donations disclosure

1 July 2021 to 31 December 2021

1 January 2022 to 25 February 2022

25 February 2022

2nd half-yearly political donations disclosure

1 January 2022 to 30 June 2022

1 July 2022 to 28 July 2022

28 July 2022

Annual electoral expenditure disclosure

1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022

1 July 2022 to 22 September 2022

22 September 2022


I
If you, as an elected member, were the lead candidate of a group of candidates at the local government elections you must submit the above disclosures not only as a candidate and elected member, but also on behalf of the group.

f an elected member was the lead candidate of a group of candidates at the local

If no political donations are made or received or no electoral expenditure is incurred, ‘Nil’ disclosure forms must still be submitted.

 

There is a fact sheet on the NSW Electoral Commission that provides general information on the disclosures due 25 February 2022.

 

Disclosures can be made through Funding and Disclosure Online, the NSW Electoral Commission’s secure, accessible and convenient online portal for electoral participants.

Detailed information about disclosures is available on the NSW Electoral Commission website.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

 

Steven Kludass

Executive Manager - Corporate Services

Corporate Services Division

 

ATTACHMENTS:

There are no supporting documents for this report.


 

Ordinary Council Meeting 21 February 2022

Council Snapshot January 2022

 

 

Subject:          Council Snapshot January 2022    

Record No:    SU220 - 6304/22

Division:         General Managers Unit

Author(s):      Craig Wrightson 

 

 

Attached for the information of Councillors is a review of Council’s recent activities. This report provides a summary of the operations of each division from November 2021 to January 2022.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the report be received and noted.

 

 

Craig Wrightson

General Manager

General Managers Unit

 

ATTACHMENTS:

AT‑1 View

Council Snapshot January 2022

46 Pages

 

  


ATTACHMENT 1

Council Snapshot January 2022

 

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator

PDF Creator




[1] Waverley Council. (2021). Future proofing residential development for climate change. Retrieved from https://www.waverley.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/2432/FPRCC_Stage_1_Report.pdf