Agenda
Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Meeting
15 August 2023
Notice of Meeting
Dear Panel Members,
Notice is given of the Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Meeting, to be held in the Council Chambers on Tuesday 15 August 2023 commencing at 5pm. The business to be transacted at the meeting is included in this business paper.
Yours faithfully
Craig Wrightson
Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Meeting Procedures
The Lane Cove Local Planning Panel (LCLPP) meeting is chaired by The Hon David Lloyd QC or alternate Chairs. The meetings and other procedures of the Panel will be undertaken in accordance with the Lane Cove Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Charter and any guidelines issued by the General Manager.
The order of business is listed in the Agenda on the next page. That order will be followed unless the Panel resolves to modify the order at the meeting. This may occur for example where the members of the public in attendance are interested in specific items on the agenda.
Members of the public may address the Panel for a maximum of 3 minutes. All persons wishing to address the Panel must register prior to the meeting by contacting Council’s Office Manager – Environmental Services on 9911 3611. Where there are a large number of objectors with a common interest, the Panel may, in its absolute discretion, hear a representative of those persons.
Minutes of LCLPP meetings are published on Council’s website www.lanecove.nsw.gov.au as soon as possible following the meeting. If you have any enquiries or wish to obtain information in relation to LCLPP, please contact Council’s Office Manager – Environmental Services on 9911 3611.
Please note meetings held in the Council Chambers are Webcast. Webcasting allows the community to view proceedings from a computer without the need to attend the meeting. The webcast will include audio of members of the public that speak during the meeting. Please ensure while speaking to the Panel that you are respectful to other people and use appropriate language. Lane Cove Council accepts no liability for any defamatory or offensive remarks made during the course of these meetings.
The audio from these meetings is also recorded for the purposes of verifying the accuracy of the minutes and the recordings are not disclosed to any third party under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009, except as allowed under section 18(1) or section 19(1) of the PPIP Act, or where Council is compelled to do so by court order, warrant or subpoena or by any other legislation.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
APOLOGIES
NOTICE OF WEBCASTING OF MEETING
Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Reports
1. 47 Burns Bay Road Lane Cove.............................................. 4
2. 54 Kallaroo Road, Riverview............................................. 30
3. 40 Arabella Street, Longueville..................................... 46
4. 88 Carlotta Street, Greenwich........................................ 87
Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Meeting 15 August 2023
47 Burns Bay Road Lane Cove
Subject: 47 Burns Bay Road Lane Cove
Record No: DA23/85-01 - 46179/23
Division: Environmental Services Division
Author(s): Phillipa Frecklington
Property: |
47 Burns Bay Road, Lane Cove |
DA No: |
85/2023 |
Date Lodged: |
17/07/2023 |
Cost of Work: |
$150,000 |
Owner: |
Lane Cove Council |
Applicant: |
Ms Jane Gornall |
Description of the proposal to appear on determination |
Change of use to a community facility comprised of two (2) libraries and a Men’s Shed including construction of the Men’s Shed. |
Zone |
|
Is the proposal permissible within the zone |
Yes |
Is the property a heritage item |
No |
Is the property within a conservation area |
No |
Is the property adjacent to bushland |
No |
Stop the Clock used |
No |
Notification |
Neighbours Ward Councillors Progress Association |
REASON FOR REFERRAL
The Development Application is referred to the Lane Cove Local Planning Panel to determine on behalf of the Council as the land owner is the Council.
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Development Application seeks approval for the change of use from a pre-school to a community facility. The proposal includes use of the existing building, including minor fit-out works for the purpose of two (2) libraries and the construction of a community ‘Men’s Shed’ at the rear.
The Development Application has been assessed against the provisions of Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009, and Lane Cove Development Control Plan 2009 and is considered to be satisfactory, subject to conditions.
The proposal seeks to reduce the existing on-site parking provision to two spaces. Council’s Traffic Engineer has reviewed the application and determined that the provision of only one accessible space is suitable in the circumstances to allow for adequate turning space. A condition to this effect is included in the Recommendation.
An Accessibility Compliance Report has been submitted as part of the DA. This has identified that the existing ramped access at the front and rear, proposed to be retained, do not comply with AS1428.1-2009 in their current form. The Report concludes that compliance can be achieved by way of an Access Performance Solutions Report and some form of remedial work. This has bene conditioned.
The proposal would retain all existing canopy trees and landscaped area on the site and would not give rise to any adverse impacts to the adjoining development.
The Development Application was notified in accordance with Council’s notification policy and no submissions were received.
The Development Application is reported to the Lane Cove Local Planning Panel to determine on behalf of Council with a recommendation for approval.
SITE
Property |
Lot No. 51 DP No. 10155 |
Area |
743.25m² |
Site location |
47 Burns Bay Road, Lane Cove |
Existing improvements |
The site is developed with a single storey brick residence and driveway adjacent the eastern side boundary which connects to at an-grade car parking area for four (4) cars including one (1) accessible space at the rear. A covered timber deck with storage lockers adjacent to the western boundary connects the building to a sheltered area at the rear. The site is currently vacant but was previously used as a pre-school. Disabled ramp access is provided from Burns Bay Road to the front of the building. A landscaped garden bed runs along the rear boundary and part of the western rear boundary. The site comprises four large canopy trees including two palms adjacent to the rear boundary and one (1) large tree within the front setback. |
Shape |
Rectangular ü Irregular |
Dimensions |
Width 15.24m Depth 48.765m |
Adjoining properties |
North (rear): Rear of 12 Finlayson Street which is developed with a single-storey dwelling house. South (front): Burns Bay Road and two-storey commercial building (‘Harris Farm’) opposite the site. East: Two-storey commercial building with basement parking. West: Two-storey residential flat building |
Figure 1 Aerial locality plan.
Figure 2 Subject site as viewed from Burns Bay Road.
Figure 3 Rear yard looking north.
Figure 4 Rear north-western corner and adjoining landscaped garden beds.
Figure 5 Covered timber deck connecting the rear of the building to a covered area at the rear and metal storage sheds.
Figure 6 12 Finlayson Street to the rear of the subject site.
Figure 7 Adjoining residential flat building development to the west.
Figure 8 Adjoining two-storey commercial development with basement parking to the east.
PREVIOUS APPROVALS/HISTORY
DA315/2008 |
Conversion of Police Station to a pre-school. |
PROPOSAL
This application seeks consent for the following: · Change of use from a pre-school to ‘community facilities’ comprised of two (2) community libraries and a ‘Men’s Shed’ (refer Note below). · The conversion, occupation and fit-out of the existing building as a shared space with a “Sydney Library of Things”, “Toy Library” and some Men’s Shed facilities. · No demolition of internal walls or changes to the building exterior or existing window/door openings is proposed. · Demolition of the rear timber connection and associated structures and construction of a single-storey Men’s Shed (136m²) at the rear of the site. The shed will be constructed on an existing concrete area. · Removal of two (2) on-site car parking spaces and total number of two (2) spaces. · Operation hours as follows:
· Replacement of the existing signage structure with Council’s standard brown community information sign of irregular shape and size of approximately 2m².
Note: · The Lane Cove Men’s Shed was founded in 1996. · A Men’s Shed is a community facility where men, often retired, can share a wide range of tools, pursue interests and hobbies.
Figure 9 Proposed site plan.
Figure 10 Proposed internal fit-out of the existing building for the purpose of the two (2) libraries. Figure 11: Proposed front (street) elevation.
Figure 12: Proposed eastern elevation.
Figure 13: Proposed rear elevation. The Men’s Shed is setback 3.025m from the rear boundary.
|
PROPOSAL DATA/POLICY COMPLIANCE
SECTION 4.15 ASSESSMENT
The following assessment is provided against the relevant provisions of Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979:
Local Environmental Plan 2009 (Section 4.15(1)(a)(i))
The site is zoned R4 High density residential.
The proposal seeks to change the use of the site to Community Facilities, which is defined as:
“Community facility means a building or place –
(a) Owned and controlled by a public authority or non-profit organisation, and
(b) Used for the physical, social, cultural or intellectual development or welfare of the community,
But does not include an educational establishment, hospital, retail premises, place of worship or residential accommodation.”
The proposal is consistent with the definition above and is therefore permissible with consent.
Clause 5.10 Heritage Conservation
The site is not a heritage item or located within a heritage conservation area.
Comprehensive DCP
Part B.1 General objectives for the DCP
The proposal is consistent with the general objectives of Lane Cove DCP 2010 as set out under Clause 1.1.
Part B.8 Safety and Security
· The proposal will continue to provide casual surveillance of the adjoining public domain.
· Ramped access will continue to be provided at the building entrance.
The proposal is satisfactory regarding Part B.8 of Lane Cove DCP 1010.
Part C - Residential Development
While the site is zoned R4, there are no relevant provisions contained in Part C of the Lane Cove DCP 2010. Similarly, the specific controls pertaining to residential development in Locality 1 – Burns Bay Road do not apply.
Part D – Commercial Development and Mixed Use
Part D applies to development within the commercial and mixed-use zones. As the site is zoned R4 High density residential, the provisions do not strictly apply. Albeit a merit-based assessment has been applied and considers the more general provisions in Part D.
1.1 Building Form
1.1.1 Building to street frontages
The proposal will maintain the existing building and its contribution to defining the public domain. No works are proposed to the front setback or vehicular access. The new sign and required works to upgrade the existing ramped access will improve the presentation of the building to the streetscape.
1.1.6 Setbacks
A 3m rear setback applies to development in all business zones. The site adjoins E1 Local Centre (formerly B2 Local Centre) zoned land. The new Men’s Shed will be setback 3.025m from the rear boundary to existing single detached dwellings and would maintain the existing garden beds at the rear.
1.1.7 Building design and exteriors
The proposal is satisfactory regarding Section 1.1.7 of the Lane Cove DCP. The proposal will not alter the exterior of the existing building. The material schedule submitted for the new Men’s Shed would contribute positively to the streetscape.
1.3 Design and location of on-site parking
The proposal seeks to reduce the existing on-site parking provision to two spaces. Council’s Traffic Engineer has reviewed the application and determined that the provision of only one accessible space is suitable in the circumstances to allow for adequate turning space. A condition to this effect is included in the Recommendation.
No changes are proposed to the existing driveway and access.
1.7 External lighting of Buildings
The two (2) libraries are proposed to be open until 9am Mon-Friday.
A draft condition is recommended to require compliance with Australian Standard AS 4282-1997 – Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting.
1.8 Landscaping
No changes are proposed to the existing provision of deep soil landscaped area on the site. No trees are proposed to be removed.
Suitable conditions are included to protect the existing canopy trees on the site and Council Street tree on the road reserve.
1.11 Access and Mobility
Existing ramped access at the front and rear will be retained. A BCA and Disability (Access to Premises – Building) Standards 2010 compliance assessment report has been prepared by DPC.
The existing access ramps from the street and the pathway along the western boundary and rear ramps accessing the rear of the site do not comply with AS1428.1-2009 in their current form. It is anticipated that many of the non-complying aspects of the existing accessways could be rationalized by way of an Access Performance Solutions Report. However, it is expected that some form of remedial work would be required to the existing conditions. This would most likely include:
· Localised re-grading, topping and leveling of the various parts of the access ramps and landings.
· Upgrading of the existing handrails and tactile indicators.
· Removal of the palisade fence gates within the paths of travel.
In accordance with the accessibility compliance report, the following recommendations are included as a draft condition:
· An access performance solution rationalizing the design of the external access paths is to be provided with the application for a Construction Certificate.
· Details of any trial design requirements from the access performance solution are to be provided with the application for the Construction Certificate.
· The Construction Certificate plans, and documentation shall demonstrate compliance with AS1428.1-2009: Design for access and mobility. All continuous paths of travel shall be accessible and comply with AS1428.1-2009.
The provision of at least one (1) accessible parking space in accordance with AS2890.6-2009 is conditioned.
D.3 Development within Lane Cove Village Centre
The site is located within the Lane Cove Village Centre. The proposal is consistent with the objectives for the Lane Cove Village Centre.
There are no further matters for consideration.
Other Relevant Considerations
Noise
An Acoustic Assessment Report has been prepared by Renzo Tonin & Associates. This has regard to Part B5.4 which contains noise provisions for development in B4 Mixed Use zones. These provisions do not strictly apply but form a useful benchmark.
Mechanical plant has not been selected at the DA stage. The acoustic report anticipates the following plant and equipment will be provided:
· AC condenser serving the refurbished existing building (assumed noise level of 60dB(A) at 1m distance)
· Toilet exhaust fan (40dB(A) at 3m distance)
Air conditioning or extraction fans servicing the shed are not proposed at this stage. It is noted that the Men’s Shed will accommodate a workshop where powered hand tools will be used. This is the primary noise associated with the operation of the site.
The Acoustic report adopts the noise benchmarks contained in Part B5.4 (55dB(A) on weekdays and 50dB(A) on weekends) as a project goal for noise emissions from the use of powered tools and mechanical plant (AC/ventilation) and makes a series of recommendations (Section 6 of the Report) regarding the AC/toilet exhaust location, shed construction, and site management. No issues are raised regarding the proposed hours of operation. A draft condition requiring compliance with the Acoustic Report recommendations is included.
Hours of Operation
There are no issues from a planning perspective to the proposed hours of operation. These are endorsed via a draft condition of consent
Part N: Signage and Advertising
The application proposes to replace the existing signage structure (Figure 14) with Council’s standard brown community information sign of irregular shape and size of approximately 2m² (Figure 15). The new sign will be smaller in size and non-illuminated.
Figure 14 Existing pole signage frame.
Figure 15: Proposed free-standing sign within the front setback.
3.5 Pylon, Plinth and Pole Signage
The proposed free-standing sign is acceptable with regarding to the objectives in this section in that:
· The signage will provide clear identification of the community facilities.
· The signage is of an appropriate size to the size of the building to which it relates and will not impede pedestrian access.
· The signage will enhance and contribute to the amenity of the streetscape.
Pole signage is permitted in Lane Cove Village Town Centre to a maximum height of 2m and maximum dimensions of 0.4m and 0.6m. The signage will not exceed a height of 2m. The dimensions are contextually appropriate and acceptable on merit.
Part O: Stormwater Management
A stormwater and hydraulic plan is submitted with the proposal. No objections are raised by Council’s Development Engineer, subject to conditions.
Part Q: Waste Management and Minimisation
A site management/waste plan has been submitted for the construction period. No details of the bin storage location have been provided. The SEE states that waste will be managed through Councils regular waste management service. A draft condition is included as follows:
“Waste Management:
The construction certificate drawings shall detail compliance with the requirements of Part Q of Lane Cove DCP 2010 for all waste and recycling, and bulky waste storage.
Bins shall be located at the rear and shall not be visible from the public domain. Bins shall be presented for kerbside collection and returned to their location at the rear following servicing by Councils regular waste management service.”
Part R: Traffic, Transport & Parking
The proposal will reduce the existing on-site car parking provision from four to two (2) spaces.
A merit-based assessment for proposed traffic generation and parking rates applies to development for the purposes of a library community facility. A minimum of 1 disabled space is required. This is conditioned.
The provision of one (1) Accessible on site car parking space is considered appropriate to the proposed use for the following reasons:
· The site is centrally located within Lane Cove Village and is accessible by walking and public transport (buses).
· The site is located within walking distance of multiple public car parking facilities (Sera Street Car Park, Woolworths car park, Canopy car park).
· The traffic generation would be less than the existing use as a pre-school.
· The proposed community uses are not considered to give rise to any adverse traffic or parking impacts in the surrounding locality.
· The proposed uses are not considered to warrant the need for a designated loading area. There is on-street parking available on Burns Bay Road. The car parking area at the rear may also be utilised for any deliveries (library books or other) if required.
The proposal is acceptable regarding Part R of the Lane Cove DCP 2010.
REFERRALS
Development Engineer
No objections subject to recommended draft conditions.
Traffic Engineer
Council’s Traffic Engineer has reviewed the application and determined that the proposal is acceptable, subject to the provision of only one (1) accessible on-site parking space to allow for adequate turning space.
Lane Cove LOCAL Environmental Plan 2009 (Section 79c(1)(a))
The proposal is permissible, complies with the development standards for Floor Space Ratio and height and does not raise any issues in regard to the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009.
Other Planning Instruments
SEPP 55 Remediation of Land
The subject site and adjoining sites are zoned for residential purposes. Given the types of uses permissible within the residential zones, it is unlikely that the site would be contaminated.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Section 61(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 requires the consent authority to consider the Australian Standard AS 2601-2001: The Demolition of Structures. As the proposal involves removal of landscaped area, compliance with AS2601-2001 is included as a draft condition.
LIKELY IMPACTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT (Section 4.15(1)(b))
The impacts of the development have been considered. The proposal is not considered to give rise to any adverse environmental, social or economic impacts, subject to the draft recommended conditions of consent.
SUITABILITY OF THE SITE (Section 4.15(1)(b))
The proposal (as amended by the draft conditions) is suitable for the site and will improve the amenity of the existing community facility for club members and members of the public.
RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION (Section 4.15C(1)(d))
The application was notified in accordance with Council’s Community Participation Plan 2019 from 24 April to 9 May 2023. No submissions were received.
CONCLUSION
The matters in relation to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 have been satisfied.
The application is acceptable regarding the Lane Cove LEP 2009, and the Lane Cove DCP 2010. The proposal will provide valuable community facilities for use by the local community.
On balance, the proposed development would be reasonable and is therefore recommended for approval.
That ppursuant to Section 4.16(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 the Lane Cove Local Planning Panel at its meeting of 15 August 2023, exercising the functions of Council as the consent authority, grant consent to Development Application 39/2023 for extension to an existing shade cloth and associated works – Longueville Sporting Club at 243 Longueville Road, Longueville, subject to the following conditions:
PART A – GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. A.2 - Design amendments Before the issue of a construction certificate, the certifier must ensure the approved construction certificate plans (and specifications) detail the following required amendments to the approved plans and supporting documentation stamped by Council:
1) The proposal shall be amended to provide only one (1) accessible car parking space that has been designed in accordance with AS2890.6-2009.
Reason: To require minor amendments to the approved plans and supporting documentation following assessment of the development.
2. A.1 - Approved plans and supporting documentation Development must be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and supporting documentation (stamped by Council), except where the conditions of this consent expressly require otherwise.
In the event of any inconsistency between the approved plans and the supporting documentation, the approved plans prevail. In the event of any inconsistency between the approved plans and any condition(s) of this consent, the condition(s) prevails. Note: An inconsistency occurs between an approved plan and supporting documentation or between an approved plan and a condition when it is not possible to comply with both at the relevant time.
Reason: To ensure all parties are aware of the approved plans and supporting documentation that applies to the development.
3. A.3 - Payment of security deposits (if applicable) Before the commencement of any works on the site or the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant must make all of the following payments to Council and provide written evidence of these payments to the Certifier:
A $4000.00 cash bond or bank guarantee shall be lodged with Council to cover any infrastructure damage.
The payments will be used for the cost of: · making good any damage caused to any council property (including street trees) as a consequence of carrying out the works to which the consent relates, · completing any public work such as roadwork, kerbing and guttering, footway construction, stormwater drainage and environmental controls, required in connection with this consent, and
Reason: To ensure any damage to public infrastructure is rectified and public works can be completed.
4. A.7.L Tree preservation a) cut down, fell, uproot, kill, poison, ringbark, burn or otherwise destroy the vegetation, or b) lop or otherwise remove a substantial part of the vegetation.
The clearing of trees or vegetation protected by the regulation is an offence against the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). No Trees are to be removed as part of this consent. The existing canopy trees on the site (2 palms at the rear and one tree in the front setback) and Council Street tree are to be retained and protected in accordance with AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites. Reason: To ensure the protection of trees to be retained.
5. No building or demolition works prior to release of construction certificate The building work, or demolition work, must not commence until: a) A Construction Certificate has been obtained from the Council or an Accredited Certifier in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979. b) A Principal Certifying Authority has been appointed and Council has been notified of the appointment in accordance with the EP&A Act 1979 and the EP&A Regulation 2021. c) Council is given at least two days’ notice in writing of the intention to commence the building works.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
6. A.9.T Works on Council land Separate application shall be made to Council’s Urban and Services Division if there is any associated work on Council property. Written approval is to be obtained prior to the start of any works on Council property.
Reason: To manage impacts to Council’s assets.
PART B – PRIOR TO DEMOLITION WORKS
7. B.3.EH Compliance with demolition standard Demolition of buildings and structures must comply with Australian Standard AS 2601—2001: The Demolition of Structures.
Reason: Prescribed condition under EP&A Regulation 2021.
8. B.4.EH Demolition work plan The name, address, contact details and licence number of the Demolisher / Asbestos Removal Contractor. - Details of hazardous materials (including asbestos). - Method/s of demolition (including removal of any asbestos). - Measures and processes to be implemented to ensure the health & safety of workers and community. - Measures to be implemented to minimise any airborne dust and asbestos. - Methods and location of disposal of any hazardous materials (including asbestos). - Other relevant details, measures and requirements to be implemented. - Details of re-use, recycling and disposal of waste materials. - Date the demolition works will commence.
Reason: To ensure health and safety.
PART C - BEFORE THE ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
9. C.1 – Construction site management plan Prior to any demolition works and before the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant must ensure a construction site management plan is prepared before it is provided to and approved by the certifier. The plan must include the following matters: · location and materials for protective fencing and hoardings to the perimeter on the site. · provisions for public safety · pedestrian access, including disabled and pram access, is to be maintained throughout the course of the construction as per AS-1742.3, ’Part 3 - Traffic control devices for works on roads’. · Tree protection measures in accordance with AS4970-2009 for the canopy trees on the site (2 palms at the rear and one tree in the front setback) and Council Street tree. · pedestrian and vehicular site access points and construction activity zones · location of site storage areas and sheds · equipment used to carry out all work. · a garbage container with a tight-fitting lid · protection measures of existing Council pipe system, trees and street assets. The applicant must ensure a copy of the approved construction site management plan is kept on-site at all times during construction.
Council Approvals 1. Where hoarding is required to be provided along the street frontage, a Hoarding Application is to be submitted to Council for approval. 2. Any construction plant on the public road reservation requires an approved “Application for standing plant permit”.
Reason: To require details of measures that will protect the public, and the surrounding environment, during site works and construction.
10. C.2 - Erosion and sediment control plan Prior to any works (including demolition) and before the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant is to ensure that an erosion and sediment control plan is prepared in accordance with the following documents before it is provided to and approved by the certifier: · Council’s development control plan, · the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction Certificate’ (the Blue Book), and · the ‘Do it Right On-Site, Soil and Water Management for the Construction Industry' (Southern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils and the Natural Heritage Trust). The applicant must ensure the erosion and sediment control plan is kept on- site at all times during site works and construction.
11. C.7 - Car parking details
1. One (1) accessible car parking space shall be provided in accordance with AS2890.6-2009. 2. Before the issue of the relevant construction certificate, a suitably qualified engineer must review the plans which relate to parking facilities and provide written evidence, to the certifier’s satisfaction, demonstrating compliance with the relevant parts of AS 2890 Parking Facilities: Off- Street Carparking.
Reason: To ensure parking facilities are designed in accordance with the Australian Standard.
12. Waste Management The construction certificate drawings shall detail compliance with the requirements of Part Q of Lane Cove DCP 2010 for all waste and recycling, and bulky waste storage.
Bins shall be located at the rear and shall not be visible from the public domain. Bins shall be presented for kerbside collection and returned to their location at the rear following servicing by Councils regular waste management service.
Reason: To comply with Council car parking requirements.
13. C.16.EH - Construction waste management plan Prior to the commencement of any works on the subject site, a construction waste management plan (CWMP) must be prepared for the development by a suitably qualified person in consultation with the Council and be submitted for approval. The CWMP must address, but not be limited to, the following matters: · Recycling of demolition materials including concrete. · Removal of hazardous materials and disposal at an approved waste disposal facility in accordance with the requirements of the relevant legislation, codes, standards and guidelines, prior to the commencement of any building works. · Details of methods to be used to prevent spill, escape of any dust, waste or spoil from the vehicles or trailers used to transport waste or excavation spoil from the site. · Details demonstrating compliance with the relevant legislative requirements, associated with the removal of hazardous waste (if present), particularly the method of containment and control of emission of fibres to the air, must be submitted to the satisfaction of the Certifying Authority prior to the removal of any hazardous materials. · Provide details of truck routes and make appropriate notifications as required to comply with current regulations. The Applicant must submit a copy of the CWMP for review to Council prior to the commencement of work.
Reason: To promote resource recovery and environmental protection.
14. C.22.B - Accessibility requirements The construction certificate drawings shall detail compliance with: a) Disability (Access to premises – buildings) standards 2010 including AS1428.1-2009: Design for access and mobility b) Building Code of Australia c) Recommendations contained in the approved Access Compliance Report prepared by DPC (Report J4586), dated 17/07/2023.
Additional requirements: · An access performance solution rationalizing the design of the external access paths is to be provided with the application for a Construction Certificate. · Details of any trial design requirements from the access performance solution are to be provided with the application for the Construction Certificate. · The Construction Certificate plans, and documentation shall demonstrate compliance with. All continuous paths of travel shall be accessible and comply with AS1428.1-2009.
Reason: To ensure equitable access and compliance with statutory requirements.
15. C.20.EH - Compliance with acoustic report The Construction Certificate drawings shall demonstrate compliance with the recommendations contained in Section 6 of the Acoustic Report, prepared by Renzo Tonin & Associates, Revision 1 dated 29 June 2023, as follows:
The Report is to include details of the specified AC plant, toilet exhaust and any other plant equipment for which details are unknown at the DA stage.
Reason: To ensure acoustic mitigation measures adhere to relevant standards/requirements.
16. C.24.E - Structural Engineer’s details The Construction Certificate plans and specifications must include detailed professional structural engineering plans and/or specifications for the following (where relevant): · underpinning · retaining walls · footings · reinforced concrete work · structural steelwork and where relevant in accordance with any recommendations contained in an approved geotechnical report.
Reason: To ensure structural adequacy.
PART D – BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF BUILDING WORK (INCLUDING DEMOLITION)
17. D.1 - Erosion and sediment controls in place Before the commencement of any site or demolition works, the principal certifier must be satisfied the erosion and sediment controls in the erosion and sediment control plan, (as approved by the principal certifier) are in place until the site is rectified (at least 70% ground cover achieved over any bare ground on site).
Reason: To ensure runoff and site debris do not impact local stormwater systems and waterways.
18. D.2 - Tree protection measures Before the commencement of any demolition works, the principal certifier must ensure the measures for tree protection detailed in the construction site management plan are in place. Tree protection measures shall comply with AS4970-2009 – Protection of trees on development sites.
Reason: To retail and protect trees on the site.
19. D.3 - Signs on site A sign must be erected in a prominent position on any site on which the building and demolition work is being carried out: a) showing the name, address and telephone number of the principal certifier for the work, and b) showing the name of the principal contractor (if any) for any building work and a telephone number on which that person may be contacted outside working hours, and c) stating that unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited. a) Any such sign is to be maintained while the building work or demolition work is being carried out but must be removed when the work has been completed.
Note: This does not apply in relation to building work or demolition work that is carried out inside an existing building that does not affect the external walls of the building.
Reason: Prescribed condition EP&A Regulation, clauses 98A (2) and (3).
PART E: CONDITIONS TO BE COMPLIED WITH WHILE WORKS ARE BEING CARRIED OUT
20. E.1 - Hours of work The principal certifier must ensure that building work, demolition or vegetation removal is only carried out between:
Monday to Friday (inclusive) 7am to 5.30pm Saturday 8am to 12 noon Sunday and public holidays No works permitted
with NO high noise generating activities, including excavation, haulage truck movement, rock picking, sawing, jack hammering or pile driving to be undertaken. Failure to fully comply will result in the issue of a breach of consent P.I.N.
A Notice/Sign showing permitted working hours and types of work permitted during those hours, including the applicant’s phone number, project manager or site foreman, shall be displayed at the front of the site. The principal certifier must ensure demolition is not carried out on Sundays and public holidays, except where there is an emergency. Unless otherwise approved within a construction site management plan, demolition/construction vehicles, machinery, goods, or materials must not be delivered to the site outside the approved hours. Note: Any variation to the hours of work requires Council’s approval.
Reason: To protect the amenities of the surrounding area.
21. E.2 - Compliance with the Building Code of Australia All works must comply with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia.
22. E.6 - Surveys by a registered surveyor While building work is being carried out, a registered surveyor is to measure and mark the positions of the following and provide them to the principal certifier — b) At other stages of construction – any marks that are required by the principal certifier.
Reason: To ensure buildings are sited and positioned in the approved location
23. E.8 - Tree protection While demolition and building work is being carried out, the applicant must maintain all required tree protection measures in good condition in accordance with the construction site management plan required under this consent, and the relevant requirements of AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites. This includes maintaining adequate soil grades and ensuring all machinery, builders refuse, spoil and materials remain outside tree protection zones.
Reason: To protect trees during demolition works.
24. E.9 - Responsibility for changes to public infrastructure While building work is being carried out, the applicant must pay any costs incurred as a result of the approved removal, relocation or reconstruction of infrastructure (including ramps, footpaths, kerb and gutter, light poles, kerb inlet pits, service provider pits, street trees or any other infrastructure in the street footpath area).
Reason: To ensure payment of approved changes to public infrastructure.
25. E.13 - Waste management While building work, demolition or vegetation removal is being carried out, the principal certifier must be satisfied all waste management is undertaken in accordance with the approved waste management plan. Upon disposal of waste, the applicant is to compile and provide records of the disposal to the principal certifier, detailing the following: · The contact details of the person(s) who removed the waste · The waste carrier vehicle registration · The date and time of waste collection · A description of the waste (type of waste and estimated quantity) and whether the waste is expected to be reused, recycled or go to landfill · The address of the disposal location(s) where the waste was taken · The corresponding tip docket/receipt from the site(s) to which the waste is transferred, noting date and time of delivery, description (type and quantity) of waste. Note: If waste has been removed from the site under an EPA Resource Recovery Order or Exemption, the applicant is to maintain all records in relation to that Order or Exemption and provide the records to the principal certifier and Council. Reason: To require records to be provided, during construction, documenting that waste is appropriately handled.
26. E.16.T – Works zones Loading or unloading of any vehicle or trailer carrying material associated with the development must not take place on the public road unless within an approved Works Zone. If a Works Zone is required, the developer must give the Council at least six (6) weeks written notice prior to the date upon which use of the Works Zone will commence. The duration of the Works Zone approval shall be taken to commence from that date. All vehicular unloading/loading activities on a public roadway/footway are to be undertaken within an approved Works Zone.
Reason: To ensure pedestrian and traffic safety.
27. E.17.E – Heavy vehicle requirements 1. All contractors are to be notified of Council’s requirements regarding truck cleanliness of vehicles leaving the site. A signed registered of all notified contractors is to be kept. Failure to comply shall result in the contractor not being permitted re-entry to the site. 2. All vehicles transporting soil material to and from the site shall be covered by a tarpaulin or similar material in accordance with the Protection of the Environment Operations (Waste) Regulation, 1996 (as amended). Any breach will result in a PIN being issued. 3. A truck shaker ramp is to be provided at the construction exit point. Any sediment tracked onto any public roadway is to be cleared immediately. Reason: To protect the environment.
28. E.18.B - No obstruction of public way The public way must not be obstructed by any materials, vehicles, refuse, skips or the like, under any circumstances. Non-compliance with this requirement will result in the issue of a notice by Council to stop all work on site.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
29. E.19.B – Encroachments · No portion of the proposed structure shall encroach onto the adjoining properties. · The proposed construction shall not encroach onto any existing Council stormwater line or drainage easement unless approved by Council. · No encroachment is to occur into public open space.
Reason: To ensure works are contained wholly within the subject site
30. E.25 – Stockpiling of materials
No stockpiling of materials, building equipment or additional activities listed in section 4.2 of AS4970-2009 The Protection of trees on Development Sites is to occur within designated tree protection areas or on the Council Owned Nature Strip. All building materials must be stored within the subject site.
Reason: To mitigate damage to Council land.
31. E.20.EH – Stockpiles Stockpiles of topsoil, sand, aggregate, spoil or other material capable of being moved by water to be stored clear of any drainage line, easement, natural watercourse, footpath, kerb or roadside.
Reason: To mitigate adverse environmental impacts on the surrounding area.
PART F – BEFORE THE ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
32. F.1 - Works-as-executed plans and any other documentary evidence Before the issue of the relevant occupation certificate, the applicant must submit, to the satisfaction of the principal certifier, works-as-executed plans, any compliance certificates and any other evidence confirming the following completed works: a) All stormwater drainage systems and storage systems b) The following matters that Council requires to be documented: · The stormwater from any new and existing roof/impervious area can be connected to existing drainage system. In this case, a hydraulic engineer’s certificate is required that the existing drainage system is in good working condition and satisfies Part O of Council stormwater DCP for proposed addition of stormwater. · Certification from suitable licensed contractor that all works have been constructed satisfying relevant Australian standards. · Certification from qualified structural engineer that the proposed construction have been completed according to approved plan and structurally satisfied.
The principal certifier must provide a copy of the plans to Council with the Occupation certificate.
Reason: To confirm that the proposed works have been constructed satisfactorily as per approved plans
33. F.5 - Repair of infrastructure Before the issue of an occupation certificate, the applicant must ensure any public infrastructure damaged as a result of the carrying out of building works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concreting vehicles) is fully repaired to the written satisfaction of Council, and at no cost to Council.
Note: If the council is not satisfied, the whole or part of the bond submitted will be used to cover the rectification work.
Reason: To ensure any damage to public infrastructure is rectified.
34. F.6 - Removal of waste upon completion Before the issue of an occupation certificate, the principal certifier must ensure all refuse, spoil and material unsuitable for use on-site is removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with the approved waste management plan. Written evidence of the removal must be supplied to the satisfaction of the principal certifier. Before the issue of a partial occupation certificate, the applicant must ensure the temporary storage of any waste is carried out in accordance with the approved waste management plan to the principal certifier’s satisfaction.
Reason: To ensure waste material is appropriately disposed or satisfactorily stored.
35. F.13.EH - Outdoor lighting Outdoor lighting shall comply with Australian Standard AS 4282-1997 – Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting.
Reason: To mitigate any adverse glare impacts and promote safety and security.
PART H – OCCUPATION AND ONGOING USE
36. Hours of Operation of Community Facilities The hours of operation are limited to the following:
Reason: To mitigate adverse amenity impacts upon the Local Centre |
There are no supporting documents for this report.
Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Meeting 15 August 2023
54 Kallaroo Road, Riverview
Subject: 54 Kallaroo Road, Riverview
Record No: DA23/66-01 - 44712/23
Division: Environmental Services Division
Author(s): Henry Burnett
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO LOCAL PLANNING PANEL
The Development Application is referred to the Lane Cove Local Planning Panel for determination as the applicant has been engaged by Council to provide consultancy services on other planning matters. Accordingly, both an independent assessment and determination is required to avoid any actual or perceived conflict of interest.
Property: |
54 Kallaroo Road, Riverview Lot 115 DP 16472 |
DA No: |
DA66/2023 |
Date Lodged: |
21 June 2023 |
Cost of Work: |
$129,500.00 |
Owner: |
Mr Julian Frecklington |
Applicant: |
Mrs Philippa Frecklington |
Description of proposal to appear on determination |
Alterations and additions to a dwelling house |
Zone |
R2 Low Density Residential |
Is the proposal permissible within the zone |
Yes |
Is the property a heritage item |
No |
Is the property within a conservation area |
No |
Is the property adjacent to bushland |
Yes, the site adjoins a bushland reserve adjacent to Tambourine Bay. |
BCA Classification |
Class 1a and 10b |
Stop the Clock used |
No |
Notification |
Notified in accordance with the Community Participation Plan and nil submissions were received. |
SITE
Property |
Lot 115 DP 16472 |
Area |
791m2 |
Site location |
The site is located on the southern side of Kallaroo Road. |
Existing improvements |
Dwelling house |
Shape |
Irregular |
Dimensions |
Northern (Front) Boundary: 15.24m Western (Side) Boundary: 57.895m Eastern (Side) Boundary: 52.115m Southern (Rear) Boundary: Non-linear |
Adjoining properties |
Nos. 50 and 54 Kallaroo Road. |
Figure 1 – Aerial Photograph
PREVIOUS APPROVALS/HISTORY
Date |
Description |
16 May 2022 |
Development Application Ref. DA37/2022 for a double carport and driveway crossing. |
1 December 2022 |
Complying Development Certificate Ref. CDC 22141-1 for demolition of the existing dwelling, construction of a two storey dwelling and construction of retaining walls approved by the Certifying Authority. |
This assessment report is limited to assessing the proposed development and does not include an assessment of DA37/2022 or CDC 22141-1.
PROPOSAL
The Development Application (DA) seeks to undertake alterations and additions to an approved, but not yet constructed, dwelling house.
The demolition of the existing dwelling house and construction of a new dwelling house was approved under a complying development certificate issued by a private certifier.
A summary of the proposed alterations and additions at each level is provided as follows:
- Lower Floor Plan: Additional floor area including a bedroom, hallway, store and bathroom. This involves the conversion of a plant room for water heaters and air-conditioning units being changed to part of the proposed bedroom. The relocation of the water heaters and air-conditioning units is not shown on the plans.
- Mid-Level Floor Plan: An extension of a deck by 1m on the mid-level floor plan;
- Upper Floor Plan: No change proposed.
PROPOSAL DATA/POLICY COMPLIANCE
Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009
Zoning: R2 Low Density Residential Site Area: 791m²
|
Control |
Proposed |
Complies |
Floor Space Ratio |
0.5:1 |
0.46:1 366.34m2 : 791m2 |
Yes |
Height of Buildings |
9.5m |
4.63m (deck) |
Yes |
Lane Cove Development Control Plan 2009
|
Control |
Proposed |
Complies |
Side setback (min) |
1.5m |
3.00m (Deck extension) 1.56m (Lower floor excavation extent)
|
Yes |
Rear setback (min) |
25% of site depth (13m) to building
|
14.145m to mid-level. |
Yes |
Maximum Ridge height |
9.5m |
No change.
|
N/A |
Number of Storeys (max) |
2 storeys |
3 storeys
|
No, variation required (see below). |
Landscaped area (min)
|
35% (276.85m2) |
53.5% (423.46m2) |
Yes |
Cut and Fill (max) |
1m |
2.5m
|
No, variation required (see below). |
Solar Access |
3 hrs to north-facing windows |
The additional lower floor room and deck extension will not result in adverse solar access impacts. |
Yes |
Provide for view sharing |
Tenacity Planning Principle
|
The additional lower floor room and deck extension will not result in adverse view sharing impacts. |
Yes |
Deck/Balcony depth (max) |
3m |
The deck is extending by 1m which will increase the depth to 3.685m. |
No, variation required (see below). |
Private open space |
24 m² (min) 4m minimum depth |
Complies. |
Yes |
BASIX |
Required. |
BASIX certificate No. A499546 provided. |
Yes |
In addition to the above compliance table, the proposed development satisfies the relevant provisions of Part H – Bushland Protection, including being wholly outside the buffer zone, Part J – Landscaping, including no tree removal and Part Q – Waste Management and Minimisation.
REFERRALS
Development Engineer
No objections subject to recommended draft conditions. It is noted a number of the draft conditions provided within the development engineering referral relate to the CDC approval (stormwater design) and the carport construction (new vehicular crossing). These conditions have been excluded from the recommended draft conditions within this report as the works do not form part of the proposed development.
Other Planning Instruments
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
The DA was accompanied by a BASIX Certificate satisfying the provisions of SEPP (BASIX) 2004.
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021
Chapter 2 – Coastal Management
The site is subject to Chapter 2 – Coastal Management of SEPP (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 as follows:
- The site is within a Proximity Area for Coastal Wetlands mapped on the ‘Coastal Wetlands and Littoral Rainforests Area Map’;
- The site is within a Coastal Use Area as mapped on the ‘Coastal Use Area Map’; and
- The site is within a Coastal Environment Area as mapped on the ‘Coastal Environment Area Map’.
The proposed development is for alterations and additions to an approved dwelling house predominantly within the approved building envelope and will have negligible additional environmental impact. Accordingly, the mandatory pre-conditions and considerations contained within clause 2.8 of SEPP (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 are satisfied (noting the coastal use and coastal environment provisions do not apply as the land is within the Foreshores and Waterways Area within the meaning of SEPP (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Chapter 6 as per Section 2.10(3) and 2.11(2)).
Chapter 4 – Remediation of Land
The proposed development is for the continued residential use of the land with no known contamination on site. The consent authority can be satisfied in this instance that the land continues to be suitable for the purpose for which the development is proposed to be carried out under Section 4.6(1)(a) of SEPP (Resilience and Hazards) 2021.
State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021
Chapter 6- Water Catchments
The site is subject to Chapter 6 – Water Catchments of SEPP (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 as follows:
- The site is within the Sydney Habour Catchment mapped on the ‘Sydney Harbour Catchment Map’;
- The site is within the Sydney Harbour Foreshores and Waterways Area as mapped on the ‘Foreshores and Waterways Area Map’; and
- The site is partly within a Rocky Foreshores and Significant Seagrasses Area as mapped on the ‘Rocky Foreshores and Significant Seagrasses Map’.
The proposed development is for alterations and additions to an approved dwelling house predominantly within the approved building envelope and will have negligible additional environmental impact. Accordingly, the mandatory pre-conditions and considerations contained within Section 6.6-6.11 and Section 6.28 of SEPP (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 are satisfied.
Variations to Council’s Codes/PolicIes
The preceding policy assessment table identifies those controls that the proposal does not comply with. Each of the departures is discussed below.
Control |
Proposed |
Comment |
Council support |
Deck/balcony depth - 3m (max)
(Clause 1.8.2 (c)) |
3.685m |
While the proposal does not meet the numerical value of a maximum 3m in depth, the control states that a depth greater than 3m can be considered if privacy is addressed.
The CDC approved deck includes privacy screens to a height of 1700mm for the approved balcony depth (3m). It is noted that the east and western elevations have changed the balustrade details and the privacy screens are no longer shown.
The privacy screens are to be reinstated for the full length of the amended balcony depth.
The proposed variation is minor, being 0.685m greater than the allowable 3m depth.
The proposed deck extension has a side setback of 3m to the western boundary and 5.56m to the eastern boundary.
The proposed deck extension does not align with neighbouring windows and its outlook is towards Tambourine Bay.
Potential privacy impacts of the deck extension are considered to be minimal provided the privacy screens are constructed and therefore, the variation of 0.685m is considered acceptable on merit in this instance.
|
Yes |
Cut and Fill – 1m (max)
(Clause 1.6) |
2.5m |
The excavation for the additional lower floor areas requires up to 2.5m of cut.
The objectives of the DCP (Clause 1.6 – Cut and Fill) are as follows:
1 Retain the natural ground levels as much as possible of a site and its existing landforms particularly in relation to the street or adjacent private open space areas.
2 To achieve reasonable landscaping within development.
3 To minimise the extent of cut and fill and its impact along side boundaries.
4 To create a consistent relationship between the dwelling and the street.
5 To ensure that excavation and filling of a site does not result in unreasonable amenity impacts to adjoining dwellings.
6 To minimise change to water run-off patterns.
The additional excavation relates to a small portion of the site (approximately 25m2) relating to the corridor, bathroom, bedroom 5 and storeroom. The approved CDC also indicated a subfloor area in this zone. The additional excavation ranges from 0.5m (corridor) 1.2m (bedroom) to 2.5m (bathroom)
The additional excavation is adequately setback from the adjoining property (approximately 3m), is not apparent from the street, does not result in amenity impacts to adjoining dwellings, does not impact the extent of landscaping proposed on the site and is located beneath the footprint of the approved dwelling above and will therefore not change surface water run-off. The objectives of the control are satisfied. |
Yes |
Number of storeys - 2 (max)
(Clause 1.7.1(e)) |
3 storeys |
Due to the topography of the land, the current approved CDC for a two storey dwelling is split across lower floor, mid floor and upper floor.
This DA is seeking to increase the lower floor with an additional bedroom, bathroom and storage space. The location of the proposal would increase the number of storeys to 3 for a small portion of the dwelling.
The objectives of the DCP (Clause 1.7 – Building Design) are as follows:
1 Ensure new dwellings and alterations and additions to existing dwellings reinforce the typical bulk and scale of existing dwellings within the street and the area.
2 Ensure that alterations and additions to existing dwellings maintain the integrity of the design and style of the existing building.
3 Ensure elevations to the street and public domain are well proportioned and designed.
4 Minimise impact in terms of overshadowing, loss of privacy, light spillage to adjoining properties, loss of views and amenity.
The proposal remains under the maximum FSR and maximum height controls and does not change the design and style of the approved building.
The proposal will not increase the bulk and scale when viewed from the street or waterway.
The additional storey does not create any additional impacts referred to in the DCP objectives to adjoining properties.
The variation is considered acceptable in this instance on merit.
|
Yes |
RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION
The DA was notified in accordance with Council’s Community Participation Plan and no submissions were received.
OTHER MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION
Likely Impacts (Section 4.15(b) of the EP&A Act, 1979)
The likely impacts of the proposed development have been identified within this assessment report and are not considered to warrant refusal of the application. A condition is recommended in relation to the privacy screens on the western and eastern sides of the deck (being an extension of the privacy screens approved under the CDC).
It is noted that the architectural plans do not nominate a new location for the water heaters and air-conditioning units and a condition is imposed to clarify that the consent does not authorise their relocation elsewhere on the site and separate approvals might be required in this regard.
Site Suitability (Section 4.15(c) of the EP&A Act, 1979)
The site is suitable for residential development, with the proposed development forming part of a knock-down rebuild development approved using two other planning applications.
Public Interest ((Section 4.15(e) of the EP&A Act, 1979)
The continued use of the site for residential purposes in line with the development standards contained within the LEP and meeting the objectives contained within the DCP is considered to be in the public interest with impacts either addressed within the design or mitigated through draft conditions of consent.
Section 7.11/7.12 Contributions
No contributions are payable under Lane Cove Council’s Section 7.11 Contribution Plan as the site contains an existing single dwelling house entitlement.
Lane Cove Council does not have a Section 7.12 Contribution Plan.
CONCLUSION
The matters in relation to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 have been satisfied.
The proposed development is permissible with consent under Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009 and meets the development standards of building height and floor space ratio.
The proposed development includes three variations to Lane Cove Development Control Plan 2009 in relation to number storeys, cut and fill and deck depth. The objectives of the DCP are met despite numerical non-compliance and therefore the variations are considered acceptable on merit.
On balance the proposed development would be reasonable and therefore is recommended for approval.
There are no supporting documents for this report.
Lane Cove Local Planning Panel 15 August 2023
40 Arabella Street, Longueville
Subject: 40 Arabella Street, Longueville
Record No: DA23/26-01 - 19335/23
Division: Environmental Services Division
Author(s): Sam Wilson
Property: |
40 Arabella Street, Longueville |
DA No: |
DA26/2023 |
Date Lodged: |
28/03/2023 |
Cost of Work: |
$2,019,919.00 |
Owner: |
J Pan |
Applicant: |
A Prichard |
Description of the proposal to appear on determination |
Demolition of an existing two storey dwelling and construction of a two-storey dwelling house including an internal 4 car-stacker garage and a swimming pool. |
Zone |
R2 Low Density Residential |
Is the proposal permissible within the zone |
Yes |
Is the property a heritage item |
No |
Is the property within a conservation area |
No |
Is the property adjacent to bushland |
No |
BCA Classification |
Class 1a and 10b |
Stop the Clock used |
No |
Notification |
In accordance with Councils Policy. Submissions were received from: 27 Arabella Street, 38 Arabella Street, and 42 Arabella Street. |
SITE
Property |
Lot 14 DP 3957 |
Area |
1483.5m2 |
Site location |
The subject site is located on the eastern side of Arabella Street facing towards Woodford Bay. |
Existing improvements |
Two storey detached dwelling with swimming pool and attached carport. |
Shape |
Rectangular |
Dimensions |
North: 99.98m East: 16.3m South: 94.28m West: 15.24m |
Adjoining properties |
Adjoining properties consist of two storey detached dwelling houses. |
REASON FOR REFERRAL
The application is referred to Council’s Local Planning Panel for determination given the concerns raised by the residents with regards to impacts on views, is considered contentious.
PREVIOUS APPROVALS/HISTORY
No previous approval history.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
· On 28/03/2023 Development Application 26/2023 was lodged for the demolition of existing two storey dwelling and the construction of a two-storey dwelling including a swimming pool;
· On 28/03/2023 Development Application 26/2023 was notified in accordance with Council policy and 3 submissions were received. The concerns included were view loss, overshadowing, excess of excavation, removal of vegetation, height exceedance, loss of privacy Floor Space Ratio (FSR) breach, inadequate documentation, front and side setback breach, bulk and scale, and Structural Root Zone (SRZ) and Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) encroachment;
· The development application proposes 3 variations to LEP and DCP provisions;
· Council’s planner conducted a site visit to the subject site and the objectors sites;
· A request for further information was submitted to the Architect and revised plans and supporting documentation were submitted;
· On 20/06/2023 Development application 26/2023 was amended and the amended plans were re-notified to the same surrounding properties;
· Council received the same 3 objections from the neighbours outlining similar concerns (as previous) with the development; and
· The development is recommended for approval subject to the conditions.
PROPOSAL
The application seeks the approval for the following development;
Demolition: · Existing two storey detached dwelling house and swimming pool.
Excavation: · Approximately six (6) metres of cut and fill across the proposed building area.
Lower Ground Floor Level 03: · Infinity edge swimming pool; · Recreation and pool room with bathroom, kitchenette, and storage; · Pool equipment and pump room; · Landscaping, lawn, and planters; · Internal staircase to service all levels; and · External stairs to service all levels.
Lower Ground Floor Level 02: · Bedrooms 03, 04, and 05 – all with ensuites; · Balcony to service all three bedrooms with overhanging planters; · Rumpus room; and · Wine cellar. - Lower Ground Floor Level 01: · Bedroom 02 with an ensuite and balcony; · Master bedroom with an ensuite, master robe and balcony; · Laundry; · Study / Office; · Gym with an attached sauna area; · Bathroom; · Lower storage area of car stacker garage; and · Plant room.
Ground Floor: · Landscaped entrance from the street; · Four (4) car stacker garage (extends to lower ground floor level 01); · Front lounge room with access to garden courtyard; · Kitchen with a walk-in pantry; · Internal garden courtyard with landscaping; · Living room; · Dining room with access to garden courtyard; and · Cantilevered balcony.
|
PROPOSAL DATA/POLICY COMPLIANCE
Local Environmental Plan 2009
Zoning: R2 Low Density Site Area: 1483.5m²
|
Proposed |
Control |
Complies |
Floor Space Ratio |
0.44:1 |
0.5:1 |
Yes |
Height of Buildings |
8.71m |
9.5m |
Yes |
Comprehensive DCP
|
Proposed |
Control |
Complies |
Front setback (min)
|
7.795m |
Consistent with area or 7.5m |
Yes |
Side setback (min)
|
1.5m (all levels) |
1200mm single storey 1500mm two storey |
Yes Yes |
Rear setback (min) |
65.7m |
>1000m²: 10m or 35% |
Yes |
Wall Height (max) (max parapet of 600mm) |
7.2m |
7.0m |
No – see variations assessment. |
Maximum Ridge height |
8.8m |
9.5m |
Yes |
Number of Storeys (max) |
2 |
2 |
Yes – on merit. |
Landscaped area (min) (Minimum width of 1m required to be included in area) |
60% |
35% |
Yes |
Foreshore Building Line (min) |
Compliant. |
See DCP. |
Yes |
Cut and Fill (max) |
5.8m |
1m |
No – see variations assessment. |
Solar Access |
Complies. |
3 hrs to north-facing windows |
Yes |
Provide for view sharing |
Complies. |
See DCP. |
Yes |
Deck/Balcony depth (max) |
GL: 3.0m LGL01: 0.7m LGL02: 1.9m |
3m |
Yes Yes Yes |
Private open space |
Complies. |
24 m² (min) 4m minimum depth |
Yes |
Basix Certificate |
1368886S |
Required |
Yes |
Basix NatHers |
0008477648 |
Required |
Yes |
Car Parking
|
Proposed |
Control |
Complies |
Off-street spaces (min) |
4 |
2 |
Yes |
Driveway width |
5.2m |
3m at the lot boundary |
Yes |
Private Swimming Pools
|
Proposed |
Control |
Complies |
Setback to Neighbour’s House (min) |
4.5m – to neighbours building line. |
3m to waterline |
Yes
|
Setback to boundary (min) |
North: 3.5m South: 3.5m |
1m to waterline |
Yes |
Height (max) (steeply sloping sites) |
4.6m |
1.8m |
No – see variations assessment. |
Setback from boundary if coping is above ground level (existing) (min) |
3.5m |
Coping to be set back at a ratio of 1:1 |
Yes |
Fences
|
Proposed |
Control |
Complies |
Front fence height (max)
|
1.8m |
Solid: 900mm Lightweight: 1.2m |
Yes |
Setback from front boundary if > 1.2m |
1m |
1m |
Yes |
Side and rear fences |
Side (GL) – 1.8m |
1.8m |
Yes |
LDCP Part B.4 – View Sharing
The sharing of all views is part of the character of the Lane Cove area and should be maintained where possible subject to how the view is obtained and whether the maintenance of such a view creates an unreasonable impost on adjoining landowners. Views gained across other privately-owned land are not “as of right”, as some may depend on the property that is overviewed maintaining a lower scale that is achievable under the LEP.
The Tenacity principle is a 4-step test implemented by the Land and Environment Court for the purposes of view loss assessment. The objectives of the B.4 View sharing section of the Lane Cove Council DCP 2010 outline the key components of this 4-step view sharing principle.
The four steps of the Tenacity principle area as follows:
· Step 1. Assessing the types of views to be affected. Water views are valued more highly than land views. Iconic views are valued more highly than views without icons. Whole views are valued more highly than partial views.
· Step 2. Assessing what part of the property the views are obtained. Side views are harder to protect than rear or front views and seated views are harder to protect than standing views and living rooms and kitchens are more valuable than bedrooms.
· Step 3. Assessing the extent of the impact. This should be done for the whole of the property, not just the view that is affected.
· Step 4. Assessing the reasonableness of the proposal. A proposal which is fully compliant is more reasonable than one which doesn’t comply, and proposals which have been skilfully designed are considered more reasonable.
Figure 1: Location of site (source: spatial viewer)
27 Arabella Street, Longueville
A summarised view analysis from utilising the Tenacity principle is provided below.
View analysis |
|
Property location |
View Analysis |
27 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 2: Bedroom 2 Room View (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – The bulk and scale of the proposal would impose minimal impacts on views to the Harbour Bridge, Anzac Bridge, city skyline and Woodford Bay. These partial impacts consist of the removal of a portion of Harbour Bridge views, with both pylons and the lower portion of the bridge. There is negligible impact on city skyline and district views, and minor loss of land/water interface views along the southern view corridor. The subject view is obtained from the lower ground level at bedroom 2. It is assumed that the space will primarily be utilised during evening hours, thus, the retained views are of less significance – yet are still primarily retained.
|
27 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 3: Living Room View (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – The proposed building profile does not obscure any significant views or outlooks to the Harbour Bridge, Anzac Bridge, city skyline or Woodford Bay when obtained from the living room. The outlook from this vantage point is considered to be compliant with the principles of Tenacity.
|
27 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 4: Main Deck View (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – Similar to the viewport experienced from the living room, the outlook from the main front deck comprises of areas of significance such as the Harbour Bridge, the Anzac Bridge, the city skyline, Woodford Bay and the greater Lane Cove River. A minimal portion of the inlet view to Woodford Bay is obscured by the ridgeline of the building envelope. When considered in its entirety, there would be reasonable impacts on the subject view.
|
38 Arabella Street, Longueville
A summarised view analysis from utilising the Tenacity principle is provided below.
View analysis |
|
Property location |
View Analysis |
38 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 2: Living Room View (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – There would be minimal impacts on the water views of the Lane Cove River and Woodford Bay. The subject view is obtained from the existing balcony. As substantiated in the image, the building profile obscures existing district views to the South of 38 Arabella Street and the adjoining southern properties. However, as reasoned under Tenacity, this view that includes the Anzac Bridge is not categorised as an ‘iconic view’ and therefore the impact is considered to be of minimal affect.
|
38 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 3: Kitchen View (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – Similar to the views from the living room, the kitchen outlook to the south is obscured by the proposed development. While there is loss of the Anzac Bridge view from the kitchen window, this is not specifically categorised as an iconic view under Tenacity, and would be similarly impacted by a built form that further increased the rear setback and complied with the wall height at the rear of the dwelling. Given the views obtained from this neighbour are across a side boundary they are difficult to retain, and coupled with the underdeveloped nature of the site any new dwelling (even one fully compliant with the LEP and DCP standards) would have a similar impact. In these circumstances, it is less reasonable to expect all views, including district views, are retained across a side boundary. Subsequently, Council regards the view loss insignificant. |
38 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 4: Master Bedroom View (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – The development proposes a levelled landscaping area at the rear that features a pool and associated vegetation. The height and extension of this area incurs no impact on the views and outlooks experienced from the master bedroom. It is considered that the design is skilful and therefore meets the requirements of the principles in Tenacity. |
42 Arabella Street, Longueville
A summarised view analysis from utilising the Tenacity principle is provided below.
View analysis |
|
Property location |
View Analysis |
42 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 2: Ground Level Balcony View (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – There would be minimal impacts on the water views of the Lane Cove River and Woodford Bay. The subject view is obtained from the existing balcony at 42 Arabella Street. As substantiated in the image, the building profile does not obscure or intrude on views of importance. The analysis is considered satisfactory.
|
42 Arabella Street, Longueville
Figure 3: First Level Balcony (Source: Deneb Design) |
Satisfactory – The proposed dwelling extends past the existing building line of 42 Arabella Street by approximately 5.1m. However, as the views to the north of this site are low level significance and all preferable views are directly east toward Woodford Bay, the result is considered negligible. |
LDCP Part B.5 – Development in Foreshore Areas (Section 4.15(1)(a)ii)
The proposed development is identified as being located within a registered foreshore area. The objectives for development within foreshore areas are to maintain or enhance existing amenity, minimise impact on the views from the foreshore and ensure that architectural character of the locality through suitable scale and bulk. The scope of works listed within the proposal do not contribute to an unreasonable development. Moreover, the architectural design and associated landscaping is expected to create a high-quality visual aesthetic that contributes to the prestige of the Longueville locality and will inspire excellence in design for future developments.
LDCP Part H – Bushland Protection (Section 4.15(1)(a)ii)
Part H of the LDCP applies to the land identified on Councils map entitled Land Adjoining Bushland. Although the subject site does not contain bushland, the south-eastern rear boundary adjoins to the C2 environmental conservation area towards Woodford Bay. Due to the location of the proposal on the subject site, it is unlikely that any adverse impacts will affect the bushland to the rear. The following objectives ensure the mitigation of any impact on the bushland zone;
Part H.1 – Objectives
The relevant sections within Part H of the LDCP are addressed under the separate sub-headings below:
· To protect bushland from development;
· To retain and protect, inter alia, bushland area, plant species communities, and native fauna habitat;
· To maintain areas of bushland;
· To acknowledge the importance of bushland; and
· To encourage innovation and attractive designs which acknowledge the importance of bushland areas through the control of the building location, building form, soft and hard landscape elements, and engineering controls.
The floor space ratio, height limit, design, and location of the proposed dwelling house is in compliance with the aforementioned provisions and entails minimal, if any, impact upon the adjoining C2 Conservation Zone. Therefore, Council is in support of the development.
H.5 – Development within Areas
The proposal does not involve any development within the immediate vicinity to or on adjoining boundaries of the listed bushland zones, therefore, this provision is not applicable to the development application.
H.6 – Location and Design of Development
The provisions for the location and design of the proposed development are summarised below:
· H.6 (a) – Location
The provisions for the location of the development aim to:
· Maximise the retention of local indigenous plants; and
· Maximise the protection of native fauna habitat and natural features
The subject site contains a total of 20 trees that are a combination of native indigenous plants and exotic species. The specific trees that are to be removed in order to allow for the development (1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 21) were categorised as ‘low landscape significant value’, suggesting the tree is either small in size or have poor structural conditions. Therefore, their removal is not envisaged to create adverse impacts in respect to sites habitat and natural features.
Tree 1 (Weeping Bottlebrush) and Tree 2 (Weeping Bottlebrush) are prioritised for retention and are to be replanted on site. Further to this, replacement involving healthy advanced size specimens reduces the loss of amenity within a short to medium timeframe, ensuring the offset of any vegetation loss on site.
The proposed works are within the SRZs of Trees 5, 18 & 19 and the TPZs of Trees 4 & 17 and represents a Major Encroachment (as defined by AS4970). However, the presence of existing structures and the tree sensitive construction methods and protection measures, outlined in L & Co Consultancy’ arboricultural report and the recommended conditions, allows for the retention of these trees and the works are considered acceptable. The objectives of bushland protection are met with regard to the location of the proposed development.
H.6 (b) – Building Design and Visual Impact
The provisions for the building design and visual impact of the development aim to:
· Changes to existing structures and proposed structures shall have regard to the existing level of views of the bushland from adjoining and nearby properties and the impact on those views should be minimised; and
· Proposed buildings and structures are to be designed and orientated so that a reasonable level of sun access is maintained to the adjoining bushland throughout the year so and no adverse effects occur
Comment: The visual impact assessment completed by Deneb Design illustrates the negligible impacts on outlooks, foreshore views and view sharing points experienced from the surrounding properties at 27, 38 and 42 Arabella Street, Longueville. As mentioned previously in the report, the four principles of Tenacity are utilised to analyse the level of visual impact;
· The assessment of views affected;
· The part of the property they are obtained;
· The extent of impact; and
· The reasonableness of the proposal
The views and outlooks to the bushland area from the adjoining properties at 38 and 42 Arabella Street are considered acceptable. The views from the primary habitable rooms such as the upper-level balcony, living room, kitchen and lower-level master bedroom at 38 Arabella Street are all substantially maintained. The envelope of the proposed design is located directly South of this site, and also entails a rear setback that ensures the equity of views. Subsequently, there would be minimal visual impact to the adjoining bushland and C2 zone from 38 Arabella Street. The property at 42 Arabella Street would experience similar conditions, however, the building line of the dwelling house sits approximately 5.1m behind the line of the proposed. Despite this, the level of impact that this has on the views east towards the bushland are minimal in their degree. The outlook that is obscured by the envelope is the northern residential area of Longueville that consists of dwelling houses and apartments – not any iconic or bushland views.
The proposed development measures a height of 8.71m that is below the 9.5m height development standard stipulated within the LEP. Subsequently, the bulk and scale of envelope would create minimal overshadowing to the eastern portion of the site. With the bushland area located mostly directly to the east, the overshadowing would not extend past the eastern boundary, nor would it come close to the vicinity of the bushland area. In summary, the building design successfully mitigates major visual impacts and is supported by Council.
H.7 – Preparation of a Landscape Plan for Building and Buffer Areas
The preparation of a landscape plan for building and buffer areas aims to include the following information;
a) All applications must include a Landscape Plan. Details of the plan must be in accordance with the policies and landscape guidelines of Council.
b) The Landscape Plan should indicate the proposed methods to be used during the construction and demolition period to protect those trees, bushland and other natural features required to be or conditioned to be retained. Retention of bushland elements in the buffer area is encouraged.
c) The use of local indigenous plants is required, and selected plant species should be of a type which is suited to the immediate landform and vegetation character of the surrounding bushland. A list of common indigenous plant species found in the Municipality of Lane Cove is found in Part J Landscaping.
d) The Landscape Plan should include details of local indigenous plants to be planted in the buffer area. Vegetation belts of local indigenous plants should be planted in the buffer area immediately down slope of any stormwater dispersal trench or absorption pit. These belts need to be at least the width of the stormwater devise and 2 metres deep.
e) All noxious weeds must be removed. A list of Noxious Plants in Lane Cove is included below. Environmental weeds and other invasive plants, including berry plants, should not be planted. A list of environmental weeds is included below.
Comment: The proposed development entails a sufficient buffer area of approximately 46.5m between the R2 residential site and the C2 environmental conservation area. This is measured to exceed the required 10m minimum by 36.5m. Within this area exists several species of significant indigenous vegetation that encompass high retention values. The scope of works does not extend to the location of these significant trees and natural features and therefore their retention is ensured. The significance of distance between the building area, in conjunction with the retainment of the significant trees in the buffer zone is considered satisfactory for building on the site adjoining bushland.
REFERRALS
Development Engineer
No objections subject to recommended draft conditions.
Tree Assessment Officer
- The proposal requests the removal of twelve (12) trees to accommodate construction of the proposal, with one (1) tree being located within the council verge at the front of the site. These trees have been assessed and confirmed by Council as being low value and not worthy as a material constraint to the development. These trees can be offset with compensatory replanting.
-
- Council notes major impacts into SRZ of adjoining trees but agrees with supplied Arborist report that existing site conditions and structures would have affected root development, with the proposed incursion acceptable under section 3.3.4 of the standard
-
- TPO Work Authority TRP211201723 dated 23/12/21 approved the removal of three (3) significant gum trees at the rear of the site adjoining bushland that died within a very short timeframe, consistent with herbicide application. Replacement trees stipulated within this consent have not been replanted. 3 x 400L Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) are to be conditioned to be replanted in recompense for the lost canopy and lost growth time.
- Added small tree fern (#21) for removal in location of proposed pool
No objections subject to recommended draft conditions.
Bushland Officer
Environmental Protection
· The property adjoins C2 Conservation Bushland at Woodford Bay reserve to the southeast at the rear end of the property. DCP Part H Bushland Protection stipulates a 10m bushland buffer is required to be applied at the rear boundary for adequate bushland protection.
· The bushland consists of Coastal Sandstone Foreshore Forest.
· Noted that the property is not within an Environmental Protection Area.
· I am satisfied that the proposal has left a sufficient bushland buffer.
Native Vegetation
· Noted that Trees 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15 & 16 are proposed for removal.
· I am satisfied for the proposed removal of tree 3 Syzygium sp. Although a native species it has scored poor for health and structural rating. I recommend that a 3-meter tree selected from the Council’s approved landscape list (DCP appendix 1 Part J) of recommended plantings is used to replace this tree and is incorporated into the landscape plan.
· I am not satisfied with the proposed removal of trees 14 and 15 Cyathea Australias as they complement the adjacent bushland at Woodford Bay reserve, I recommend that these 2 tree ferns be transplanted elsewhere on site.
· I am satisfied for the removal of trees 6, 7 ,8 ,9, 10, 11, 12 & 16 as they are of exotic species and do not complement the adjacent bushland vegetation.
· Noted that trees 4, 5, 13, 17, 18 & 19 were located on adjacent properties. All trees on adjacent properties are allocated a Retention Value of Priority for Retention.
· The majority of plants selected in the landscape plan are exotics that will cause environmental issues if escaped into the adjacent bushland. The planting schedule is to be revised with native plants selected from the Council’s approved landscape list DCP Part J appendix 1.
Stormwater, Erosion Protection and Sediment Control Plan
- Noted that the stormwater is to be discharged into the rear yard using a spreader system. However, the spreader system is proposed to be directly on top of T40 which has not been mentioned in the arborist report. Also, T41 is in the path of the spreader system, this tree is also not mentioned in the arborist report. T40 and T41 are only mentioned in the landscape plan as “existing trees no longer on site”.
- Further clarification needed on where discharge point is as there are trees in the discharge path.
- Further assessment of trees beyond the site outside of the proposed building area.
General Comments
- The landscape plan’s planting schedule is to be revised with native plants selected from Council’s approved landscaping list appendix 1 of the LCC DCP Part J Landscape 2010
- Tree 3 Syzygium sp. is to be replaced with a 3-meter tree selected from the Council’s approved landscaping list of recommended plantings. This tree is to be incorporated into the revised landscape plan.
- Trees 14 and 15 Cyathea Australias are to be transplanted elsewhere on site and incorporated into the landscape plan.
No objections subject to recommended draft conditions.
Lane Cove LOCAL Environmental Plan 2009 (Section 4.15(1)(a))
The proposal is permissible, complies with the development standards for Floor Space Ratio and height and does not raise any issues in regard to the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009.
Other Planning Instruments
SEPP (Resilience and Hazards) 2021
The subject site and adjoining sites are zoned for residential purposes, however, are located within Coastal Environmental Areas. Given the types of uses permissible within the residential zones, it is unlikely that the site would be contaminated. Despite this, due to the proximity to the coastal environment as well as the significance of excavation present in the proposal, the development is assessed against Clause 2.3, Clause 2.10 and Clause 2.11 of Resilience and Hazards SEPP.
Clause 2.3 – Zone Objectives and Land Use Table
The objectives of the R2 Zone are:
· To provide for the housing needs of the community within a low-density residential environment.
· To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.
· To retain, and where appropriate improve, the existing residential amenity of a detached single family dwelling area.
· To encourage new dwelling houses or extensions of existing dwelling houses that are not highly visible when viewed from the Lane Cove River or Parramatta River.
· To ensure that landscaping is maintained and enhanced as a major element in the residential environment.
The proposed two-storey dwelling house development is located within an R2 residential zone and successfully ascertains the standards and objectives listed within the Clause 2.3. The development ensures the improvement of amenity for the subject site and its future occupants. Despite the visual appearance of a four-storey dwelling house from the south-eastern elevation, the mitigation of any visual impacts is achieved through the adjacent C2 environmental conservation area. The adjoining C2 zone is a protected area that is comprised of a high density of native and non-native vegetation species. The height, location, and density of these species act as a visual buffer to the development, obscuring potential onlooking views from Woodford Bay and the greater Lane Cove River. Further to the point, it has been conditioned that the replacement planting and vegetative screening is to be implemented to the rear of the site, thus contributing to the health of the adjoining C2 zone and the viability of the mitigation of views from Woodford Bay. Therefore, it is considered that the aforementioned aspects listed meet the requirements of the objectives of the R2 residential land use.
2.10 Development on land within the coastal environment area
(1) Development consent must not be granted to development on land that is within the coastal environment area unless the consent authority has considered whether the proposed development is likely to cause an adverse impact on the following -
(a) the integrity and resilience of the biophysical, hydrological (surface and groundwater) and ecological environment, and
Comment: The development does not constrain the integrity of the biophysical, hydrological or ecological environment. The following aspects of the design and landscaping ensure the mitigation of potential impacts to the biosphere;
- The existing drainage patterns present on site would be primarily retained. The site consists of a steep slope from the Western corner at RL39.55 to the Eastern corner at RL7.12, excavation is required for the development. Despite this, the extent of the angle ensures that the existing drainage patterns would not be adversely altered.
- The vegetation species that are to be removed are considered ‘low landscape value’ and their removal would be mitigated through a replanting ratio of 1:1. This would ensure that the health of the ecological environment is maintained beyond construction and into occupation.
(b) coastal environmental values and natural coastal processes,
Comment: There would be no effects on the coastal environment or natural processes as a result of the proposal. Potential impacts caused by the level of excavation would be nullified by the significant distance between the altered ground area and the foreshore.
(c) The water quality of the marine estate (within the meaning of the Marine Estate Management Act 2014), in particular, the cumulative impacts of the proposed development on any of the sensitive coastal lakes identified in Schedule 1,
Comment: The proposed development is not located within the immediate vicinity of the marine estate of Woodford Bay. Between the subject site and the marine estate is a highly vegetated C2 area which acts as a natural buffer zone for any stormwater runoff that may enter into Woodford Bay. Therefore, the construction of a two-storey dwelling house is not expected to create adverse impacts on the quality of the marine estate.
(d) marine vegetation, native vegetation and fauna and their habitats, undeveloped headlands and rock platforms,
Comment: The proposal does not incorporate any potential alteration to the foreshore boundary that adjoins to Woodford Bay. Ultimately, all major vegetation, fauna and rock platforms that may be present on site would be retained to sustain the biological health of the subject site and surrounding ecosystem.
(e) existing public open space and safe access to and along the foreshore, beach, headland or rock platform for members of the public, including persons with a disability,
Comment: The subject site does not entail any public open space or direct access to the foreshore; therefore, the provision is not applicable in this instance.
(f) Aboriginal cultural heritage, practices, and places
Comment: The subject site does not contain any Aboriginal cultural heritage or artefacts, nor are any located within the vicinity.
Clause 2.11 Development on land within the Coastal Use Area
Chapter 2.11 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 (SEPP R&H 2021) provides a coordinated approach to lane use planning in coastal use areas consistent with the Coastal Management Act 2016. The clause examines the bulk, scale, and size of developments within coastal use areas and aims to mitigate potential impacts on the surrounding environments. The entirety of the subject site is located within this area and is therefore assessed against the following clauses of the SEPP;
(1) Development consent must not be granted to development on land that is within the coastal use area unless the consent authority
(a) has considered whether the proposed development is likely to cause an adverse impact on the following—
(i) existing, safe access to and along the foreshore, beach, headland, or rock platform for members of the public, including persons with a disability,
Comment: The proposed development does not have any impact upon the public access.
(ii) overshadowing, wind funneling and the loss of views from public places to foreshores,
Comment: The proposed development meets the provisions of bulk and scale which in turn, allows neighbouring properties to receive the required access to direct sunlight. Further, the loss of views from properties at 27, 38 and 42 Arabella Street is considered reasonable. This has been substantiated previously in the report through the application of the Tenacity principles.
(iii) the visual amenity and scenic qualities of the coast, including coastal headlands,
Comment: As mentioned previously in the report through the utilisation of the Tenacity principles, there would be negligible visual amenity impacts.
(iv) Aboriginal cultural heritage, practices, and places,
Comment: The subject site is not identified as containing Aboriginal cultural heritage, practices, or places.
(v) cultural and built environment heritage, and
Comment: The subject site is not identified as containing cultural or built environment heritage.
SEPP (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021
The subject site is situated within a ‘Foreshores and Waterways Area’. The proposal is assessed against Part 6.28, Division 3 – Development in Foreshore and Waterways Areas as follows;
Development in Foreshores and Waterways Area – 6.28 General (2)(e)
(1) In deciding whether to grant development consent to development in the Foreshores and Waterways Area, the consent authority must consider the following;
(a) whether the development is consistent with the following principles—
(i) Sydney Harbour is a public resource, owned by the public, to be protected for the public good,
(ii) the public good has precedence over the private good,
(iii) the protection of the natural assets of Sydney Harbour has precedence over all other interests,
(b) whether the development will promote the equitable use of the Foreshores and Waterways Area,
Comment: The subject site and proposed development entails no direct link or relationship to the foreshore and waterways area.
(c) whether the development will have an adverse impact on the Foreshores and Waterways Area,
Comment: As substantiated in previous sections of this report, the development does not adversely impact upon amenities of the site related to the foreshore areas such as the biological health of the ecosystem, the views and outlooks of neighbouring properties, the existing vegetation, natural assets or the general biodiversity and conservation.
(e) whether the development will minimise risk to the development from rising sea levels or changing flood patterns as a result of climate change,
Comment: The proposed development is not a risk to the potentials of rising sea levels or changing flood patterns.
(f) whether the development will protect or reinstate natural intertidal foreshore areas, natural landforms and native vegetation,
Comment: The subject site does not directly adjoin to the natural foreshore area and is therefore not assessed against this component. As outlined in the landscape plan, the proposal seeks to retain all high priority vegetation and in cases where removal is imminent, the condition of relocation or replanting is input. The protection of the natural landforms and native vegetation is ensured.
(g) whether the development protects or enhances terrestrial and aquatic species, populations and ecological communities, including by avoiding physical damage to or shading of aquatic vegetation,
Comment: The proposal does not entail any direct relationship to terrestrial/aquatic species and would not overshadow any aquatic vegetation.
(h) whether the development will protect, maintain or rehabilitate watercourses, wetlands, riparian lands, remnant vegetation and ecological connectivity.
Comment: Between the subject site and the marine estate is a highly vegetated C2 area which acts as a natural buffer zone for any stormwater runoff that may enter into Woodford Bay. It is envisioned that the natural watercourses present on site would be minimally affected by the proposed development. As a result, potential impacts caused by the level of excavation are nullified by the significant distance between the altered ground area and the foreshore and the natural watercourses are ultimately maintained. The provision has been satisfied.
The proposed development satisfies the matters listed within Section 6.28 of the Biodiversity and Conservation SEPP of 2021. The proposal ultimately seeks to improve the architectural design of the dwelling house and in doing so, successfully maintain the natural assets without compromising the health of the surrounding foreshore or neighbouring sites.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 indicates that the standards for demolition and removal of materials should meet with AS 2601-2001 and therefore any consent will require the application of a relevant condition seeking compliance with the Standard.
Variations to Council’s Codes/PolicIes (seCTIONS 4.15(1)(a), (1)(b), and (1)(c))
The preceding policy assessment table identifies those controls that the proposal does not comply with. Each of the departures are listed, discussed, and assessed against the relevant provisions below:
No. |
Proposed |
Control |
Comment |
Council support |
1 |
7.2m |
7m wall height (max) (max parapet of 600mm) |
The proposed wall height is at 7.2m, breaching the 7m provision by 200mm. The non-compliance incurs negligible impacts. |
Yes |
2 |
6.1m |
1m cut and fill (max) |
The proposed cut and fill of 6.1m is in exceedance of the 1m provision by 5.1m. The excavation is considered necessary for the development and no adverse impacts incur as a result. |
Yes |
3 |
4.6m |
1.8m swimming pool height (max) (steeply sloping sites) |
The proposed swimming pool sits 4.6m above the existing ground level. This is 2.8m above the maximum. No adverse impacts apply. |
Yes |
The alterations and additions seeks approval for the variation of 3 provisions within the LDCP 2009, particularly, Part C Clause 1.7.1(a) Maximum Wall Height, Part C Clause 1.6 Cut and Fill, and Part C Clause 1.10.1 Private Swimming Pools, as previously assessed. This section identifies the controls in which the development would not comply with. The following measures ensure the mitigation of any potential impacts of the departures:
Part C Clause 1.7.1(a) Maximum Wall Height
Part C1.7.1(d) specifies a maximum wall height of 7m above the existing ground level. The development proposes a height of 7.2m, approximately 200mm in exceedance of the control. This height breach is a result of the ground floor wall located on the southern elevation at the living room. The variation is considered minor because;
- Despite the numerical noncompliance, the 200mm variation would not create unreasonable impacts on overshadowing or building envelope; and
- The wall, in totality, achieves reasonable and equitable view sharing and inter-allotment privacy arrangements between the subject site and 42 Arabella Street
Part C Clause 1.6 Cut and Fill
Part C 1.6 stipulates a maximum cut and fill 1m across the subject site. The development however presents a total excavation of approximately 6.1m, thus exceeding the provision by 5.1m. The extent of excavation is considered reasonable to allow for a levelled area on a steeply sloping site. The maximum excavation occurs at the Lower Ground Floor 03 recreation room. The variation is considered minor because;
- The existing site has a significant slope from RL39.47 at the front of the existing house to RL30.67 at the area of the pool. The 8.8m difference in site levels is difficult to construct upon and therefore, excavation is a requirement.
- The predominance of the major excavation works occurs within the proposed building footprint;
- Approximately 50% of the site is untouched by any alteration to the existing landscape. This area towards the C2 zone is retained, thus, maintaining the environmental health of the vegetation, waterways and water run off routes.
- The cut and fill along the subject site’s boundaries is considered necessary for reasonable accessways; and
- The streetscape appearance of the proposed development is as a single storey dwelling house. No excavation is proposed towards the boundary adjoining Arabella Street, therefore, maintaining a consistent relationship between the development and the existing streetscape.
Part C Clause 1.10.1 Private Swimming Pools
Part C 1.10.1 Private Swimming Pools states that any ancillary development (swimming pool) must not exceed a total height of 1.8m above the existing ground level that it is located on. The proposed pool exceeds the provision by 2.8m with a total height 4.6m above the existing ground level. The variation is considered minor because;
- Given the significant topographical decline present on site, the proposed pool extends a reasonable width that does not create an excessive scale of difference between the pools proposed ground height and the existing ground height below;
- The design of the pool features stepped planter boxes that minimises the visual impact of the retaining wall and successfully blends the ancillary development into the landscape below;
- The two mature ferns located where the pool is intended to be constructed have been conditioned to be maintained and relocated elsewhere onsite, therefore, creating minimal impact on existing vegetation.
Consequently, the variations of the 3 aforementioned provisions within the LDCP is considered permissible as they carry minor impacts upon the amenity of the subject site and the adjoining properties.
RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION (Section 4.15(1)(d))
Concern |
Comment |
Concerns for the impacts resultant of the designs bulk and scale |
The amended plans have addressed previous concerns of the 9.5m maximum height variation that contributed to issues with bulk and scale. The height was reduced and thus so was the bulk. Further, the non-compliance of the balcony depth was reduced to 3m to prevent any incursion on views from 38 Arabella Street. In this regard, the design meets the provisions requirements and is supported. |
Concerns for the exceedance of gross floor area |
The development is below the FSR development standard. |
Concerns for the rear building line |
As previously state, the amended plans address the variation of the balcony depth to ensure a maximum depth of 3m. This prevents the obstruction of the southern views experienced from 38 Arabella Street. The development meets the provisions of the rear setback and building line. |
Concerns for the views from the waterway (Woodford Bay) |
The height and location of the C2 environmental area between the foreshore and the site acts as a visual buffer to the development, preventing potential visual impacts from Woodford Bay and the greater Lane Cove River. It is not substantiated that the development would be visibly dominant from the Bay area, park, or reserve. |
Concerns for the incursion of privacy caused by the north facing windows |
The 1.5m side setback requirement is adhered to in the proposal. Further, floor to ceiling privacy screening in the form of timber battening has been provided for all north windows to ensure that the subject development achieves natural northern light whilst maintaining privacy to the adjoining property. Strict requirement of the details, angles, and measurements of the privacy screen have been conditioned to ensure that privacy standards are met. |
Concerns for the extent of excavation |
The protection of neighbouring sites is ensured as substantiated within the submitted geotechnical report. The proposed excavations prevents the need for gross floor area to be transferred to the ground and lower ground levels – ultimately reducing the bulk and scale of the development. Although the extent of excavation is numerically non-compliant, the merit of the excavation is reasonable. All excavation is to be carried out in strict accordance with relevant standards to ensure compliance. |
Concerns for the exceedance of the front setback requirement |
The entry vestibule stated to be in exceedance of the provision is not enclosed area and is therefore not included in the front setback calculation. The 7.795m setback meets the requirements. |
Concerns for overshadowing |
The overshadowing that would occur as a result of the development is minimal in comparison to the overshadowing created by the envelope of the existing dwelling house. The windows that receive less than 2 hours of direct sunlight are not adversely impacted by the proposed envelope. Further, Northern light and solar access is in fact improved in the afternoon hours and is considered compliant. |
Concerns regarding the ridge height affecting views |
The total ridge height of RL43.870 is considered reasonable when assess in conjunction with the maximum building height. The total height is below the maximum LEP building height standard. The view loss would be negligible as substantiated by the view impact assessment submitted with the amended plans. |
Concerns for the potential obstruction of views as a result of a proposed tree |
The potential impacts on views created by the proposed tree is not substantiated. |
The concerns raised by the objections from the adjoining properties of 27, 38, and 42 Arabella Street have been addressed within the amended plans and supporting documentation. It is considered that the predominance of provisions stipulated within the LEP and DCP have been successfully met and in turn, would ensure the protection of amenity of the subject site, surrounding environment and adjoining properties.
CONCLUSION
The matters in relation to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 have been satisfied.
The application meets with the Floor Space Ratio and Height development standards as required in the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009 and generally meets with the Part C Residential Development Objectives in the Lane Cove Development Control Plan.
On balance the proposed development would be reasonable and therefore is recommended for approval.
General Conditions
That pursuant to Section 4.16(1)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Council grants development consent to: · Development Application DA23/26 · For the demolition of an existing two storey dwelling and construction of a two-storey dwelling house including an internal 4 car-stacker garage and a swimming pool. · On 40 Arabella Street, Longueville - subject to the following conditions:
PART A – GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. A.1 - Approved plans Development must be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans (stamped by Council), except where the conditions of this consent expressly require otherwise.
In the event of any inconsistency between the approved plans and a condition of this consent, the condition prevails.
Reason: To ensure all parties are aware of the approved plans and supporting documentation that applies to the development.
2. A.2 - Design amendments Before the issue of a construction certificate, the certifier must ensure the approved construction certificate plans (and specifications) detail the following required amendments to the approved plans and supporting documentation stamped by Council.
Planning Officer Amendment:
· 1:50 detail of the northern elevation privacy screen is to be provided prior to construction to ensure the angle, width of battens and gaps between obscure any overlooking between the subject development and the adjoining property of 38 Arabella Street.
Bushland Officer Amendments:
· Tree 14 and Tree 14 (two mature fern trees) shown in the amended landscape plan prepared by Studio IZ are to be transplanted to the south-east section of the site to compliment the adjacent bushland at Woodford Bay reserve. The transplant is to be shown in the revised landscape plan. - · Tree 3 Syzygium sp. Shown in the amended landscape plan prepared by Studio IZ is to be replaced with a 3-meter tree selected from the Council’s approved landscaping list of recommended plantings (LCC DCP appendix 1 Part J). This tree is to be incorporated into the revised landscape plan. - · The sediment control plan is to include the following amendments; - - The use of 2500mm long metal star pickets hammered into the ground 500mm deep (leaving 2000mm above ground) with 1000mm centres (spacing between each star picket). - Metal wire threaded through each star picket to assist in taking the sediment load between the centers. - Use of self-supporting geo textile semi permeable fabric allowing water to pass through but catching sediment. - Geo textile semi permeable fabric to be installed 300mm deep into the ground and 1500mm above ground attached to star pickets and wire. - A secondary sediment fence to be installed following the specifications as above 2000mm behind the first fence creating a secondary barrier. - A clear marking on the amended sediment control plan of the discharge path and discharge point
Tree Officer Amendments:
· Three (3) 400L Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) trees are to be replanted in recompense for the removal of three (3) significant gum trees at the rear of the site adjoining bushland that died within a very short timeframe, consistent with herbicide application (TPO Work Authority TRP211201723 dated 23/12/21 approved)
Reason: To require minor amendments to the approved plans and supporting documentation following assessment of the development.
3. A.3 - Payment of security deposits Before the commencement of any works on the site, or the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant must make the following payments to Council and provide written evidence of these payments to the Certifier:
The payments will be used for the cost of:
· making good any damage caused to any council property (including street trees) as a consequence of carrying out the works to which the consent relates, · completing any public work such as roadwork, kerbing and guttering, footway construction, stormwater drainage and environmental controls, required in connection with this consent, and
Note: The inspection fee includes Council’s fees and charges and includes the Public Road and Footpath Infrastructure Inspection Fee (under the Roads Act 1993). The amount payable must be in accordance with council’s fees and charges at the payment date.
Note: Council inspection fees are calculated in accordance with Council’s fees and charges at the payment date. Note: Required Council inspections for civil works involving Council assets are to be carried out prior to the pouring of any concrete (formwork) and on completion of the construction. An initial site meeting is to be conducted with council and the contractor prior to the commencement of any of the above works to allow for discussion of Council construction / set out requirements. The following items are to be inspected: · proposed stormwater drainage improvements; · proposed stormwater connection to existing Council pit in the street; · all footpath, kerb/gutter and landscaping works; and · any adjustment works in Council’s Road reserve.
Reason: To ensure any damage to public infrastructure is rectified and public works can be completed.
4. A.4 - Payment of building and construction industry long service levy Before the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant is to ensure that the person liable pays the long service levy of $5,050.00 as calculated at the date of this consent to the Long Service Corporation or Council under section 34 of the Building and Construction Industry Long Service Payments Act 1986 and provides proof of this payment to the principal certifier.
Reason: To ensure the long service levy is paid.
5. A.7.L - Tree preservation and approved landscaping works The protection of trees in Lane Cove is regulated under the State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 (SEPP) parts 2.2 and 2.3 which prohibits the clearing of vegetation without the authority conferred by a permit granted by Council. Clearing under the SEPP is defined as:
a) cut down, fell, uproot, kill, poison, ringbark, burn, or otherwise destroy the vegetation, or
b) lop or otherwise remove a substantial part of the vegetation.
The clearing of trees or vegetation protected by the regulation is an offence against the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).
The maximum penalty that may be imposed in respect to any such offence is $1,100,000 per individual and $5, 500,000 per corporation.
The following trees shall be retained:
This consent gives approval for the removal of the following trees:
This consent gives approval to carry out the following works in Tree Protection Zones:
Tree removal may only occur upon issue of a Construction Certificate.
Reason: To ensure the protection of trees to be retained and to confirm trees removed for pruning/removal.
6. A.9.T - Works on Council land A separate application shall be made to Council’s Urban Services Division for any associated works on Council property. Written approval is to be obtained prior to the start of any works on Council property.
Reason: To manage impacts to Council’s assets.
7. A.10.E - Drainage plan amendments Before the issue of a construction certificate, the certifier must ensure the approved construction certificate plans (and specifications) detail the following required amendments to the approved stormwater drainage plans:
1. This DA requires 12000 litre of rainwater tank. The detailed design for this proposed system is required 2. Proposed drainage system should show pipe sizes and invert levels up to the connection point; confirming pipe system satisfies part O of Council’ storm water DCP. 3. The stormwater requirements shown in Basix certificate shall be included in stormwater management plan and satisfied. 4. Clean out pits are required at all low points of charged drainage line if charged pipe system is proposed. 5. Sediment control fence shall be placed around the construction site and shown in plan 6. Subsoil seepage agg-line drainage is required around proposed garage front wall, lower ground front wall and retaining wall or as it is necessary and connected to proposed drainage system 7. The proposed connection pit at start of dispersal trench shall be modified into a pollution control pit (as shown in section 3.4.1 in part O of Council’s stormwater DCP) with mesh (RH3030) and sump(300mm minimum). These details shall be shown in plan. 8. Minimum of 1.8m height difference is required between start and end of the charged pipe system as per section 5.1 in Council DCP if charged system is used. The details of design level difference shall be shown in plan. 9. The proposed rainwater reuse system with a minimum effective capacity of 12,000 litres and to be installed in accordance with Section 7.3 in Council’s Stormwater DCP and relevant Australian standards. This tank shall have 100mm air gap on top and 100mm sludge zone at the bottom. 10. Only roof water shall be connected to rainwater tank. 11. The rainwater tank shall show top water level, overflow path detail, pump system and dimensions. 12. The proposed basement shall be constructed with water-proof walls around it. 13. For properties adjacent to bushland approval is required from Council’s Coordinator Bushland on the design of the dispersal system to ensure the health and vitality of trees and vegetation are retained. 14. The installation of the dispersal trench shall be parallel to existing contour lines. 15. The proposed dispersal system shall be moved down stream side of the building and pool by minimum 3.0m and shall be marked in stormwater plan as per section 5.2 of Council DCP. In this case, the arborist report shall be amended covering all trees around the dispersal trench area 16. The dispersal trench shall be similar to the typical section shown in Appendix 7 in part O of Council’s stormwater DCP and comply with Part H of Council’s Bushland protection DCP 17. Installation of pipe system and dispersal trench near the protected trees must be assessed by Council Tree Officer
Certification from a suitably qualified engineer as to the matters below is to be provided to the Principal Certifying Authority, prior to the issue of any CC:
a) Compliance with the amendments detailed in this condition. b) Compliance with Part O: Stormwater Management of Council’s DCP.
Where a variation is sought, written approval is to be obtained from Council’s Urban Services Division.
Reason: To ensure adequate stormwater management in accordance with Council’s DCP.
8. A.12 – Construction Certificate The submission of a Construction Certificate and its issue by Council or Principal Certifier PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK commencing.
Reason: To ensures the detailed construction plans and specifications comply with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia (BCA) and any relevant Australian Standard.
9. A.13 – Swimming pool fence A swimming pool fence is to comply with the following: a) That forms a barrier between the swimming pool; and i. any residential building or movable dwelling situated on the premises; and ii. any place (whether public or private) adjacent to or adjoining the premises; and b) That is designed, constructed and installed in accordance with the standards as prescribed by the Regulations under the Swimming Pools Act, 1992, and the Australian Standard AS1926 – 2012, “Swimming Pool Safety”.
SUCH FENCE IS TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE THE FILLING OF THE SWIMMING POOL.
ADVICE: In accordance with the Swimming Pools Amendment Act 2012, the swimming pool or spa is required to be registered on the NSW Government State wide Swimming Pool Register when completed. The register can be found at www.swimmingpoolregister.nsw.gov.au.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
10. A.15 – Pool filter and pump The filter and pump are to be located in a soundproof enclosure. If noise generated as a result of the development results in an offensive noise Council, may prohibit the use of the unit, under the provisions of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997.
Reason: Statutory requirement.
11. A.16 – Pool warning notice In accordance with the requirements of the Swimming Pools Act 1992 and Regulations thereunder a warning notice is to be displayed in a prominent position in the immediate vicinity of the swimming pool at all times.
The notice must be in accordance with the standards of the Australian Resuscitation Council for instructional posters and resuscitation techniques and must contain a warning "YOUNG CHILDREN SHOULD BE SUPERVISED WHEN USING THIS POOL".
Reason: Statutory requirement.
12. A.17 – Special Condition – Prepurchase of Replacement Trees The applicant is to provide receipt of pre purchased trees from a registered nursery that will attain the prescribed height of replacement trees as part of this consent. Purchased trees must also be of the nominated pot size conditioned as part of this consent. The receipt is to be provided to Council’s Landscape and Tree department prior to the issue of a construction certificate. Purchased trees are to be grown in accordance with specifications outlined within AS2303:2018 Tree Stock for Landscape Use.
Reason: To ensure replacement trees are at appropriate size upon completion of the development.
PART B – PRIOR TO DEMOLITION WORKS
13. B.1.T - Demolition Traffic Management Plan As a result of the site constraints, limited vehicle access and parking, a demolition traffic management plan (DTMP) and report shall be prepared by a Transport for NSW accredited person and submitted to and approved by Council prior to commencing any demolition work. The DTMP must:- a) Make provision for all construction materials to be stored on site, at all times. b) Specify construction truck routes and truck rates. Nominated truck routes are to be distributed over the surrounding road network where possible. c) Provide for the movement of trucks to and from the site, and deliveries to the site. Temporary truck standing/ queuing locations in a public roadway/ domain in the vicinity of the site is not permitted unless a Works Zone is approved by Council. d) Include a Traffic Control Plan prepared by an RMS accredited ticket holder for any activities involving the management of vehicle and pedestrian traffic. e) Specify that a minimum seven (7) days notification must be provided to adjoining property owners prior to the implementation of any temporary traffic control measures. f) Include a site plan showing the location of any site sheds, location of requested Work Zones, anticipated use of cranes, structures proposed on the footpath areas (hoardings, scaffolding or temporary shoring) and extent of tree protection zones around Council Street trees. g) Take into consideration the combined construction activities of other development in the surrounding area. To this end, the consultant preparing the DTMP must engage and consult with developers undertaking major development works within a 250m radius of the subject site to ensure that appropriate measures are in place to prevent the combined impact of construction activities. These communications must be documented and submitted to Council prior to work commencing on site. h) Be prepared in accordance with relevant sections of Australian Standard 1742 – “Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices”, RMS’s Manual – “Traffic Control at Work Sites”.
Reason: To ensure public safety and minimise any impacts to the adjoining pedestrian and vehicular traffic systems.
14. B.2.E - Asbestos removal, handling and disposal The removal, handling, and disposal of asbestos from building sites shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Regulations. Details of the method of removal in accordance with this condition is to be submitted to the Principal Certifier and Council’s Environmental Health Section, prior to commencing any demolition works.
Reason: To ensure worker and public health and safety.
15. B.3.EH - Compliance with demolition standard Demolition of buildings and structures must comply with Australian Standard AS 2601—2001: The Demolition of Structures.
Reason: Prescribed condition under the EP&A Regulation 2021.
16. B.4.EH - Demolition work plan the name, address, contact details and licence number of the Demolisher / Asbestos Removal Contractor. - Details of hazardous materials (including asbestos). - Method/s of demolition (including removal of any asbestos). - Measures and processes to be implemented to ensure the health & safety of workers and community. - Measures to be implemented to minimise any airborne dust and asbestos. - Methods and location of disposal of any hazardous materials (including asbestos). - Other relevant details, measures and requirements to be implemented. - Details of re-use, recycling and disposal of waste materials. - Date the demolition works will commence.
Reason: To ensure health and safety.
17. B.13.L - Project Arborist Prior to the commencement of any works, including demolition, a Project Arborist of minimum Australian qualitative framework (AQF) Level 5 qualification, is to be appointed to oversee/monitor trees/condition compliance during the construction process. A letter of engagement must be provided to Council prior to issue of a construction certificate. Compliance certificates must be available upon request, submitted to the Principal Certifier within five days of site attendance and must be available to council immediately upon request prior to the issue of an occupation certificate; failure to produce the latest certificate will be considered a breach of conditions. Each compliance certificate must contain photographic evidence to confirm site attendance. A compliance certificate is required for each of the following phases.
The project Arborist shall: · Certify all tree protection measures listed within Part B prior to demolition works · Clearly identify and tag trees which are to be removed and which trees are to be retained as part of this consent · Oversee the demolition of the existing carport whilst retaining the existing retaining wall within the TPZ of trees 5, 18 and 19. · Oversee the excavation of stormwater and installation of landscape elements within the TPZ of Tree 13 · Oversee any excavation within the TPZ of T17 including proposed planting · Provide quarterly health and condition assessments on protected trees · Statement upon completion for the development that all retained trees have been maintained in a healthy, viable condition and replacement planting has been undertaken. The statement must also recommend remedial advice for trees post construction to mitigate and long-term construction impacts.
Reason: To ensure trees are protected and retained on the site.
18. B.14 – Special Condition – Tree Protection Measures Fencing The following tree protection measures must be in place prior to demolition works and certified by the project arborist.
Tree Protection Fencing must be installed within the following locations:
1. Along the area marked within the tree protection plan on page 32 of the Arborist Report by Laurence and Co. dated 13th March 2023
The fencing must consist of a 1.8 m high chain mesh fence held in place with concrete block footings and fastened together. An example of fencing is shown under figure 3 on page 16 of the Australian Standard 4970-2009 The Protection of Trees on Development. The fenced area shall not be used for the storage of building materials, machinery, site sheds, or for advertising and the soil levels within the fenced area shall remain undisturbed.
A waterproof sign must be placed on every second panel stating, ‘NO ENTRY TREE PROTECTION AREA – this fence and sign are not to be removed or relocated for the work duration.’ Minimum size of the sign is to be A3 portrait with NO ENTRY TREE PROTECTION ZONE in capital Arial Font size 100, and the rest of the text in Arial font size 65.
Such fencing and signage must be erected Prior to Demolition including site preparation and remain in place for the duration of the construction work
Movement of Tree Protection Fencing must be overseen and approved by the project Arborist with notification provided to Council’s Tree Management Officer in writing.
Reason: To protect the natural environment.
PART C - BEFORE THE ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
19. C.1 - Construction site management plan Prior to any demolition works and before the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant must ensure a construction site management plan is provided to and approved by the principal certifier. The plan must include the following matters: · location and materials for protective fencing and hoardings to the perimeter on the site. · provisions for public safety · pedestrian access, including disabled and pram access, is to be maintained throughout the course of the construction as per AS-1742.3, ’Part 3 - Traffic control devices for works on roads’ · pedestrian and vehicular site access points and construction activity zones · details of construction traffic management, including proposed truck movements to and from the site and estimated frequency of those movements, and measures to preserve pedestrian safety in the vicinity of the site. The construction traffic management plan shall comply with the requirements of Part R of Lane Cove DCP 2010 and shall be submitted to Council’s Traffic Section for written approval. Consultation with NSW Police, TfNSW, and Sydney Buses may be required. Note: Heavy vehicles are not permitted to travel on local roads without Council approval. · protective measures for on-site tree preservation (including in accordance with AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites and Council’s DCP, if applicable) and trees in adjoining public domain (if applicable) · For major works, appointment of a project arborist of minimum AQF Level 5 qualification to oversee/monitor tree(s) condition during the construction process. · details of any bulk earthworks to be carried out · location of site storage areas and sheds · equipment used to carry out all works · a garbage container with a tight-fitting lid · dust, noise and vibration control measures including a construction noise management plan prepared in accordance with the NSW EPA’s Interim Construction Noise Management Guidelines by an appropriately qualified acoustic consultant. · location of temporary toilets.
The applicant must ensure a copy of the approved construction site management plan is kept on-site at all times during construction.
Council Approvals 1. Where hoarding is required to be provided along the street frontage, a Hoarding Application is to be submitted to Council for approval. 2. Any construction plant on the public road reservation requires an approved “Application for standing plant permit”.
Additional Council Requirements 1. Stockpiles or soil shall not be located on / near any drainage lines or easements, natural watercourses or water bodies, footpath or roadway without first providing suitable protective measures adequate to protect these water bodies. 2. All stockpiles of contaminated materials must be stored in an environmentally sensitive manner in a secure area on the site and shall be suitably covered to prevent dust and odour nuisance.
Reason: To require details of measures that will protect the public, and the surrounding environment, during site works and construction.
20. C.2 - Erosion and sediment control plan Prior to any demolition works or clearing of any vegetation and before the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant is to ensure that an erosion and sediment control plan is prepared in accordance with the following documents before it is provided to and approved by the principal certifier:
· Council’s development control plan, · the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction Certificate’ (the Blue Book), and · the ‘Do it Right On-Site, Soil and Water Management for the Construction Industry' (Southern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils and the Natural Heritage Trust).
The applicant must ensure the erosion and sediment control plan is kept on- site at all times during site works and construction.
Reason: To ensure no substance other than rainwater enters the stormwater system and waterways
21. C.5 - Dilapidation report Before the issue of a construction certificate, a suitably qualified engineer must prepare a dilapidation report detailing the structural condition of adjoining buildings, structures or works, and public land, to the satisfaction of the certifier. If the engineer is denied access to any adjoining properties to prepare the dilapidation report, the report must be based on a survey of what can be observed externally and demonstrate, in writing, to the certifier’s satisfaction that all reasonable steps were taken to obtain access to the adjoining properties.
Reason: To establish and document the structural condition of adjoining properties and public land for comparison as building work progresses and is completed.
22. C.24.E - Structural engineer’s details The Construction Certificate plans and specifications must include detailed professional structural engineering plans and/or specifications for the following: · underpinning; · retaining walls; · footings; · reinforced concrete work; · structural work; · upper-level floor framing;
and where relevant in accordance with any recommendations contained in an approved geotechnical report.
Reason: To ensure structural adequacy.
23. C.25.E - Construction methodology report Where there are structures on neighbouring properties that are deemed to be in the zone of influence of the proposed excavations, a suitably qualified engineer must prepare a Construction Methodology Report demonstrating that the proposed excavation will have no adverse impact on any surrounding property and infrastructure.
The report must: · be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to issue of any Construction Certificate; · include a geotechnical report to determine the design parameters appropriate to the specific development and site; · include recommendations on appropriate construction techniques to ameliorate any potential adverse impacts. · this shall include traffic management plan as well as storage and manoeuvring areas, impacts on public assets and appropriate remedial works on Council assets.
The development works are to be undertaken in accordance with the recommendations of the Construction Methodology report.
Reason: To protect neighbouring buildings.
24. C.27.E - Proposed vehicular crossing The vehicular crossing servicing the property shall be constructed prior to the issue of the Occupation Certificate. The existing driveway shall be completely demolished and apart from the area of the new driveway shall be reinstated by standard kerb and gutter satisfying Council’s standard. The new driveway shall be designed and complied with Council’s standard drawing No: CIV.4.2, 3.1 and 3.2.
a) The proposed vehicular crossing shall be constructed to the specifications and levels issued by Council. The applicant has to lodge Vehicular Crossing Application form and pay application fee as shown in this form to get these levels. This shall be done prior to Construction Certificate.
b) The driveway opening width along at the face of kerb is to be no wider than 5.5.
c) The driveway shall be setback a minimum 300mm away from any existing power pole and stormwater pit.
d) Certification is to be provided by a suitably qualified engineer demonstrating compliance with AS 2890 Series including AS 2890.1.2004 “Off Street Car Parking”, and Council's standards and specifications.
e) The excavation for driveway near Council tree and construction shall satisfy Council’s Tree preservation Officer.
f) The following plans shall be prepared and certified by a suitably qualified engineer:
· Longitudinal sections along the extreme wheel paths of the driveway/access ramp at a scale of 1:20 demonstrating compliance with the scraping provisions of AS2890.1. The sections shall include details of all levels and grades, including those levels stipulated at boundary levels, both existing and proposed from the centre line of the roadway through to the parking area clearly demonstrating that the driveway complies with Australian Standards 2890.1-2004 - Off Street Car Parking. · Transitional grades in accordance with AS2890. If a gradient in excess of 25% is proposed, the engineer must certify that this design is safe and environmentally sustainable · Sections showing the clearance to the underside of any overhead structure complies with the clearance provisions of AS2890.1.
A ‘Construction of Residential Vehicular Footpath Crossing’ application, design and certification shall be submitted to the Principal Certifying Authority prior to the issue of the Construction Certificate. All works associated with construction of the crossing shall be completed prior to the issue of any Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure the proposed vehicular crossing complies with Australian Standards and Council’s requirements.
PART D - BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF BUILDING WORK
25. D.1 - Erosion and sediment controls in place Before the commencement of any site or building work, the principal certifier must be satisfied the erosion and sediment controls in the erosion and sediment control plan, (as approved by the principal certifier) are in place until the site is rectified (at least 70% ground cover is achieved over any bare ground on site).
Reason: To ensure runoff and site debris do not impact local stormwater systems and waterways.
26. D.3 - Signs on site A sign must be erected in a prominent position on any site on which building work or demolition work is being carried out: a) showing the name, address and telephone number of the principal certifier for the work; and b) showing the name of the principal contractor (if any) for any building work and a telephone number on which that person may be contacted outside working hours; and c) stating that unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited. Any such sign is to be maintained while any demolition or building work is being carried out but must be removed when these works have been completed.
Note: This does not apply in relation to building work, or demolition work, that is carried out inside an existing building that does not affect the external walls of the building.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 70 of the EP&A Regulation 2021.
27. D.4 - Compliance with the Home Building Act In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any building work authorised to be carried out by the consent commences.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 69 of the EP&A Regulation 2021.
28. D.5 - Home Building Act requirements Residential building work within the meaning of the Home Building Act 1989 must not be carried out unless the principal certifier for the development to which the work relates (not being Council) has given Council written notice of the following information — a) In the case of work for which a principal contractor is required to be appointed - i) the name and licence number of the principal contractor, and ii) the name of the insurer by which the work is insured under Part 6 of that Act, b) In the case of work to be done by an owner-builder— i) the name of the owner-builder, and c) if the owner-builder is required to hold an owner-builder permit under that Act, the number of the owner-builder permit.
If arrangements for doing the residential building work are changed while the work is in progress so that the information notified becomes out of date, further work must not be carried out unless the principal certifier for the development to which the work relates (not being the Council) has given Council written notice of the updated information.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 71 EP&A Regulation 2021.
29. D.6 - Notice regarding dilapidation report Before the commencement of any site or building work, the principal certifier must ensure the adjoining building owner(s) is provided with a copy of the dilapidation report for their properties no less than 10 days before the commencement of any site or building works and provide a copy of the report to Council at the same time.
Reason: To advise neighbours and Council of any dilapidation report.
PART E - WHILE BUILDING WORK IS BEING CARRIED OUT
30. E.1 - Hours of work
The principal certifier must ensure that building work, demolition or vegetation removal is only carried out between: Monday to Friday (inclusive) 7.00am to 5.30pm Saturday 7.00am to 4.00pm
With NO high noise generating activities, to be undertaken after 12 Noon on Saturday.
All demolition, building construction work, including earthworks, deliveries of building materials to and from the site to be restricted as follows:-
Monday to Friday (inclusive) 7am to 5.30pm
High noise generating activities, including rock breaking and saw cutting be restricted between 8am to 5.00pm with a respite period between 12.00 noon to 1.30pm Monday to Friday
Saturday 8am to 12 noon
with NO high noise generating activities, including excavation, haulage truck movement, rock picking, sawing, jack hammering or pile driving to be undertaken. Failure to fully comply will result in the issue of a breach of consent P.I.N.
A Notice/Sign showing permitted working hours and types of work permitted during those hours, including the applicant’s phone number, project manager or site foreman, shall be displayed at the front of the site. The principal certifier must ensure building work, demolition or vegetation removal is not carried out on Sundays and public holidays, except where there is an emergency.
Unless otherwise approved within a construction site management plan, construction vehicles, machinery, goods, or materials must not be delivered to the site outside the approved hours of site works.
Note: Any variation to the hours of work requires Council’s approval.
Reason: To protect the amenity of the surrounding area.
31. E.2 - Compliance with the Building Code of Australia Building work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 69 of the EP&A 2021.
32. E.4 - Implementation of the site management plans While vegetation removal, demolition and/or building work is being carried out, the applicant must ensure the measures required by the approved construction site management plan and the erosion and sediment control plan are implemented at all times.
The applicant must ensure a copy of these approved plans is kept on site at all times and made available to Council officers upon request.
Reason: To ensure the required site management measures are implemented during construction.
33. E.5 - Implementation of BASIX commitments While building work is being carried out, the applicant must undertake the development strictly in accordance with the commitments listed in the BASIX certificate submitted under this application.
Reason: To ensure BASIX commitments are fulfilled in accordance with the BASIX certificate (prescribed condition under section 75 of the EP&A Regulation 2021.
34. E.6 - Surveys by a registered surveyor While building work is being carried out, a registered surveyor is to measure and mark the positions of the following and provide them to the principal certifier — a) All footings/ foundations b) At other stages of construction – any marks that are required by the principal certifier.
Reason: To ensure buildings are sited and positioned in the approved location
35. E.7 - Construction noise While building work is being carried out where no noise and vibration management plan is approved under this consent, the applicant is to ensure that any noise caused by demolition, vegetation removal or works does not exceed an LAeq (15 min) of 5dB(A) above background noise, when measured at any lot boundary of the property where these works are being carried out.
Reason: To protect the amenity of the neighbourhood.
36. E.8 - Tree protection While site or building work is being carried out, the applicant must maintain all required tree protection measures in good condition in accordance with the construction site management plan required under this consent, the relevant requirements of AS 4970-2009 Protection Of Trees on Development Sites and any Arborist’s report approved under this consent. This includes maintaining adequate soil grades and ensuring all machinery, builder’s refuse, spoil and materials remain outside tree protection zones.
Reason: To protect trees during construction.
37. E.9 - Responsibility for changes to public infrastructure While building work is being carried out, the applicant must pay any costs incurred as a result of the approved removal, relocation or reconstruction of infrastructure (including ramps, footpaths, kerb and gutter, light poles, kerb inlet pits, service provider pits, street trees or any other infrastructure in the street footpath area).
Reason: To ensure the payment of approved changes to public infrastructure.
38. E.10 - Shoring and adequacy of adjoining property (if applicable) If the development involves any excavation that extends below the level of the base of the footings of a building, structure, or work on adjoining land (including any structure or work within a road or rail corridor), the person having the benefit of the development consent must, at the person’s own expense —
a) Protect and support the building, structure or work from possible damage from the excavation, and b) Where necessary, underpin the building, structure or work to prevent any such damage.
This condition does not apply if the person having the benefit of the development consent owns the adjoining land or the owner of the adjoining land has given consent in writing to that condition not applying.
Reason: Prescribed condition - EP&A Regulation clause 98E
39. E.12 - Cut and fill While building work is being carried out, the principal certifier must be satisfied all soil removed from or imported to the site is managed in accordance with the following requirements: a) All excavated material removed from the site must be classified in accordance with the EPA’s Waste Classification Guidelines before it is disposed of at an approved waste management facility and the classification and the volume of material removed must be reported to the principal certifier. b) All fill material imported to the site must be Virgin Excavated Natural as defined in Schedule 1 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 or a material identified as being subject to a resource recovery exemption by the NSW EPA.
Reason: To ensure soil removed from the site is appropriately disposed of and soil imported to the site is safe for future occupants.
40. E.15.B - Critical stage inspections Critical stage inspections are to be carried out in accordance with Section 6.5 of the EP&A Act 1979 and sections 61, 63 and 65 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Development Certification and Fire safety) Regulation 2021.
Where Lane Cove Council is appointed as the principal certifier, an inspection is to be booked for each of the following relevant stages during the construction process:
a) underpinning; b) retaining walls; c) footings; d) reinforced concrete work; e) structural work; f) upper level floor and roof framing; and
Reason: EP&A Act requirement.
41. E.18.B - No obstruction of public way The public way and Council verge must not be obstructed by any materials, vehicles, refuse, skips or the like, under any circumstances. Non-compliance with this requirement will result in the issue of a notice by Council to stop all work on site.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
42. E.19.B – Encroachments 1. No portion of the proposed structure shall encroach onto adjoining properties. 2. The proposed construction shall not encroach onto any existing Council drainage pipe or easement unless approved by Council. If a Council stormwater pipe is located at site during construction, Council is to be immediately notified. Where necessary the drainage line is to be reconstructed or relocated to be clear of the proposed building works. Developer must lodge Stormwater Inspection Application form to Council. All costs associated with the reconstruction or relocation of the drainage pipe are to be borne by the applicant. Applicant is not permitted to carry out any works on existing Council and private stormwater pipe lines without Council’s approval. 3. No encroachment is to occur into public open space.
Reason: To ensure works are contained wholly within the subject site
43. E.20.EH – Stockpiles Stockpiles of topsoil, sand, aggregate, spoil or other material capable of being moved by water to be stored clear of any drainage line, easement, natural watercourse, footpath, kerb or roadside.
Reason: To mitigate adverse environmental impacts on the surrounding area.
44. E.25 – Special Condition – Stockpiling of Materials No stockpiling of materials, building equipment or additional activities listed in section 4.2 of AS4970-2009 The Protection of trees on Development Sites is to occur within designated tree protection areas or on the Council Owned Nature Strip. All building materials must be stored within the subject site.
Reason: To mitigate damage to Council land.
45. E.26 – Special Condition – Installation of retaining walls within the TPZ of retained trees The installation retaining walls within the Tree Protection Zone of retained trees must be done so using an isolated pier and beam method or use existing footings under the supervision of the project arborist. No roots greater than 30mm diameter are to be severed to facilitate the installation of the piers. A 150mm buffer must be given to roots greater than 30mm diameter. Roots less than 30mm diameter that conflict with the location of piers must be documented by the Project arborist and pruned with a sharp implement
Exposed roots shall be protected in accordance with section 4.5.4 of AS4970-2009 The protection of trees on Development Sites
Reason: To mitigate damage to retained trees.
46. E.27 – Special Condition – Construction of side pathways and pavers The new steppers within the Structural Root Zone of tree #5 and #17 are to be installed entirely above grade. Permeable fill consisting of 20mm angular stone is to be required to level any undulating ground. A geotextile fabric should then be used to separate the fill from a sand bedding layer. Paving may then be placed on the layer of sand bedding. Level depths of subbase are to be determined by the landscape company. Installation of the side pathway within the TPZ of protected trees is to be overseen by the project arborist.
Reason: To minimise unnecessary excavation within the Structural Root Zone of retained trees.
47. E.28 – Demolition of existing building and hard surfaces The demolition of the northwestern side of the existing carport within the Protection Zone of trees 5, 18 and 19 must be undertaken under the supervision of the project arborist. Demolition of above ground structures may be undertaken via machinery, with existing retaining wall bordering tree 5,18 and 19 is to be retained. Demolition must be undertaken from within the footprint of the existing structures. No machinery within this area is to be used below existing grade.
Reason: To protect the root system of retained trees.
48. E.29 – Special Condition – Excavation for stormwater services Excavation required for the installation of stormwater services within the TPZ of all retained tree must be overseen by the project arborist. Excavation is to be undertaken using hand tools only. No roots greater than 30mm diameter are to be severed as part of works. A 150mm buffer must be given to roots greater than 30mm diameter at allow for future growth. Roots less than 30mm diameter that conflict with services may be pruned by the project arborist using a sharp handsaw and documented within the compliance certificate.
Reason: To protect retained trees during construction.
PART F - BEFORE THE ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
49. F.1 - Works-as-executed plans and any other documentary evidence Before the issue of the relevant occupation certificate, the applicant must submit, to the satisfaction of the principal certifier, works-as-executed plans, any compliance certificates and any other evidence confirming the following completed works: (a) All stormwater drainage systems and storage systems (b) The following matters that Council requires to be documented: · Compliance with Part O - Stormwater Management of Lane Cove DCP 2010. Where a variation is sought, written approval shall be obtained from Council’s Urban Services Division. · Compliance with the requirements for waste and recycling, and bulky waste storage room(s) set out in Part Q – Waste Management and Minimisation of Lane Cove DCP 2010. · Compliance with AS-3500. · Certification from a suitably qualified engineer that the approved stormwater pipe system and 12000 litre of rainwater tank system have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans. · Signed plans by a registered surveyor clearly showing the surveyor’s details and date of signature. · Evidence of removal of all redundant gutter and footpath crossings and reinstatement of all kerbs, gutter, turfing and footpaths, to the satisfaction of Council’s Urban Services Division. · Certification from suitable engineer that the swimming pool has been constructed satisfying relevant Australian standards. · Certification from suitable licenced contractor that the all works have been constructed satisfying relevant Australian standards. · Certification from qualified structural engineer that the proposed construction have been completed according to approved plan and structurally satisfied
The principal certifier must provide a copy of the plans to Council with the occupation certificate.
Reason: To confirm the location of works once constructed that will become Council assets.
50. F.2 - Completion of public utility services Before the issue of the relevant occupation certificate, the principal certifier must ensure any adjustment or augmentation of any public utility services required as a result of the development, is completed to the satisfaction of the relevant authority. All costs associated with the relocation or removal of services shall be borne by the applicant.
The certifier must request written confirmation from the relevant authority that the relevant services have been completed.
Reason: To ensure required changes to public utility services are completed, in accordance with the relevant agency requirements before occupation.
51. F.3 - Post-construction dilapidation report Before the issue of an occupation certificate, a suitably qualified engineer must prepare a post-construction dilapidation report, to the satisfaction of the principal certifier, detailing whether:
a) after comparing the pre-construction dilapidation report to the post- construction dilapidation report required under this condition, there has been any structural damage to any adjoining buildings; and b) where there has been structural damage to any adjoining buildings, that it is a result of the building work approved under this development consent.
Before the issue of an occupation certificate, the principal certifier is to provide a copy of the post-construction dilapidation report to Council (where Council is not the principal certifier) and to the relevant adjoining property owner(s).
Reason: To identify damage to adjoining properties resulting from building work on the development site.
52. F.4 - Preservation of survey marks Before the issue of an occupation certificate, a registered surveyor must submit documentation to the principal certifier which demonstrates that: a) no existing survey marks have been removed, damaged, destroyed, obliterated or defaced, or b) the applicant has re-established any survey mark(s) that were damaged, destroyed, obliterated or defaced in accordance with the Surveyor General’s Direction No. 11 – Preservation of Survey Infrastructure.
Reason: To protect the State’s survey infrastructure.
53. F.5 - Repair of infrastructure Before the issue of an occupation certificate, the applicant must ensure any public infrastructure damaged as a result of the carrying out of building works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concreting vehicles) is fully repaired to the written satisfaction of Council, and at no cost to Council.
Note: If the council is not satisfied, the whole or part of the security/bond submitted will be used to cover the rectification work.
Reason: To ensure any damage to public infrastructure is rectified.
54. F.6 - Removal of waste upon completion Before the issue of an occupation certificate, the principal certifier must ensure all refuse, spoil and material unsuitable for use on the site is removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with the waste management plan. Written evidence of the removal must be supplied to the satisfaction of the principal certifier.
Before the issue of a partial occupation certificate, the applicant must ensure the temporary storage of any waste is carried out in accordance with the approved waste management plan to the principal certifier’s satisfaction.
Reason: To ensure waste material is appropriately disposed of or satisfactorily stored.
55. F.13.EH - Outdoor lighting Outdoor lighting shall comply with Australian Standard AS 4282-1997 – Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting. Where sites adjoin bushland, all outside lighting must be appropriately baffled to minimise light pollution into the bushland area. Native plantings may be used to absorb lighting.
Reason: To protect the amenity of nearby residential properties
56. F.19 – Special Condition – Replacement planting Trees that are removed must be replaced on a 1:1 ratio to comply with provisions outlined within Part J Landscaping of the Lane Cove Council Development Control plan 2010 unless otherwise stated within this consent. The Trees shall be replaced with endemic tree species at 75 litre pot size, selected from Councils DCP Part J – Landscape, Appendix 1 unless stated otherwise within this consent.
The following additional trees are to be planted on top of what is proposed under the approved landscape plan. These include:
· 3 x Tristaniopsis laurina “Luscious” (Water Gums) to be planted on the Council Nature strip in front of the property at regular intervals. These trees are to be planted from a minimum 100L pot size. - · 3 x Angophora costata (Sydney Red Gum) to be planted in the grassed area below the proposed pool and retaining walls adjoining 24 Woodford Street. These trees are to be planted from a minimum container size of 400L, with a minimum spacing of 5m from each other. - - Trees must be installed and signed off by the project arborist Prior to the issue of an Occupation Certificate.
Reason: To ensure replacement planting.
57. F.20EH – Special Condition – Landscape practical completion report A landscape practical completion report must be prepared by the consultant landscape architect and submitted to Council or the accredited certifier within 7 working days of the date of practical completion of all landscape works. This report must certify that all landscape works have been completed in accordance with the landscape working drawing. A copy of the report must be submitted to Council PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF THE OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE.
Reason: To ensure the completion of all landscape works.
58. F.21EH – Special Condition – Evidence of Maintenance Prior to issue of the Certificate of Occupation, the applicant must submit evidence of an agreement for the maintenance of all site landscaping by a qualified horticulturist, landscape contractor or landscape architect, for a period of 12 months from the date of issue of the Certificate of Occupation.
Reason: To ensure the landscape works are maintained.
59. F.22EH – 12 Month Maintenance Agreement At the completion of the landscape maintenance period, the consultant landscape architect/ designer must submit a final report to Council or the accredited certifier, certifying that all plant material has been successfully established, that all of the outstanding maintenance works or defects have been rectified prior to preparation of the report and that a copy of the 12-month landscape maintenance strategy has been provided to the Owner/ Occupier. The report must include site images, showing the establishment of the replacement trees chosen by Council. A site inspection by the Council Arborist may be required to ensure acceptable tree establishment. A copy of the report must be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensure the ongoing health and vitality of the plants during the establishment period.
PART H - OCCUPATION AND ONGOING USE
60. H.1 - Release of securities / bonds When Council receives an occupation certificate from the principal certifier, the applicant may lodge an application to release the securities held in accordance with Condition (2). Council may use part, or all of the securities held to complete the works to its satisfaction if the works do not meet Council’s requirements.
Reason: To allow release of securities and authorise Council to use the security deposit to complete works to its satisfaction.
61. H.4 – Maintenance of wastewater and stormwater treatment device During occupation and ongoing use of the building, the applicant must ensure all wastewater and stormwater treatment devices (including drainage systems, dispersal trench, rainwater tank and swimming pool) are regularly maintained, to remain effective and in accordance with any positive covenant.
Reason: To satisfy Council’s engineering requirements. To protect sewerage and stormwater systems.
|
Mark Brisby
Executive Manager
Environmental Services Division
There are no supporting documents for this report.
Lane Cove Local Planning Panel Meeting 15 August 2023
88 Carlotta Street, Greenwich.
Subject: 88 Carlotta Street, Greenwich.
Record No: DA23/14-01 - 44327/23
Division: Environmental Services Division
Author(s): Andrew Bland
Property: |
88 Carlotta Street, Greenwich. |
DA No: |
DA14/2023 |
Date Lodged: |
20/02/2023 |
Cost of Work: |
$88,000.00 |
Owner: |
Ravi Singh |
Applicant: |
Ravi Singh |
Description of the proposal to appear on determination |
Alterations and addition to a dwelling house including a lift. |
Zone |
R2 Low Density Residential |
Is the proposal permissible within the zone |
Yes |
Is the property a heritage item |
No
|
Is the property within a conservation area |
No
|
Is the property adjacent to bushland |
No
|
BCA Classification |
Class 1a and 10b |
Stop the Clock used |
No |
Notification |
Notified in accordance with Council’s policy and 6 submissions were received. |
REASON FOR SENDING TO LANE COVE PLANNING PANEL
The development application has been reported to the Lane Cove Planning Panel for the following reason:
· Clause 4.6 Floor Space Ratio 28% breach
· Clause 4.6 Height of building 10.53% breach
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
· On 22 February 2023, Development Application 14/2023 was lodged for alterations and addition to a dwelling house including a lift.
· The development application was accompanied by a Clause 4.6 Written Request for the proposed 28% Floor Space Ratio (“FSR”) breach. This has been considered and not supported due to the reasons provided later in this report.
· On 23 February 2023, the development application was notified in accordance with Council’s policy and 6 submissions were received. The key concerns related to the proposed FSR breach and view loss impacts.
· The development application includes 2 variations to Council’s DCP 2009 which have been justified in this report.
· Council’s planner conducted 4 site inspections and has provided a view loss analysis for all of these properties. It was concluded that the proposed development would have minor to no impact on the significant views of the Lane Cove River and Cockatoo Island.
· On 24 July 2023, Council received a Clause 4.6 Written Request for the proposed 10.53% building height breach. This has been considered and supported due to the reasons provided in this report.
· The recommendation is comprised of two parts which includes part refusal for the first floor addition works which would breach the FSR, and, part approval for the remaining works subject to the recommended conditions.
SITE
Lot and DP |
1/-/DP322594 and D/-/DP76934 |
Area |
278sqm |
Site location |
The site is located on the high northeast side of Carlotta Street. Pedestrian access is provided via a passageway from Greenwich Road. Vehicular access and further pedestrian access is located off Carlotta Street. |
Existing improvements |
The existing improvements include a part 4 storey dwelling house with an integrated garage and a swimming pool which is currently under construction. |
Shape |
Irregular |
Adjoining properties |
Adjoining properties include 2, 3 and 4 storey dwelling houses and of note is the heritage item at 153 Greenwich Road located east of the subject site. |
Figure 1: Frontage view from Carlotta Street (Source: Architectural plans)
Figure 2: Subject site highlighted in orange. (Source: Nearmaps)
Figure 3: Subject site has the orange terracotta roof with solar panels. (Source: Nearmaps)
PREVIOUS APPROVALS/HISTORY
No previous DA history.
PROPOSAL
The development application seeks consent for the following:
· Addition of a lift that would service the garage level, ground level and level 1. The lift would not provide access to the lower ground floor and surpass this level. These works are subject to the Clause 4.6 written request for the height breach. · The enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony attached to Bedroom 1. These works are subject to the Clause 4.6 written request for the FSR breach. · Replacement of the southwest corner balustrades of the first floor balcony with full height glass walls (the balcony still open, in part, facing the street) · Relocation of the glass sliding door on first floor balcony.
|
PROPOSAL DATA/POLICY COMPLIANCE
Local Environmental Plan 2009
Zoning: R2 Low Density Site Area: 278m²
|
Proposed |
Control |
Complies |
Floor Space Ratio |
The enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony would result in an additional 5sqm of GFA.
Existing FSR: 201sqm or 0.72:1
Proposed FSR: 206sqm or 0.74:1
(28% breach)
|
0.6:1 |
No, see Clause 4.6 Variation section.
Referral to the Lane Cove Planning Panel is required as the proposed breach is over 10%. |
Height of Buildings |
The lift would be 10.5m from ground level.
(10.53% breach)
No changes to the maximum ridge height of the building.
|
9.5m |
No, see Clause 4.6 Variation section.
Referral to the Lane Cove Planning Panel is required as the proposed breach is over 10%. |
Comprehensive DCP
|
Proposed |
Control |
Complies |
Front setback (min) |
The lift would be located 6.9m from the front boundary.
This would be contained within the footprint of an existing balcony. |
Consistent with area or 7.5m |
No, see variation section. |
Side setback (min) |
The lift maintains the existing side setback to the east boundary.
The glass wall along the first floor balcony would maintain the existing setback for the floor.
The enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony would have a nil setback (constructed on the north west boundary). |
1200mm single storey 1500mm two storey |
Yes
Yes
No, see variations section below. |
Rear setback (min) |
The enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony would be setback 9m. |
<1000m²: 8m or 25% |
Yes |
Wall Height (max) (max parapet of 600mm) |
The enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony would be 6m high.
The lift maintains the existing wall height of 8.1m. This structure would be contained within the existing building envelope and the garage level. |
7.0m |
Yes
Yes
|
Maximum Ridge height |
No changes to the maximum ridge height as the lift would be contained within the existing building envelope and the garage level. |
9.5m |
Yes |
Subfloor height (max) |
No changes |
1.5m |
Yes |
Number of Storeys (max) |
No changes |
2 |
Yes |
Landscaped area (min) (Minimum width of 1m required to be included in area) |
No changes to the landscaped area. |
35% |
Yes |
Cut and Fill (max) |
Minor excavation required for the lift. |
1m |
Yes |
Solar Access |
The solar access provisions have been met due to the ‘north south’ orientation of the site and dwelling house. |
3 hrs to north-facing windows |
Yes |
Provide for view sharing |
There would be satisfactory impacts on views as discussed in the B.4 View Sharing section later in this report. |
|
Yes |
Heritage Conservation |
There would be no impacts on heritage as discussed in the heritage referral section later in this report. |
|
Yes |
Balcony depth (max) |
The first floor balcony maintains the existing depth. |
3m |
Yes |
Private open space
|
Minimums exceeded. |
24 m² (min) 4m minimum depth |
Yes |
Basix Certificate |
Provided – A478181 |
Required |
Yes |
Clause 4.6 Written Request – Clause 4.3 Height of Buildings
Clause 4.6 of LCLEP 2009 allows exceptions to development standards to provide flexibility and achieve better outcomes for and from development as a result of this flexibility. Consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless the consent authority has considered and agrees with the written request from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard. This written request must demonstrate compliance with the relevant provisions of Clause 4.6 of LCLEP 2009.
Written request provided by the applicant
The applicant provided a written request seeking a variation to the building height development standard. The proposed lift would start in the existing garage level and extend to the top level of the dwelling. The lift would be 10.5m from the finished floor level of the existing garage. This height exceedance is largely due to the existing dwelling being cut significantly below the prior natural ground level. The lift would be fully contained within the existing building envelope and does not exceed the existing maximum ridge height of the building.
Clause 4.6 – Exceptions to Development Standards
(1) The objectives of this clause are as follows:
-
(a) to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development standards to particular development,
-
(b) to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in particular circumstances.
-
(2) Development consent may, subject to this clause, be granted for development even though the development would contravene a development standard imposed by this or any other environmental planning instrument. However, this clause does not apply to a development standard that is expressly excluded from the operation of this clause.
-
(3) Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless the consent authority has considered a written request from the applicant that seeks to justify the contravention of the development standard by demonstrating:
(a) that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and
-
(b) that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard.
-
(4) Development consent must not be granted for development that contravenes a development standard unless:
-
- (a) the consent authority is satisfied that:
(i) the applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be demonstrated by subclause (3), and
(ii) the proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out, and
(b) the concurrence of the Planning Secretary has been obtained.
Clause 4.6 (3) (a) & (b) the applicant is required to demonstrate:
(a) that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and,
(b) that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard.
The applicant’s Clause 4.6 written request states that it is unreasonable and unnecessary to require strict compliance with the development standard in this instance, and, that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard for the following reasons (which have been summarised):
-
· The proposed breach is minor and would not exceed the existing building height which was a principle acknowledged in the Fastbucks v Byron Shire Council (1999) NSWCA 19 proceeding.
· The proposed lift would not result in any overshadowing of neighbours or public areas.
-
· The proposed lift would not result in significant visual impacts to surrounding residents.
-
· The proposal would be contained within the existing built form.
-
· The proposed development has been carefully located and designed to ensure there would be no adverse amenity impacts upon neighbours regarding visual and acoustic privacy.
Comment: The proposed lift would have negligible impacts on the amenity of neighbours and provides improved amenity to the existing dwelling house. This structure would not protrude the existing building envelope and would not exceed the existing building height. The principles of the Bettar V City of Sydney Council NSWLEC 1070 proceeding can be applied to illustrate that when measured from a perceived natural ground level the proposed structure would attain a height of approximately 8.1m. This would be well below the height development standard from the ground level prior to any improvements of the site. The excavation utilised to provide the garage level is the primary reason for the proposed height breach in this instance. It is therefore considered that there are sufficient planning grounds to justify contravening the building height development standard.
The Clause 4.6 written request does no satisfy Clause 4.6(3) (a) & (b) of Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009.
Clause 4.6 (4) (a)(i) & (ii) & (b) the consent authority must be satisfied that:
- (a) the consent authority is satisfied that:
(i) the applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be demonstrated by subclause (3), and
(ii) the proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out, and
(b) the concurrence of the Planning Secretary has been obtained.
Development consent cannot be granted to vary a development standard unless a consent authority is satisfied that the proposed development would be in the public interest. This requires the development to be consistent with the objectives of the particular development standard and the objectives of the relevant zone that the development would be located in. An assessment against the objectives of the building height development standard and the R2 Low Density Residential zone contained within LCLEP 2009 are provided as follows:
Height of Building Objectives
Clause 4.3 (1) provides the following objectives:-
(a) to ensure development allows for reasonable solar access to existing buildings and public areas;
Comment: The proposed development meets the solar access provisions. There would be no additional shadowing from the proposed lift due to its location within the exiting balcony and the orientation of the lot. Therefore, the proposed development meets this objective.
(b) to ensure that privacy and visual impacts of development on neighbouring properties, particularly where zones meet, are reasonable;
Comment: The proposed lift would reduce the site lines to and from the front facing balconies. The proposed height breach would not result in visual privacy impacts or obstruct any significant views as discussed in the B4 View Sharing section later in this report. Therefore, the proposed development therefore meets this objective.
(c) to seek alternative design solutions in order to maximise the potential sunlight for the public domain; and
Comment: The proposed lift would not overshadow the public domain due to the orientation of the lot. Therefore, the proposed development therefore meets this objective.
(d) to relate development to topography
Comment: The proposed development would not alter the topography of the site. Whilst significant excavation was used to accommodate the existing garage level, the proposed development utilises this area without any additional impacts. Therefore, the proposed development therefore meets this objective.
R2 Low Density Residential Zone Objectives
The R2 Low Density Residential Zone objectives are as follows:
· To provide for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.
Comment: The proposed development provides for a low-density residential dwelling being a 2 storey dwelling house. The proposal seeks to connect the garage level with some of the levels above to increase the accessibility of the dwelling house.
· To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.
Comment: N/A – the proposed development would not be contrary to this objective.
· To retain, and where appropriate improve, the existing residential amenity of a detached single family dwelling area.
Comment: The proposed development is within the local character of the area and therefore would retain the existing residential amenity of the area. Condition 6 has been recommended to ensure the acoustic amenity is protected.
· To encourage new dwelling houses or extensions of existing dwelling houses that are not highly visible when viewed from the Lane Cove River or Parramatta River.
Comment: The proposed development would not be highly visible or offensive when viewed form the Lane Cove River. The lift is well integrated into the design of the dwelling house.
· To ensure that landscaping is maintained and enhanced as a major element in the residential environment.
Comment: The proposed development would have no impacts on the existing landscaping on the site.
In accordance with the above, the development is consistent with the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009 objectives for the Height of Buildings development standard and the R2 Low Density Residential zone and is therefore considered to be in the public interest.
Concurrence of the Planning Secretary.
The Local Planning Panel can assume concurrence for exceptions to development standards where the variation to the development standard is greater than 10%. As the proposal is referred to the Local Planning Panel for determination; concurrence is taken to be assumed.
Conclusion Clause 4.6 Height of Budlings
The objectives of Clause 4.6 are to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development standards and to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in particular circumstances. The breach to the height development standard of LCLEP 2009 is considered well-justified in this instance. There are sufficient environmental planning grounds to support the lift and the objectives of the development standard have been met. Therefore, approval of the lift would not be contrary to the public interest. The development satisfies the objectives and criteria outlined in Clause 4.6 and as such, the building height breach and written request is supported.
Clause 4.6 Written Request – Clause 4.4 Floor Space Ratio
Written request provided by the applicant
The applicant has provided a written request seeking a variation to the FSR development standard. The enclosure of the rear balcony attached to bedroom 1 would result in a further exceedance of existing FSR being 0.72:1. This can be seen in figure 4 below. The FSR would be 0.74:1 or 206sqm where the development standard prescribes a maximum of FSR of 0.6:1 or 167sqm. This would result in an exceedance of 28%
Figure 4: Blue area depicting the addition GFA on the first floor. (Source: Architectural plans)
Clause 4.6 (3) (a) & (b) the applicant is required to demonstrate:
(a) that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstances of the case, and,
(b) that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard.
The applicant’s Clause 4.6 written request states that it is unreasonable or unnecessary to require strict compliance with the development standard in this instance, and, that there are sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard for the following reasons (which have been summarised):
· The proposed addition would not be introducing significant bulk to the site.
· The conversion of the rear balcony into a storeroom (as identified on the plans) would be situated at the rear of the dwelling.
· The setbacks remain similar to that of the existing dwelling and that of the neighbouring dwellings.
· The proposed addition would be contained within the existing built form.
· The proposed addition remains consistent with the desired character of the locality.
· The proposed addition has been located and designed to ensure no adverse amenity impacts upon adjoining properties in respect to visual and acoustic privacy, overshadowing and view loss.
· The conversion of a rear balcony into a storage space would have a neutral to positive relationship with existing surrounding development.
Comment: The proposed enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony to habitable space is considered to be unjustified and unnecessary. The existing dwelling house already generously exceeds the allowable FSR by 24% which has been incorrectly calculated in the Clause 4.6 Written Request. There are insufficient planning grounds to justify contravening the development standard a further 4%.
The Clause 4.6 written request does no satisfy Clause 4.6(3) (a) & (b) of Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009.
Clause 4.6 (4) (a)(i) & (ii) & (b) the consent authority must be satisfied that:
(a) the consent authority is satisfied that:
(iii) the applicant’s written request has adequately addressed the matters required to be demonstrated by subclause (3), and
(iv) the proposed development will be in the public interest because it is consistent with the objectives of the particular standard and the objectives for development within the zone in which the development is proposed to be carried out, and
(b) the concurrence of the Planning Secretary has been obtained.
Development consent cannot be granted to vary a development standard unless a consent authority is satisfied that the proposed development would be in the public interest. This requires the development to be consistent with the objectives of the particular development standard and the objectives of the relevant zone that the development would be located in. An assessment against the objectives of the FSR and the R2 Low Density Residential zone contained within LCLEP 2009 are provided as follows:
Floor Space Ratio Objectives
Clause 4.4 (1) provides the following objectives:-
(d) to ensure that the bulk and scale of development is compatible with the character of the locality.
Comment: The proposed enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony is unnecessary and therefore would result in unsubstantiated additional bulk and scale. This would not be compatible with the character of the locality and would result in an undesirable precedent.
R2 Low Density Residential Zone Objectives
The R2 Low Density Residential Zone objectives are as follows:
· To provide for the housing needs of the community within a low density residential environment.
Comment: The proposed development would remain as a dwelling house in a low density residential environment. However, the enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony is excessive and beyond a reasonable FSR prescribed for this site as identified in the LCLEP 2009.
· To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.
Comment: Not applicable for this development application.
· To retain, and where appropriate improve, the existing residential amenity of a detached single family dwelling area.
Comment: The proposed development would improve the amenity of the subject dwelling house, however the additional bulk is not required and exacerbates the already oversized development.
· To encourage new dwelling houses or extensions of existing dwelling houses that are not highly visible when viewed from the Lane Cove River or Parramatta River.
Comment: The part of the development relating to this Clause 4.6 Written Request would not be visible from the Lane Cove River as it is located at the rear of the property.
· To ensure that landscaping is maintained and enhanced as a major element in the residential environment.
Comment: The proposed development would have no impacts on the existing landscaping on the site.
Comment: The proposed development is inconsistent with several of the objectives as identified above. The Clause 4.6 written request does not satisfy Clause 4.6 (4) (a)(i) & (ii) & (b) of Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009.
Clause 4.6 FSR Conclusion
The objectives of Clause 4.6 are to provide an appropriate degree of flexibility in applying certain development standards and to achieve better outcomes for and from development by allowing flexibility in particular circumstances. The breach of the FSR development standard would be unreasonable given the insufficient environmental planning grounds and inconsistency with the objectives of the zone and development standard. Approval of the FSR breach would be contrary to the public interest and would result in an undesirable precedence. Therefore, the proposed development fails to satisfy the objectives and criteria outlined in Clause 4.6 and as such, the FSR breach and written request is not supported.
REFERRALS
Development Engineer
No objections subject to recommended draft conditions.
Heritage Referral Officer
No objections subject to recommended draft conditions. The following comments were provided:
“Heritage Items
88 Carlotta Street is not a listed heritage item, but is located adjacent to 153 Greenwich Road, a house at the rear of the subject site. Features in Greenwich Road including rock outcrops and kerbs are also listed items.
Impact of the proposed extension
The proposed development will have minimal impact on the adjacent heritage items. The work is essentially internal, except for the top of the lift shaft and enclosure of the balcony, both of which are located on the opposite side of the building to Greenwich Road.
Recommendations
The proposed alterations will have minimal impact on any heritage items in the vicinity, therefore I have no objection to the proposed work.”
B.4 View Sharing
The sharing of all views is part of the character of the Lane Cove area and should be maintained where possible subject to how the view is obtained and whether the maintenance of such a view creates an unreasonable impost on adjoining landowners. Views gained across other privately-owned land are not “as of right”, as some may depend on the property that is overviewed maintaining a lower scale that is achievable under the LCLEP 2009.
The Tenacity principle is a 4-step test implemented by the Land and Environment Court for the purposes of view loss assessment. The objectives of the B.4 View sharing section of the Lane Cove Council DCP 2010 outline the key components of this 4-step view sharing principle.
The four steps of the Tenacity principle area as follows:
· Step 1. Assessing the types views to be affected. Water views are valued more highly than land views. Iconic views are valued more highly than views without icons. Whole views are valued more highly than partial views.
· Step 2. Assessing what part of the property the views are obtained. Side views are harder to protect than rear or front views and seated views are harder to protect than standing views and living rooms and kitchens are more valuable than bedrooms.
· Step 3. Assessing the extent of the impact. This should be done for the whole of the property, not just the view that is affected.
· Step 4. Assessing the reasonableness of the proposal. A proposal which is fully compliant is more reasonable than one which doesn’t comply, and, proposals which have been skilfully designed are considered more reasonable.
Figure 5: Aerial photo identifying the neighbouring properties. (Source: Nearmaps)
The following table provide a summarised view loss analysis against the tenacity principle.
View analysis |
|
Property location |
View Analysis |
145 Greenwich Road, Greenwich. Figure 6: View obtained from the first floor balcony and living areas, overlooking the rear of the subject site and the external balcony which is proposed to be enclosed. (Source: Council Planner)
|
No impacts – There would be no impacts on the water views of the Lane Cove River or the views of Cockatoo Island. See figure 6.
|
147 Greenwich Road, Greenwich. Figure 7: View obtained from the first floor kitchen area and balcony which overlooks the northeast corner of the subject dwelling house. (Source: Council planner)
|
Satisfactory – There would be negligible impacts on the water views of the Lane Cove River. The subject view is obtained from the kitchen and over multiple side boundaries. The lift would obstruct a negligible portion of the view which is obtained through the balustrade and support beams of the first floor balcony of the subject site. See figure 7. |
151 Greenwich Road, Greenwich. Figure 8: View obtained from the first floor living area and balcony which overlooks the front yard and front facing balcony of the subject site. (Source: Council planner)
Figure 9: View obtained from the ground floor balcony. (Source: Council planner)
|
Satisfactory – There would be minor impacts on the water views of the Lane Cove River. The subject view is obtained from the first floor balcony and living area, over multiple side boundaries and lots. The lift would be located in a small portion of the view corridor, partially obstructed by existing foliage, which is obtained through the side of the first floor balcony of the subject site. This can be seen in figure 8.
Figure 9 below shows the view to Lane Cove River and Cockatoo Island from the ground floor balcony which would have no impacts. |
153 Greenwich Road, Greenwich.
(Image of view below) Figure 10: View obtained from the ground floor balcony. (Source: Council planner)
|
No impacts – There would be no impacts on the water views of the Lane Cove River. The lift would be located behind the large bush in the rear yard. See figure 10.
Unobstructed water views are obtained in a 90 degree direction form the stood position referenced in figure 10. This is the same unobstructed view obtained in figure 9 from the adjoining property. |
Other Planning Instruments
SEPP (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 – Chapter 4 Remediation of Land
The subject site and adjoining sites are zoned for residential purposes. Given the types of uses permissible within the residential zones, it is unlikely that the site would be contaminated.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
The Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 indicates that the standards for demolition and removal of materials should meet with AS 2601-2001 and therefore any consent will require the application of a relevant condition seeking compliance with the Standard.
Variations to Council’s Codes/PolicIes (seCTIONS 4.15(1)(a), (1)(b), and (1)(c))
The preceding policy assessment table identifies those controls that the proposal does not comply with. The front setback and side setback departures are discussed below.
Figure 8: Front setback measurement: (Source: Architectural Plans with measurements from planner)
Proposed |
Control |
Comment |
Council support |
6.9m - front setback for the lift. |
7.5m front setback. |
Clause 1.3.1 a) of Part C1 of the Lane Cove Development Control Plan 2010 states the following:
a) Where there is no predominant setback within the street, the setback should be a minimum of 7.5m.
The proposed setback of the lift can be seen in figure 8 above.
A variation in reasonable in this instance for the following reasons:
- The lift would be fully contained within the envelope of the existing front facing balconies, - The lift would be setback 6.9m from the front boundary and due to the shape of the site this would be an improvement on the 4.7m front wall setback on the other side of the balcony, - There would be no changes to the existing vegetation and landscaping on the site, - There would be negligible amenity impacts on neighbouring properties in regards to visual and acoustic privacy, and, - There would be satisfactory to no impacts on views as discussed in the B.4 View Sharing above.
|
Yes |
The enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony would have a nil setback from the north west boundary. |
1500mm side setback. |
The proposed enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony is not supported. |
Structure not supported |
RESPONSE TO NOTIFICATION (Section 4.15(1)(d))
Concern |
Comment |
Impacts on views – concerns that there would be a detrimental impact on significant views as a result of the lift and the rear extension.
|
The impact on views has been assessed against the tenacity principle in the B.4 View Sharing section of this report.
It is concluded them there would be satisfactory to no impacts. |
FSR breach – concerns with the additional FSR and the enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony.
|
The proposed FSR breach and associated works are not supported by Council. Refer to the Clause 4.6 Written Request section of this report for further detail. |
Impacts on privacy and amenity – concerns that the proposed structures would have impacts on visual and acoustic privacy.
|
The part enclosure of the balcony would reduce any acoustic impacts from the existing balcony.
Acoustic impacts have been mitigated through the recommended Condition 6. This condition ensures that the noise generated by the lift is reasonable so that acoustic amenity is maintained. This is to be certified by a qualified acoustic expert.
The balcony is attached to a bedroom which is a low use room and it is unlikely the balcony would be used for entertainment purposes.
There would be a reduction in sightlines to and from the balcony due to the lift.
Therefore, there would be a net benefit impact on visual and acoustic impacts from the balcony.
|
Impacts of the lift – Concerns that the lift would have unreasonable impacts regarding noise, ventilation, overshadowing and would be inconsistent with the street. |
Lifts are a permissible structure and the proposed lift has been well integrated into the design of the dwelling house.
There would be negligible impacts, if any, on ventilation and overshadowing.
Acoustic amenity has been addressed as explained above.
|
CONCLUSION
Part 1 Recommended Refusal
The recommendation of this report is comprised of two parts. Part 1 addresses the enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony and accompanying Clause 4.6 Written Request for FSR breach. These works and the written request have not been supported for the reasons provided earlier in this report. It is recommended that the architectural plans are to be amended as prescribed in Condition 2 to ensure consistency with Part 2 of recommendation.
Part 2 Recommended Approval
Part 2 addresses the remaining components of the development application including the lift and front balcony treatment works. The relevant Clause 4.6 Written Request for building height has been supported for the reasons provided earlier in this report.
The matters in relation to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 have been satisfied.
The remaining part of the application generally meets with the Part C Residential Development Objectives in the Lane Cove Development Control Plan.
On balance the remaining part of proposed development would be reasonable and therefore is reported to the Lane Cove Planning Panel approval subject to the conditions recommended under Part 2.
Part 1 Refusal – Enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony
The applicant has made a written request pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009 for the proposed FSR breach. The relevant matters have not been satisfied and there would be insufficient planning grounds to support the proposed breach. Enclosing the rear level 1 balcony would be inconsistent with the objectives of the development standard and of the zone in which the development is to be carried out. This portion of the proposed development would be contrary to the public interest.
For these reasons this part of the development application has been recommended for refusal. The architectural plans are to be amended as prescribed in Condition 2 to ensure consistency with Part 2 of recommendation.
Part 2 Approval - Lift and front balcony treatment works
Regarding the remaining parts of the development application including the lift and front balcony treatment works.
The applicant has made a written request pursuant to Clause 4.6 of the Lane Cove Local Environmental Plan 2009 for the proposed breach of the building height development standard. Council is satisfied that the Clause 4.6 requirements have been met and that there are sufficient planning grounds to support the variation. The proposed development would be in the public interest because the exceedance is consistent with the objectives of the development standard and of the zone in which the development is to be carried out. Therefore, it is recommended that the Clause 4.6 written request for the building height development standard be supported.
That pursuant to Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 the Lane Cove Local Planning Panel, at its meeting of 15 August 2023, exercising the functions of Council as the consent authority, approve Development Application DA14/2023 for alterations and addition to a dwelling house including a lift, at 88 Carlotta Street, Greenwich subject to the following conditions.
PART A – GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. A.1 - Approved plans Development must be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans (stamped by Council), except where the conditions of this consent expressly require otherwise.
In the event of any inconsistency between the approved plans and a condition of this consent, the condition prevails.
Reason: To ensure all parties are aware of the approved plans and supporting documentation that applies to the development.
2. A.2 - Design amendment – Enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony NOT SUPPORTED The proposed enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony, located of bedroom 1, is NOT SUPPORTED. Before the issue of a construction certificate, the certifier must ensure the approved construction certificate plans (and specifications) detail the following required amendments to the approved plans and supporting documentation stamped by Council:
- Removal of all associated works with the enclosure of the rear level 1 balcony which is located of bedroom 1.
Reason: To require minor amendments to the approved plans and supporting documentation following assessment of the development.
3. A.3 - Payment of security deposits Before the commencement of any works on the site, or the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant must make the following payment to Council and provide written evidence of these payments to the Certifier:
The payments will be used for the cost of: · making good any damage caused to any council property (including street trees) as a consequence of carrying out the works to which the consent relates, and, · completing any public work such as roadwork, kerbing and guttering, footway construction, stormwater drainage and environmental controls, required in connection with this consent.
Reason: To ensure any damage to public infrastructure is rectified and public works can be completed.
4. A.9.T - Works on Council land A separate application shall be made to Council’s Urban Services Division for any associated works on Council property. Written approval is to be obtained prior to the start of any works on Council property.
Reason: To manage impacts to Council’s assets.
5. A.12 – Construction Certificate The submission of a Construction Certificate and its issue by Council or Principal Certifier PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK commencing.
Reason: To ensures the detailed construction plans and specifications comply with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia (BCA) and any relevant Australian Standard.
6. A.13 - Acoustic certification of the lift A verification certificate from an acoustic consultant is to be prepared. This must confirm that the noise generated by the lift & lift motor (when measured at the site boundaries) does not exceed 5dB(A) above background noise. This verification certificate is to be submitted to Council.
Reason: To ensures that the noise generated by the lift is reasonable so that acoustic amenity is maintained.
PART B – PRIOR TO DEMOLITION WORKS
7. B.3.EH - Compliance with demolition standard Demolition of buildings and structures must comply with Australian Standard AS 2601—2001: The Demolition of Structures.
Reason: Prescribed condition under the EP&A Regulation 2021.
PART C - BEFORE THE ISSUE OF A CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATE
8. C.1 - Construction site management plan Prior to any demolition works and before the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant must ensure a construction site management plan is provided to and approved by the principal certifier. The plan must include the following matters: · location and materials for protective fencing and hoardings to the perimeter on the site. · provisions for public safety · pedestrian access, including disabled and pram access, is to be maintained throughout the course of the construction as per AS-1742.3, ’Part 3 - Traffic control devices for works on roads’ · pedestrian and vehicular site access points and construction activity zones · location of site storage areas and sheds · equipment used to carry out all works · a garbage container with a tight-fitting lid The applicant must ensure a copy of the approved construction site management plan is kept on-site at all times during construction.
Council Approvals 1. Where hoarding is required to be provided along the street frontage, a Hoarding Application is to be submitted to Council for approval. 2. Any construction plant on the public road reservation requires an approved “Application for standing plant permit”.
Reason: To require details of measures that will protect the public, and the surrounding environment, during site works and construction.
9. C.2 - Erosion and sediment control plan Prior to any demolition works or clearing of any vegetation and before the issue of a construction certificate, the applicant is to ensure that an erosion and sediment control plan is prepared in accordance with the following documents before it is provided to and approved by the principal certifier:
· Council’s development control plan, · the guidelines set out in the NSW Department of Housing manual ‘Managing Urban Stormwater: Soils and Construction Certificate’ (the Blue Book), and · the ‘Do it Right On-Site, Soil and Water Management for the Construction Industry' (Southern Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils and the Natural Heritage Trust).
The applicant must ensure the erosion and sediment control plan is kept on- site at all times during site works and construction.
Reason: To ensure no substance other than rainwater enters the stormwater system and waterways
10. C.24.E - Structural engineer’s details The Construction Certificate plans and specifications must include detailed professional structural engineering plans and/or specifications for the following: · underpinning; · footings; · structural work; · the lift structure.
Reason: To ensure structural adequacy.
PART D - BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF BUILDING WORK
11. D.1 - Erosion and sediment controls in place Before the commencement of any site or building work, the principal certifier must be satisfied the erosion and sediment controls in the erosion and sediment control plan, (as approved by the principal certifier) are in place until the site is rectified (at least 70% ground cover is achieved over any bare ground on site).
Reason: To ensure runoff and site debris do not impact local stormwater systems and waterways.
12. D.3 - Signs on site A sign must be erected in a prominent position on any site on which building work or demolition work is being carried out: a) showing the name, address and telephone number of the principal certifier for the work; and b) showing the name of the principal contractor (if any) for any building work and a telephone number on which that person may be contacted outside working hours; and c) stating that unauthorised entry to the work site is prohibited. Any such sign is to be maintained while any demolition or building work is being carried out but must be removed when these works have been completed.
Note: This does not apply in relation to building work, or demolition work, that is carried out inside an existing building that does not affect the external walls of the building.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 70 of the EP&A Regulation 2021.
13. D.4 - Compliance with the Home Building Act In the case of residential building work for which the Home Building Act 1989 requires there to be a contract of insurance in force in accordance with Part 6 of that Act, that such a contract of insurance is in force before any building work authorised to be carried out by the consent commences.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 69 of the EP&A Regulation 2021.
14. D.5 - Home Building Act requirements Residential building work within the meaning of the Home Building Act 1989 must not be carried out unless the principal certifier for the development to which the work relates (not being Council) has given Council written notice of the following information — a) In the case of work for which a principal contractor is required to be appointed - i) the name and licence number of the principal contractor, and ii) the name of the insurer by which the work is insured under Part 6 of that Act, b) In the case of work to be done by an owner-builder— i) the name of the owner-builder, and c) if the owner-builder is required to hold an owner-builder permit under that Act, the number of the owner-builder permit. If arrangements for doing the residential building work are changed while the work is in progress so that the information notified becomes out of date, further work must not be carried out unless the principal certifier for the development to which the work relates (not being the Council) has given Council written notice of the updated information.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 71 EP&A Regulation 2021.
PART E - WHILE BUILDING WORK IS BEING CARRIED OUT
15. E.1 - Hours of work The principal certifier must ensure that building work, demolition or vegetation removal is only carried out between: Monday to Friday (inclusive) 7.00am to 5.30pm Saturday 7.00am to 4.00pm
With NO high noise generating activities, to be undertaken after 12 Noon on Saturday.
A Notice/Sign showing permitted working hours and types of work permitted during those hours, including the applicant’s phone number, project manager or site foreman, shall be displayed at the front of the site.
The principal certifier must ensure building work, demolition or vegetation removal is not carried out on Sundays and public holidays, except where there is an emergency.
Reason: To protect the amenity of the surrounding area.
16. E.2 - Compliance with the Building Code of Australia Building work must be carried out in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code of Australia.
Reason: Prescribed condition under section 69 of the EP&A 2021.
17. E.4 - Implementation of the site management plans While vegetation removal, demolition and/or building work is being carried out, the applicant must ensure the measures required by the approved construction site management plan and the erosion and sediment control plan are implemented at all times.
The applicant must ensure a copy of these approved plans is kept on site at all times and made available to Council officers upon request.
Reason: To ensure the required site management measures are implemented during construction.
18. E.5 - Implementation of BASIX commitments While building work is being carried out, the applicant must undertake the development strictly in accordance with the commitments listed in the BASIX certificate submitted under this application.
Reason: To ensure BASIX commitments are fulfilled in accordance with the BASIX certificate (prescribed condition under section 75 of the EP&A Regulation 2021.
19. E.6 - Surveys by a registered surveyor While building work is being carried out, a registered surveyor is to measure and mark the positions of the following and provide them to the principal certifier — a) All footings/ foundations b) At other stages of construction – any marks that are required by the principal certifier.
Reason: To ensure buildings are sited and positioned in the approved location
20. E.7 - Construction noise While building work is being carried out where no noise and vibration management plan is approved under this consent, the applicant is to ensure that any noise caused by demolition, vegetation removal or works does not exceed an LAeq (15 min) of 5dB(A) above background noise, when measured at any lot boundary of the property where these works are being carried out.
Reason: To protect the amenity of the neighbourhood.
21. E.9 - Responsibility for changes to public infrastructure While building work is being carried out, the applicant must pay any costs incurred as a result of the approved removal, relocation or reconstruction of infrastructure (including ramps, footpaths, kerb and gutter, light poles, kerb inlet pits, service provider pits, street trees or any other infrastructure in the street footpath area).
Reason: To ensure the payment of approved changes to public infrastructure.
22. E.15.B - Critical stage inspections Critical stage inspections are to be carried out in accordance with Section 6.5 of the EP&A Act 1979 and sections 61, 63 and 65 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Development Certification and Fire safety) Regulation 2021.
Where Lane Cove Council is appointed as the principal certifier, an inspection is to be booked for each of the following relevant stages during the construction process:
a) underpinning; b) footings; c) structural work; d) the lift structure.
Reason: EP&A Act requirement.
23. E.18.B - No obstruction of public way The public way and Council verge must not be obstructed by any materials, vehicles, refuse, skips or the like, under any circumstances. Non-compliance with this requirement will result in the issue of a notice by Council to stop all work on site.
Reason: To ensure public safety.
24. E.19.B – Encroachments 1. No portion of the proposed structure shall encroach onto adjoining properties. 2. The proposed construction shall not encroach onto any existing Council drainage pipe or easement unless approved by Council. If a Council stormwater pipe is located at site during construction, Council is to be immediately notified. Where necessary the drainage line is to be reconstructed or relocated to be clear of the proposed building works. Developer must lodge Stormwater Inspection Application form to Council. All costs associated with the reconstruction or relocation of the drainage pipe are to be borne by the applicant. Applicant is not permitted to carry out any works on existing Council and private stormwater pipe lines without Council’s approval.
Reason: To ensure works are contained wholly within the subject site
25. E.20.EH – Stockpiles Stockpiles of topsoil, sand, aggregate, spoil or other material capable of being moved by water to be stored clear of any drainage line, easement, natural watercourse, footpath, kerb or roadside.
Reason: To mitigate adverse environmental impacts on the surrounding area.
PART F - BEFORE THE ISSUE OF AN OCCUPATION CERTIFICATE
26. F.1 - Works-as-executed plans and any other documentary evidence Before the issue of the relevant occupation certificate, the applicant must submit, to the satisfaction of the principal certifier, works-as-executed plans, any compliance certificates and any other evidence confirming the following completed works: (a) All stormwater drainage systems and storage systems (b) The following matters that Council requires to be documented:
· Compliance with Part O - Stormwater Management of Lane Cove DCP 2010. Where a variation is sought, written approval shall be obtained from Council’s Urban Services Division. · Compliance with AS-3500. · The stormwater from new roof/impervious area is to be connected to existing drainage system. A hydraulic engineer’s certificate is required to show that the existing drainage system is in good working order and satisfies the requirements of Part O - Stormwater Management of Lane Cove DCP 2010 · Certification from suitable licenced contractor that the all works have been constructed in accordance with the relevant Australian standards.
The principal certifier must provide a copy of the plans to Council with the occupation certificate.
Reason: To confirm the location of works once constructed that will become Council assets.
27. F.2 - Completion of public utility services Before the issue of the relevant occupation certificate, the principal certifier must ensure any adjustment or augmentation of any public utility services including gas, water, sewer, electricity, street lighting and telecommunications, required as a result of the development, is completed to the satisfaction of the relevant authority.
Before the issue of the occupation certificate, the principal certifier must request written confirmation from the relevant authority that the relevant services have been completed.
Reason: To ensure required changes to public utility services are completed, in accordance with the relevant agency requirements before occupation.
28. F.4 - Preservation of survey marks Before the issue of an occupation certificate, a registered surveyor must submit documentation to the principal certifier which demonstrates that: a) no existing survey mark(s) have been removed, damaged, destroyed, obliterated or defaced, or b) the applicant has re-established any survey mark(s) that were damaged, destroyed, obliterated or defaced in accordance with the Surveyor General’s Direction No. 11 – Preservation of Survey Infrastructure.
Reason: To protect the State’s survey infrastructure.
29. F.5 - Repair of infrastructure Before the issue of an occupation certificate, the applicant must ensure any public infrastructure damaged as a result of the carrying out of building works (including damage caused by, but not limited to, delivery vehicles, waste collection, contractors, sub-contractors, concreting vehicles) is fully repaired to the written satisfaction of Council, and at no cost to Council.
Note: If the council is not satisfied, the whole or part of the security/bond submitted will be used to cover the rectification work.
Reason: To ensure any damage to public infrastructure is rectified.
30. F.6 - Removal of waste upon completion Before the issue of an occupation certificate, the principal certifier must ensure all refuse, spoil and material unsuitable for use on the site is removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with the waste management plan. Written evidence of the removal must be supplied to the satisfaction of the principal certifier.
Before the issue of a partial occupation certificate, the applicant must ensure the temporary storage of any waste is carried out in accordance with the approved waste management plan to the principal certifier’s satisfaction.
Reason: To ensure waste material is appropriately disposed of or satisfactorily stored.
PART H - OCCUPATION AND ONGOING USE
31. H.1 - Release of securities / bonds When Council receives an occupation certificate from the principal certifier, the applicant may lodge an application to release the securities held in accordance with Condition 3. Council may use part, or all of the securities held to complete the works to its satisfaction if the works do not meet Council’s requirements.
Reason: To allow release of securities and authorise Council to use the security deposit to complete works to its satisfaction.
|